Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Death Penalty Debate: Two Opposing Views of Capitol Punishment
  

The Death Penalty Debate: Two Opposing Views of Capitol Punishment [Paperback]

H. Wayne House , John Howard Yoder


Available from these sellers.



Product Details

  • Paperback: 280 pages
  • Publisher: W Pub Group (July 1991)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0849933072
  • ISBN-13: 978-0849933073
  • Product Dimensions: 22.6 x 15.2 x 1.8 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 340 g
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #719,582 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
Share your experience with this product with others
Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)

5 of 9 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Enjoyed seeing this issue discussed from Biblical standpoint, Mar 25 2001
By Craig Childs - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Death Penalty Debate: Two Opposing Views of Capitol Punishment (Paperback)
This book presented opposing viewponts on capital punishment from two prominent Biblical theologians. While I did not agree with either theologian on all points, this somewhat overly scholarly debate did help me reexamine my own beliefs and determine why I believe what I believe.

Dr. House argued that capital punishment is not only condoned but also commanded by God in the Old Testament, and he used New Testament passages to affirm those commands were universal and unchanging. His arguments relied heavily on his interpretion of Genesis 9 (the Noachian Covenant) as a universal mandate establishing God's relationship to man, and man's relationship to each other. Unfortunately, I felt he took the "easy" way out by claiming that the entire Mosaic Law had been invalidated by Christ and therefore was not relevant to his case. I think a more fair analysis would have been to divide the Mosaic Laws into moral, religous, and legal subcomponents and deal with each separately.

Dr. Yoder used a standard "Christ-transforming-culture" argument to assert that God's acceptance of capital punishment has changed from Biblical times to today. The themes of Christ's teachings have helped evolve modern culture past the need for retribution-based systems of punishment (i.e., some Scriptures have to be interpreted in terms of the cultural bias of its authors). Yoder explains away the Noachian Covenant as a reflection of an obsolete era and basis his arguments primarily on John 8, where Jesus pardons an alduteress about to be stoned to death.

I really enjoyed seeing this contemporary issue discussed from Scriptural postions. Both men made interesting arguments, but I felt Dr. Yoder did not respect or believe in the infallibility of Scripture and tried to use secular sources (modern psychology and social science) to bend his interpretations.

 Go to Amazon.com to see the review  4.0 out of 5 stars 

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback