The God Delusion Paperback – Jan 1 2008
|New from||Used from|
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
From Publishers Weekly
The antireligion wars started by Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris will heat up even more with this salvo from celebrated Oxford biologist Dawkins. For a scientist who criticizes religion for its intolerance, Dawkins has written a surprisingly intolerant book, full of scorn for religion and those who believe. But Dawkins, who gave us the selfish gene, anticipates this criticism. He says it's the scientist and humanist in him that makes him hostile to religions—fundamentalist Christianity and Islam come in for the most opprobrium—that close people's minds to scientific truth, oppress women and abuse children psychologically with the notion of eternal damnation. While Dawkins can be witty, even confirmed atheists who agree with his advocacy of science and vigorous rationalism may have trouble stomaching some of the rhetoric: the biblical Yahweh is "psychotic," Aquinas's proofs of God's existence are "fatuous" and religion generally is "nonsense." The most effective chapters are those in which Dawkins calms down, for instance, drawing on evolution to disprove the ideas behind intelligent design. In other chapters, he attempts to construct a scientific scaffolding for atheism, such as using evolution again to rebut the notion that without God there can be no morality. He insists that religion is a divisive and oppressive force, but he is less convincing in arguing that the world would be better and more peaceful without it. (Oct. 18)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
"A resounding trumpet blast for truth . . . It feels like coming up for air." --Matt Ridley, author of Genome and Francis Crick
"Dawkins gives human sympathies and emotions their proper value, which...lends his criticisms of religion such force." --Philip Pullman, author of His Dark Materials trilogy
"This is a brave and important book." --Desmond Morris, author of The Naked Ape and The Human Animal
"Richard Dawkins is the leading soothsayer of our time. . . . The God Delusion continues his thought-provoking tradition." --J. Craig Venter, decoder of the human genome
"The God Delusion is smart, compassionate, and true . . . If this book doesn't change the world, we're all screwed." --Penn & Teller
This is exceptional reading." Kirkus Reviews, Starred
"The world needs . . . passionate rationalists . . . Richard Dawkins so stands out through the cutting intelligence of The God Delusion." --James D. Watson, co-discoverer of DNA, author of The Double Helix
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
It is not easy accepting, let alone contemplating, that you may have been wrong your whole life. But it is much better than deluding yourself into believing something you know that you doubt. Into my early twenties, I began to resent religion as a whole. It hadn't made me a 'bad' person per-se, but I wasted a lot of energy in my younger years praying and fearing this apparent eternal damnation that was the apparent fate for my friends and extended family. And when I am completely honest, it also negatively influenced me in the following ways: I had naivety towards critical thinking, hostility towards other religions, narrow-mindedness in debates, homophobia, and sexual fear & repression.
And then recently, in the last two years, I knew I seriously doubted there being any god whatsoever. I am happy to say that Dawkins confirmed that doubt, and I found his arguments credible, thorough, and coherent. Some people remark that there is an arrogant undertone---but honestly, I think he has every right to have some arrogance in his arguments which are thoroughly well-supported.Read more ›
In this book, Dawkins tackles the problem of religion -- and he does see it as a problem. Dawkins begins by pointing out that there is no evidence whatsoever of god. True, he cannot prove that god does not exist, but the same is true of all possible gods, including Zeus and Wotan. The fact that something cannot be proven false is no evidence whatsoever that is true.
Dawkins further points out how religion (or, more precisely, faith) is so damaging. Faith is, quite simply, the enemy of reason. If one believes something on faith then, by definition, it does not matter what the evidence shows, one will still believe. It is a matter of faith. No matter how strong the evidence of evolution, for example, many faithful simply refuse to believe. With faith, there is no argument, no evidence good enough. With reason, one will still make mistakes, but at least one is trying to get it right.
Dawkins believes very strongly in what he says, but that does not make him just another fundamentalist. Dawkins came to his beliefs by looking at evidence, considering all arguments and applying reason. If, tomorrow, one presented him with evidence that he was wrong, he would change his mind.
This book will offend many readers, but that is not what Dawkins intends and it only proves his point: readers who are offended have been so blinded by religion that they are unable to consider that they might be wrong without suffering pain.
For an explanation of how evolution works, read Dawkins' The Blind Watchmaker.Read more ›
Most recent customer reviews
I found him angry? He has a right to his opinion as we all do but I didn't find the book productive.
He sounds a touch intolerant.
absolutely everyone needs this...absolutely. no delusion here.Published 9 days ago by Dr. Doug Powers
I enjoy reading the common sense approach to the non existent gods.Published 13 days ago by Mike Schoonbaert
Don't waste your time reading this. Dawkins tries to pass off his delusions as fact, and fails miserably.Published 1 month ago by Dawn L.
One of Dawkins' strengths, and true to scientific form, is that he very meticulously defines his terms and the scope of his arguments. Read morePublished 2 months ago by Phil