The Last Assault: 1944 - Battle of the Bulge Re-assessed [Hardcover]

Charles Whiting (Author)

Price:	CDN$ 28.15 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
	o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.

	Amazon Price	New from	Used from
Hardcover	CDN $28.15	--	--
See # more hardcovers

Product Details

Hardcover: 256 pages
Publisher: Pen & Sword Books Ltd; illustrated edition edition (August 1994)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 085052380X
ISBN-13: 978-0850523805
Product Dimensions: 23.4 x 16.2 x 2.8 cm
Shipping Weight: 581 g

Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

Product Description

From Publishers Weekly

In treating the Battle of the Bulge in the forests of the Ardennes in 1944, Whiting (Bloody Aachen) is best at the tactical level, offering a well-written narrative focusing on the hard fight made by the survivors of the overrun 106th Infantry Division, and on the weeklong stand at St. Vith that broke the back of the German attack. His argument, based on inferential reconstructions from archival sources, is unconvincing that Dwight Eisenhower knew of the planned offensive, deliberately weakened the Ardennes sector to draw Hitler's last reserves into a killing ground, then orchestrated a postwar cover-up of a decision so costly in American lives. The initial German successes are still best explained by the combination of intelligence failures and U.S. numerical weakness described in Charles MacDonald's definitive The Battle of the Bulge. (1984). Illustrations.

--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Book Description

On 16th December 1944 Hitler launched his great assault on the West. In what became known as the Battle of the Bulge, three American divisions tried to stop three German armies, but within a week those divisions were decimated and the "surprise" German counter-attack developed into the greatest land-battle fought by the US in this century. But was it a surprise counter-attack, as Eisenhower always claimed? This reassessment of the battle contains evidence which indicates that the American Supreme Commander deliberately used the three divisions at the front as bait to lure the Germans out of their Siegfried Line fortifications. The price was high; 20,000 young Americans were killed, captured or wounded, and half a century later the author found when researching for this book that, despite the US Freedom of Information Act, doors were closed to him.

Tag this product

(What's this?)

Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca

5 star:		(0)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

Share your experience with this product with others

Create your own review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com ^(beta)

Amazon.com: 4.5 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful

4.0 out of 5 stars Conspiracy Theories in the Ardennes, Sep 30 1998

By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com

This review is from: The Last Assault: The Battle of the Bulge Reassessed (Hardcover)

Charles Whiting prefaces his work with his prior belief that all the secretes of World War II had been discovered. With the official release of some previously classified documents, including ULTRA decriptions and other sources the very existence of which had been denied until recently, Whiting found what he believes to be a previously undiscovered secret: SHAEF knew about the impending Ardennes Offensive. Not only did Eisenhower do nothing to prevent the assault, he welcomed it as a means of engaging the tattered remains of the Wermacht outside the nearly impenetrable fortifications of the West Wall.

As with other conspiracy theories (Area 54, J.F. Kennedy, etc.), once the theory is fashioned, it is easy to find facts supporting it. However, many of Whiting's points are compelling. Although Eisenhower had little or no ULTRA intelligence about the offensive, MAGIC was intercepting and decoding an astounding number of messages from the Japanese ambassador which outlined the location and time of the assault. Furthermore, there is no question that Eisenhower's staff, notably Omar Bradley, had spoken about the advantages to a German assault in Belgium as early as October, 1944.

Whiting's theory, naturally, is less than solid. For example, he fails satisfactorily to explain his opinions as to the reasons why Eisenhower's "plan" failed. Was it that Ike never expected the 106th to put up any resistance? Did he not foresee the German assault bottling up at St. Vith? Did he not realize the heroic defense of Bastogne would create headlines? Nevertheless, as any frequent reader of Whiting's writing can attest, his work is a compelling read. If the theory were advanced for critical review, far more detail and supporting documentation would be necessary. As it is, much of the book is devoted to historical narrative about the Ardennes Offensive -- itself interesting.

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful

5.0 out of 5 stars Ike as diabolical plotter, Jan 25 2000

By WD Grissom - Published on Amazon.com

This review is from: The Last Assault: 1944 - Battle of the Bulge Re-assessed (Hardcover)

This reader usually finds source-footnotes to be boring and irrelevant, but when grave accusations are made against a major historical figure, their absence lowers the value of the allegations to little more than tabloid level.

Whiting, described on the dust-jacket as "a prolific author of war fiction", finds the conventional interpretations of the Ardennes Offensive to be the products of conspiracies and coverups, and the considerable American losses to be the result of Eisenhower's "evil, ill-conceived" strategy to lure the Germans out of their Seigfried Line. How Ike was able to direct the maniacal generalship of Hitler is not explained.

The author's account of the battle is interesting when it focuses on the experiences of the ill-fated U.S. 28th and 106th Divisions, but it cannot be accepted as serious military history.
(The rating stars are a requirement of the site and are disavowed. This reviewer dos not "rate" books.)

› Go to Amazon.com to see both reviews 4.5 out of 5 stars