Auto boutiques-francophones Simple and secure cloud storage Personal Care Cook All-New Kindle Paperwhite Explore the Amazon.ca Vinyl LP Records Store NFL Tools
The Last Disciple and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
CDN$ 14.45
  • List Price: CDN$ 18.99
  • You Save: CDN$ 4.54 (24%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
The Last Disciple has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

The Last Disciple Paperback – Apr 19 2012


See all 6 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 14.45
CDN$ 6.90 CDN$ 4.66

Unlimited FREE Two-Day Shipping for Six Months When You Try Amazon Student


Frequently Bought Together

The Last Disciple + The Last Temple + The Last Sacrifice
Price For All Three: CDN$ 43.44

Buy the selected items together



Product Details

  • Paperback: 448 pages
  • Publisher: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.; Reprint edition (April 18 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1414364970
  • ISBN-13: 978-1414364971
  • Product Dimensions: 20.8 x 13.7 x 3 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 363 g
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #190,684 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

From Publishers Weekly

Tyndale House, the publisher of the Left Behind books, the megaselling Christian series about the end times, now presents a new series with a very different interpretation of biblical prophecy. Christian radio-show host Hanegraaff and bestselling CBA novelist Brouwer take readers back to the time of Nero in the first century. As the Roman Empire ruthlessly persecutes Christians, the novel's warrior-hero, Vitas, tries to defend them. But even Vitas can't prevent the destruction of the Jewish Temple—the historical event that sits at the center of this novel. Hanegraaff and Brouwer posit that the Book of Revelation, in code, predicted Roman persecution and the Temple's fall; subsequent novels in the series presumably will walk readers through the rest of Revelation, tying historical events to biblical prophecy. This is, to be sure, middle-brow genre fiction, and not an especially shining specimen thereof. The prose is plodding, with far too many dramatic sentence fragments and a conventional plot. The dialogue tends toward the unsubtly didactic (" 'Jesus, then, uses this rich symbolism?' Darda nodded.... 'You said John was obviously educated. Can you make any other guesses about him?' 'John verges on genius.' ") Despite the series' many flaws, readers who are hungry for apocalyptic fiction may embrace it, though it remains to be seen whether they'll find a first-century apocalypse as gripping as Left Behind's 21st-century one.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Jon Dykstra on Oct. 1 2004
Format: Hardcover
This is the first in an series of books based on the premise that the Bible book Revelation was written before the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD, and that, consequently, the Great Tribulation described in John's book actually occurred already in the first century AD. This is a very different interpretation than the one promoted in the Left Behind series of books, and it seems to be more likely true.
The story includes a large cast of characters so it is not the type of book you can read slowly a bit at a time over a number of weeks (if you do, you'll start forgetting who some of the characters are). The story is intriguing, and will interest any who like historical fiction and any who want to find out more about an alternate interpretation of Revelation.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
By christianfictionaddiction TOP 500 REVIEWER on July 4 2012
Format: Paperback
Set in first-century Rome, The Last Disciple weaves together the stories of Gallus Sergius Vitas, a man within the inner circle of Emperor Nero, with the lives of Christians who are experiencing ever-greater persecution for their beliefs. Vitas has committed to serve justice equally for all, and is no longer able to stand by as Nero carries out horrific acts against Christian believers, or while other Roman rulers plunder and steal to their own benefit. Vitas sets out to Jerusalem to investigate the rule of Judea under Florus, the Roman procurator, and ends up witnessing first-hand the mistreatment of the Jews when Florus uses the Roman army to cover up his own abuses. When Vitas returns to Rome to give his report, it is discovered that he has married a Christian, a sect Nero has become increasingly focused on wiping out. Meanwhile, a divine prophecy has emerged from Jesus' last disciple, John, concerning a revelation he received, a revelation that appears to threaten Nero's reign. Nero's closest allies become consumed with deciphering the meaning of the prophecy, while events unfold that place Vitas' very life at risk, along with the lives of those he most holds dear.

Sigmund Brouwer and Hank Hanegraaff have woven a riveting tale, one that has been painted with vivid imagery and haunting details. The characters are well-fleshed out, with much to admire in such persons as Vitas or Sophia or the last disciple, John, but also characters who are so sinister that I shudder to imagine that they actually existed. The historical setting of Rome under the rule of Emperor Nero, combined with his ruthless persecution of Christians, makes for a compelling read, equally entertaining and disturbing at the same time.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I really enjoy both of these authors in different ways. Brouwer is an excellent writer and storyteller. Hank is has written some great books on Bible interpretation (Apocalypse Code) and has a radio program.

There are interesting twists, great action, and the gospel message found within. A historical perspective on Revelation.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 155 reviews
81 of 83 people found the following review helpful
How the pendulum in reviews seem to swing over time... Feb. 12 2005
By Jonathan - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
It is hard not to notice that recent "decline" in rating for this product. Quite curious, seeing that nothing but 5-star ratings were given near the beginning, and there has been a plethora of 1-star ratings (which coincidentally have been unanimously checked as "helpful"). In case my innuendos are not clear, I'm suggesting that an indiviudal or a group of like-minded individuals have been giving this product bad ratings. While I don't know what their motive is, I would imagine that it has something to do with their dislike for the authors or the eschatological position delineated in the book. This is disappointing, and I really hope that reviewers examine this trend before being discouraged from purchasing this book.

AS for the book itself, I believe it was entertaining fiction. It has a complex story line, and it took a great deal of time to see the characters intermingle. In fact, there are still many questions unanswered specifically to interlude the next book in the series. Ultimately, the book was solid and the theology is fully acceptable in orthodox Christianity. Some of the reviewers criticizing the eschatology in this book should research exactly what partial preterism is, and what it entails. While I am inclined to argue that partial preterism makes AT LEAST as much sense as futurism, that is not what a review for this book should encompass. But for the sake of other reviewers, it must be noted that partial preterism is not this heretical nonsense that other reviews might suggest. At least research the subject with an open mind if you are in debate about this (don't take my word or that of an opposing review).

I recommend this book. It is outstanding fiction and corroborates historical fact. Brouwer is a talented writer and the eschataogical position posited by Hanegraaff is plausible (not flawless, but no more so than all other eschatological positions). I would encourage anyone who is considering purchasing this book to do so. Finally, if my review tends to have the "helpful" question answered in the negative, please do not feel my opinion is rendered useless because of this. If you honestly feel that way, I'd rather you come to that conclusion on your own.
158 of 176 people found the following review helpful
At Last! A Preterist End Times Novel! Oct. 13 2004
By John Fuller - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This book was published 9/30/04; it showed up in my local library 10/7/04. I picked it up and read the intro page to the first section and two words jumped out at me - "Tribulation" and "65AD". Wow! An end times series that actually gets the theology right. I checked it out immediately and read it on two plane flights over the next four days.

Left Behind has been left behind. Hannegraaff has it over LaHaye on the theology and Brouwer has it over Jenkins on the narrative. This was a thoroughly enjoyable read, although as other reviewers have noted, it is highly episodic and jumps around between scenes a lot, therefore requiring careful attention. But the characters are credible, synpathetic and have rational motivations, unlike Jenkins' wooden stereotypes. I did however have a hard time accepting Queen Bernice as a good character, given the negative portrayal of her in the Bible and her well-known incestuousness. But it worked. Other historical persons were well presented (principally Gessius Florus, governor of Judea, and to a lesser extent, John, Nero and various members of the Jewish priesthood). The plot was strong, and to the degree that a series novel can be resolved, it was, cleverly.

The story rests on two fundamental ideas - 1) That Revelation was written prior to the sack of Jerusalem; and 2) That Nero was the Beast of John's Apocalypse. These are also the foundation of the theology known as preterism.

What is preterism, you ask? Simply the school of Biblical interpretation that holds that all or nearly all Biblical prophecies were fulfilled within the lifetime of the generation of Jesus, culminating in the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 70AD. It stands in stark contrast to the futurist interpretation, whose name is self-explanatory and which arises from (largely aberrant) dispensationalism. Hannegraaff doesn't refer to it that way, though - in the afterword he describes it as "Exegetical Eschatology" and goes on to show an example of why the ideas behind Left Behind are wrong. The novel itself explains why Nero is the most likely candidate for the Beast of Revelation and argues that any self-respecting 1st century Jew would have known almost immediately that his was the name behind 666. From this it becomes clear that Revelation, if interpreted correctly by the Roman authorities, was a very dangerous book to possess.

Now I doubtless have to wait ages for the next installment...
69 of 76 people found the following review helpful
excellent biblical thriller Sept. 29 2004
By Harriet Klausner - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
In 65 AD Nero rules Rome with an iron fist; since the Great Fire he persecutes Christians who refuse to accept that he is divine blaming the inferno on them. Vilas, a trusted advisor, knows the emperor is mad, and does his best to curb the worst of the excesses. He especially tries to save Christians who Nero is about to kill. Believers of Christ think Nero is the Beast and this is the time of the tribulation.

Vilas is sick of war and the blood on his hands so he goes to Jerusalem to report on the Roman in charge of Judea, who is thought to have committed crimes against the Empire. In Judea, Vilas asks Sophia, the former Jewish slave he freed, to marry him although she is Christian and he is part of Nero's inner circle. They agree to hide her religion when they return to Rome as a married couple. However, Vilas has enemies who see his wife as the instrument to destroy him. At the same time, John the Revelator who is the last living disciple is in danger as he comforts incarcerated Christians. John and Vilas meet as both flee the wrath of the Beast.

THE LAST DISCIPLE depicts Nero as the Beast of Revelations as he persecutes Christians. The period is when people still living can provide eye witness accounts about the miracles Jesus performed. Vilas is a terrific representative of the age as he tries to remain loyal to the Empire, but detests the ruler he believes is destroying it. Much historical information is included in this biblical thriller so that readers obtain a taste of life in the first decades following the crucifixion in Rome and Judea, which makes for an enthralling read.

Harriet Klausner
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful
loved it July 9 2012
By Mark B - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Tyndale has put new covers on this series and re-published them. I didn't read them the first time around, but decided to give it a try this time around. I sat down to read the first book, The Last Disciple, last night, and wonder now why I waited so long to read these books.

The authors go with the idea that the Tribulation talked about in the book of Revelation has already happened in the first century when Nero was emperor. I don't agree with that premise, but I still enjoyed the book. The authors did a great job describing what happened and may have happened during that time period. I was pulled into the story and could almost see the streets of Rome and Jerusalem and other places they described.

The book was also sobering as it described what kind of person Nero was and how he persecuted the Christians. Although this would be classified as Historical Fiction, books like this should be a warning to Christians to be more careful about who they vote for, even in local elections, as this country is fast heading down the road to being anti-Christian.

I liked the characters in the book, and am looking forward to reading more about them in the next book in the series.
26 of 30 people found the following review helpful
For the sake of argument, a great book! May 7 2005
By jasonc65 - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I'm like Hank. I don't like to be labeled. But if I came out of the closet, I would probably say I was pretribulational dispensationalist. I am aware that there are many unanswered questions that that model has, but if you are looking for a model that answers all the questions and does not pop up a host of new questions that can't be answered, you may as well give up. Hank certainly doesn't have it, either.

I am disappointed to find that Hank is not able to deal with why Revelation prophesies things in specific detail if it is not literal: things like locusts with stings, darkness, blood, reminders of the plagues that literally plagued Egypt (recall that Hank is always reminding the reader that Revelation recalls the Old Testament) and a new age in which believers reign with Christ followed by another unleashing of Satan. I sympathize deeply with Hank's hankering for metaphors that enable us to relate to prophecy in ways in which mere words would be inaccurate to describe, but I don't see how such metaphors alone could account for the specific claims that the text makes.

I am also becoming increasingly uneasy with how Hank deals with callers who have questions relating to methodology. He seems to be too dismissive of various literal interpretations of passages, and as he sounds dismissive, he sometimes sounds quite dogmatic. I'm always hearing that the blessed hope of the believer is not the "rapture", as if the word "rapture" implicitly had "pretrib" attached to it. It seems obvious to me that the blessed hope is both that the believer will be resurrected and that our present tribulations will not be forever. Deliverance from tribulation is a recurrent theme in scripture; one may argue about whether it means the pretrib rapture, indeed God's acts of protection specifically mentioned in Revelation are also instances in which God does not put believers through wrath, but one dare not say that God capriciously desires we go through tribulation with no hope of deliverance. It is interesting that Harold Camping uses the word "rapture" a hundred times in his sensational "1994", even though he is certainly not pre-trib! Obviously, rapture does not mean pre-trib rapture, and while whether pretrib rapture is scriptural is debatable, whether rapture is taught in scripture certainly is not. I hate it when I hear Hank continually denounce the very word "rapture" itself, as if that were a bad sign. It irritates me to no end to see the graphic language Paul uses to describe believers being taken to heaven with Jesus being stripped of its meaning. There may be some cloud metaphors used in scripture, but we know that there is at least one intance where clouds are literal, and that is at Jesus' assension. There, it is said that Jesus would return the same way he left.

Anyway, before I forget that this review is about the book, let me point out that there seems to be no end of examples like this where Hank irritates me; and it is not because he is not a dispensationalist, but because in some ways, he actually manages to demolish some common ground. These traits seem to keep coming up every time another caller asks about eschatology. And personally, I'm being made to feel silly that I ever bought into a literal thousand-year reign of Christ, as if I should have known better.

One thing that really irks me about preterism, even partial, is that it tends to explain away second coming passages as "70 AD" passages. Gradually, one by one, you lose warrant for the second coming, as piece by piece of evidence for it is explained away. I feel that this is a slippery slope that leads in the end to the heresy of full preterism. I can't help reading Matthew 24 and related passages and feeling that I'm getting glimpses of both 70 AD and the far future. In Revelation, Christ's coming is always being spoken about as coming "quickly" and bringing rewards to faithful believers in its wake. In fact, I think the second coming is even a code-breaker on par with the Old Testament when it comes to reading Revelation. I think it is very difficult to divorce Revelation from the second coming and what it entails. Even as I meditate on Rev 3:10, I am reminded that Jesus promised he would come quickly and bring his rewards with him, that he warned another congregation that if some of their members did not repent, they would soon find themselves in a bed of tribulation, or a heap of trouble to use modern vernacular, and that the plagues that the book will later discribe are simply staggering, even in comparison with the plagues of Egypt.

Then there is the early dating/late dating thing. Hank's argument for the early dating of Revelation is very disarming. To be honest, I myself don't understand why John would not mention the destruction of the temple, but that is more than overwhelmed by the late dating of the conditions of the seven churches. It is simply not likely that around 65 AD, seven churches in Asia minor would have had time to develop as widely diverging characteristics as the text describes, one of them, particular Ephesis, having gone through many changes since Paul had first written to them. By 95 AD, it is more than likely. Also, even if Revelation is written before 70 AD, one would have to wonder why John isn't continually reminding his reader that the temple is going to be destroyed with its prophesied destruction getting nearer. And the fact that a temple is mentioned in Revelation could be interpreted variously as: metaphorically, as indicating the reality in heaven of which the earthly temple is only a shadow, as speaking of things to come, or as speaking of things that have already happened. And no matter how you interpret that one particular passage, it is the only time the temple is ever mentioned. Obviously, Revelation is not a gospel account, and it does not have to read like one. It does not need to dwell on historical events with "this was to fulfill..." clauses attached, simply because it's in a different genre altogether. It is, after all, prophecy, and it serves the purpose of both foretelling and forthtelling.

Besides interpreting Revelation, "Last Disciple" also tries to give an accurate impression of the first century. I am never certain which characters in the book are to be taken as literal and which ones are fictional. It is hard to find anyone else who agrees strongly with Hank that Nero is definitely the Anti-Christ, and at times I think he is too dogmatic. I have developed a fondness for Vitas, and yet I don't believe he's real at all. Never before have I ever gotten any impression that a first century Roman general was ever conciencious about Rome's imperialism or ever tried to "postmodernize" or "enlighten" the empire. As much as I loved the story, I must say that such impressions are misleading. I also find the situation between Vitas and Sophia getting unequally yoked to be morally ambiguous. If Hank and Sigmund write something like that, then they shouldn't be worried about the morally ambiguous fantasy books that are now popular. For in neither case does it do to expect characters to be always perfect.

One thing that impressed me the most was the insight the relationship between Israel and Rome. It makes it easier to understand why Caiaphas would say it was better to let Jesus die, and why Jesus would hold up a roman coin to remind them of their ties to Rome.

I am glad to have a new fascination with the historical character or Nero aroused. It was interesting to read "The Austere Academy", the fifth in the Snicket Series, in light of what I learned.

After all the misgivings that I have about both the history and the eschatology inherant in the book, I would say it is a good thing. It encourages debate, and it engages the reader in productive thinking. I only wish Hank would allow Norman Geisler on his show to give his defense of dispensationalism and to encourage debate. After all, he's written an excellent response to "Last Disciple". And when's that book "E^2" coming out?


Feedback