| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Although some sections are stronger than others, The Culture of Fear's examination of many nonproblems--such as "road rage," "Internet addiction," and airline safety--is very good. Glassner also has a sharp eye for what causes unnecessary goose bumps: "The use of poignant anecdotes in place of scientific evidence, the christening of isolated incidents as trends, depictions of entire categories of people as innately dangerous," and unknown scholars who masquerade as "experts." Although Glassner rejects the notion that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself, he certainly shows we have much less to fear than we think. And isn't that sort of scary? --John J. Miller --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Glassner explains how the media ignores statistics and common sense in order to fill the airwaves and the printed word with scare tactics. He explains how the media, influenced by political groups and human interest stories, ignore the big picture and focus on anecdotal evidence in order to sell their fear. He provides many examples of this, from airplane crashes to vaccines, and explains how these unfounded fears come about. He carefully uses both concrete evidence and statistics to prove the media wrong, and explains why and how the media choose to report the way they do.
Unfortunately, for people like me who already agree with him, it doesn't provide much new information. Also, when he talks of the media, he talks of the supply side. He rarely mentions the demand side. Why is such media is actually being watched, and why are consumers falling for this, hook, line, and sinker?
Finally, the writing style is not altogether fluid. It's hard to describe, but it's not a real page turner.
All in all, it's a good book. It'll either confirm what you already know, or be an eye opener.
Barry Glassner does an excellent job of taking false statistics and exaggerated television reports and exposing them for what they really are: fraudulent mediums to increase profits and to increase control over American mindsets.
One thing that Michael Moore and Barry Glassner do not have in common is this: Barry Glassner doesn't seem to be making an attempt to blatantly manipulate his audience. Glassner did a thorough investigation and covered all areas of his subject, finding a plethora of information to support his thesis rather than a few mere tidbits. His research was well-founded and his argument is both convincing and trustworthy. I can't say the same for all of Michael Moore's work.
A must-read.
(Just a side note: For as much as I hate the media, I find it interesting that the only way I became aware of this book was actually through the media - i.e. Michael Moore's movie "Bowling for Columbine." Moore used the media in order to tell his audience that the media is the reason that they're so afraid of everything. Don't you just love irony?)
|