|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
|
Product Description
Review
Luttwak has done scholarship an immense service... Every page brings detailed insights into the working of Roman military organization, in strategy and tactics. -- E. Badian New York Review of Books Lucidly and vigorously written. Times Literary Supplement
Product Description
'A fascinating book, well written and forcefully argued...Luttwak's formulations are as refreshing as they are convincing...He has done for Roman historians what they have not done for themselves.' -Z. Yavetz, New Republic
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
In our own disordered times, it is natural to look back for comfort and instruction to the experience of Roman imperial statecraft. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
In our own disordered times, it is natural to look back for comfort and instruction to the experience of Roman imperial statecraft. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
An excellent overview of Roman imperial strategy,
By mike esposito "espo" (Morton Grove, IL United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third (Paperback)
This is a unique work in that it tries to explain an overall strategic picture of Roman Imperial defense through the principate and into the turbulent third century when the empire as a political entity was in real jepordy of being swept away by internal and external threats. In somewhat technical terms, he goes on to explain how Roman Imperial security evolved over time starting with the early principate. Then going into the Flavian, Antonine and Severan eras. Luttwak does a great job in outlining the threat, security measures and strategies of each different era. Extensive notes allow for additional study. Even though written almost 30 years ago, it is still very relevant. It is striking how simmilar the strategic problems faced by ancient Rome are today faced by the U.S. My only critisism is that he does not go into any detail of internal security measures or how these relate to strategic defense. Otherwise an excellent work.
3.0 out of 5 stars
Only for the specialist.,
By
This review is from: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third (Paperback)
Only a small part of this book is for the layman: the analysis of the military strategy of the Roman emperor's.Rome changed its strategy in the 1st century from attack to containment, based on puppet regimes and subsidies. The tactics were to frighten and threat by diplomatic means, and not to intervene violently. The author states cleverly that the Roman soldier was absolutely not interested in fighting but only in making a career and in receiving a pension after his service. The other part is only for specialists. It gives a detailed dissection of the structure of the Roman army (e.g. how many men contained a cohort).
4.0 out of 5 stars
Inferior Numbers to Bear,
By Holy Olio "holy_olio" (Grand Rapids, MI USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third (Paperback)
Even in decline, Rome held on to most of the territory staked out by Augustus (and a bit more), for two centuries. Luttwak's analysis of the Roman army structure illuminates how a single city managed to impose its own order on a substantial fraction of the world's population, stretching from northern England to the Persian Gulf at its greatest extent, while employing a fairly small army of 300,000 to 500,000 infantry, cavalry, and mariners.In a rare display of historical trivia, one of the minor characters in the wonderfully dreadful Liz Taylor version of _Cleopatra_ remarked on how Caesar had arrived "with so few men". Luttwak explains the strategic vision that made that possible. The same strategy has been arrived at (or stumbled onto) by later powers, while others have staggered under too much militarization. The USSR relied on ever-larger piles of weapons, huge standing armies, and proxy warfare outside its borders. That played a role in its demise, as did its failure in Afghanistan. Britain used a strategy similar to Rome's (and superior weapons) to conquer and rule a worldwide empire. The US uses a hybrid strategy to contain its enemies, build reliable alliances, and protect its interests. Superior weapons have also played a part in the US approach. Rome on the other hand had to rely on discipline and tactics, because it didn't generally have superior weaponry to bring to bear. As others have pointed out, Roman equipment would from time to time leave Roman legions at a disadvantage (lack of a stirrup for example). Relatively few will read this. Ancient history and warfare buffs should be among its readers.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
|
Most recent customer reviews |
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
