Auto boutiques-francophones Simple and secure cloud storage fallcleaning Cook Music Deals Store Fall Tools
Buy Used
CDN$ 16.87
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Crusades Paperback – Oct 1 1999

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Paperback, Oct 1 1999
CDN$ 48.90 CDN$ 16.43

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.

Product Details

Product Description

About the Author

David Nicolle PhD was born in 1944 and was educated at Highgate School. For eight years he worked in the BBC Arabic Service. In 1971 he went 'back to school', gaining an MA from the School of Oriental and African Studies and a PhD from Edinburgh University. For some years he taught art and architectural history at Yarmuk University, Jordan. David has written many Osprey titles, including Men-at-Arms 140 'Armies of the Ottoman Turks', Men-at-Arms 320 'Armies of the Caliphates 862-1098', and Campaign 43 'Fornovo 1495'.

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
First Sentence
the Jews. Such activity was condemned by the Church and was often an excuse for mere extortion. Read the first page
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 10 reviews
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Way too big of a task for a single Essential Histories volume. Feb. 21 2008
By Amazon Customer - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This is the first volume in the enormous Essential Histories series from Osprey Publishing. If you're considering reading these books, I wouldn't recommend starting with this one. If you do, please realize that this one isn't a very good representative of the series. Most of the volumes are excellent, with a good blend of detailed accounts of individual battles, interesting descriptions of historical figures, and informative information about the general setting and attitudes of the time. This volume utterly fails in all of those categories.

I'm not placing all of the blame on the author however. Osprey Publishing was simply a bit overzealous in thinking that it could cover a series of events that took place over hundreds of years in a single 96-page volume. Whereas the Civil War and Napoleonic Wars are covered in four volumes each, and World War II in six, the entire series of individual crusades is covered in a single volume. What you end up with is a very brief skimming of the overall picture and outcome of the Crusades. Hardly any time at all is spent on individual crusades, much less individual battles (which you get so much of in other Essential Histories).

Also, throughout this book the author downplays the importance of the Crusades to the people of the Mediterranean and Middle East. What he fails to adequately portray is the long-standing and powerful beliefs and feelings that these events have cast on history ever since.

The only really good part of this book is the multitude of excellent pictures, showing everything from architecture to weaponry of the time. Still, of the Essential Histories I've read, this was my least favorite and definitely the least informative. I recommend starting with others.
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful
The Cliff Notes of military history April 2 2006
By Hiram Grant - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The "Essential Histories" series from Osprey could easily be compared to the Cliff Notes series. They'll give you a nice introduction to a topic you are not familiar with, but no real depth. Most volumns are under 100 pages; therefore, don't expect many "man in the trenches" stories.

A nice introduction, but once again, a bit too much time period to make it one of the better books in this series. But for a 88 page book on the subject, it's well done.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Mediocre intro to the Crusades July 15 2009
By K. Murphy - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The text of this Osprey title merely rehashs topics that are addressed, in greater detail (and perhaps, greater accuracy) in thousands of other books. Richard Hook's color plates add a lively splash of color, and are accurate if selective in the events and warriors they portray. As others have stated - this is far to grand a topic for a book of 60 pages to attempt to discuss in any detail - this book is a mediocre introduction to the Crusades that is rescued by some exciting artwork.
Extremely biased and succint, the crusades need a new and extended approach in this series Sept. 17 2015
By Anibal Madeira - Published on
Format: Paperback
Firstly and as some other reviewer already mentioned, one single volume to summarize all the crusades is simply folly. Many other conflicts in this “Essential Histories” series had several volumes including Napoleonic wars, American Civil War or the World Wars. Clearly this subject should have been considered for multiple volumes.

Secondly, the author is a great scholar of Islamic warfare, and authored some incredible books that I count among my favorites. But when there is interaction between his favorite study subjects and the western "barbarians" there goes scholarly impartiality. And the main issue is that he then forgets or ignores basic info and the omissions are omnipresent. In a recent book by David Nicolle he even reports that Saint Ignatius of Loyola was a Portuguese Knight!

I was born during a fascist regime, and most history books published in those days (which I’ve read in my infancy) was filled with prejudice against the moors and Islam in general. They were clearly the “evil” foes and our heroes of the Reconquista were paragons of virtue. That way to show history to the public creates prejudice, a sense of us against them, a sense of superiority of our ethnic, cultural and religious thoughts, etc. And I truly thought that in the 21st century that way to write history was almost dead. But this book proves me wrong, although the target now are the westerners! The Islamic world being white washed of all wrongdoing and being the poor victims of senseless and unprovoked Frankish attack. This kind of victimization and partiality in the transmission of the facts leads to profound prejudice and hatred for the western world which can create fanaticism.

After reading this book you’ll “learn” that:

1 – The conflicts between Islam and Christian powers before the crusades were low scale;
2 – Before the crusades there was no excessive violence or atrocities between factions;
3 - Jihad was a response to the crusades (the author even translates it “counter-crusade”);
4 – Only after the crusades there were serious persecution of Christians in the Islamic world;
5 – After the initial Islamic expansion of the caliphs and the Umahyyad, there was no Islamic expansionism and outward attacks; the crusades reinitiated the Islamic expansionism;
6 – The main victim of the crusades was the Byzantine Empire;
7- Islam had the greatest scientific civilization and western Franks, although they weren’t as barbarous as the 10th century ones, were just slightly better;
8 – Most of the examples will show Franks in a bad light.

Now just some thoughts regarding the above mentioned issues:

1 – So, the complete destruction of Ani (the city of 1001 churches), the capital of Christian Armenia and one of the biggest cities of Asia Minor was low scale…and the conquest of half the Byzantine Empire…hummm
2 – The description of the immense slaughter at Ani in 1064 (35 years before the crusades) by the Arab historian Sibt ibn al-Jawzi will clear any thought that there were no Islamic atrocities before the crusades: “The army entered the city, massacred its inhabitants, pillaged and burned it, leaving it in ruins and taking prisoner all those who remained alive...The dead bodies were so many that they blocked the streets; one could not go anywhere without stepping over them. And the number of prisoners was not less than 50,000 souls. I was determined to enter city and see the destruction with my own eyes. I tried to find a street in which I would not have to walk over the corpses; but that was impossible. “
3 – Do I really need say anything regarding the third issue??? Really?
4 – Well, here David Nicolle is mostly right. Although there were special taxes for Christians and some limitations regarding visible crosses and bells, attacks on Christians were rare and usually from bandits and marauders;
5 – Wrong again; The Islamic Caliphates never ceased to invade or raid western lands when the opportunity arose, even after the initial Umahyyad caliphate expansion (ex.: The Aghlabid (loyal to the Abbasids) attacks on Rome in 846 and 849; Sicily on the ninth century was invaded and attacked several times). Obviously when they sensed that they had no chance they ceased that course of action (ex.: After twice failing the conquest of Constantinople In the 7th and 8th cent.);
6 – The fourth crusade was a disaster for the Byzantine Empire, and the rise to mercantile power of the Italian city states severely affected Byzantine commerce; but without the crusades the Eastern Roman Empire would have no buffer after the terrible loss of Anatolia (their prime recruiting grounds)…so the authors opinion is debatable;
7 – Mostly true. Islamic world was far more scientifically advanced, but the Franks weren’t properly ignorants. Western architecture in the 10th-11th century is clearly more impressive than Islamic, with incredible innovations both in civil, religious and military architecture. It required solid scientific knowledge to build a huge cathedral.
8 – In this book you’ll find excerpts of Muslim merchants and Frankish pirates; all referred Muslim victories are crushing victories, but Arsuf is just “little more than a failed ambush”; when quoting Baha’ al Din Ibn Shaddad where he states that Frankish armor was impervious to their arrows the author inserted brackets stating “at long range” when there is nothing of the sort in the source (Baha’ al Din Ibn Shaddad don’t mention that the shots were at long range); the main reason for the fall of the crusader states was the reorganization of the Mamluk Sultanate (it had nothing to do that by the end of the 13th century (and most of its history by the way) the crusader states had minimal resources in manpower and materiel (except when there was a crusade going on)), etc.

There are some very valid points in this book and occasional excellent strategic analyses, such as the evaluation of the impact of the crusades, the fact that it was a side show compared to the Mongol invasion, very good photographs of artifacts and sculptures, fine maps and city plants describing some main attacks and sieges, including: General map of the crusades; Jerusalem under crusader occupation 12th Cent; 12th Cent Damascus and the siege of the city by the second crusade in July AD 1148; The struggle for Egypt (1163 -1250); Krak des Chevaliers; The crusader states at their greatest extent c. AD 1144; Constantinople and the fourth crusade; The Mongol invasions of the Islamic world and Europe; Crusader Acre and the Mamluk siege of 1291; The Mamluk Sultanate c. AD 1295 and the end of the crusader states.

As an Essential History title, it fails. There are far better introductions to the crusades.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Crusades Sept. 1 2011
By Monsignor de Beaumanoir - Published on
Format: Paperback
Osprey Books are a must for the modeler and reenactor. The info is concise and the plates and images are invaluable to help put together any reproduction. There are so many to choose from it makes the head spin, but they're worth the purchase.

Look for similar items by category