Most helpful customer reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Ruhlman didn't really ATTEND the CIA, Feb 18 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: The Making of a Chef: Mastering Heat at the Culinary Institute of America (Paperback)
Though rather simplistic and lacking in depth, Ruhlman's representation of the school and its students was accurate as far as it went. His descriptions of food were less than appealing, and the truth of the matter is that though Ruhlman did audit some classes at the CIA, he categorically DID NOT attend the school. I was a student at the CIA during Ruhlman's romantic, starry-eyed journey into the life of a culinary student, and although he attended classes periodically, he did so strictly from the point of view of a writer. He was not tested, did not take a class in its entirety, did not have thousands of tuition dollars riding on his first and fourth term practical exams, buddied up with the chefs, and was wined and dined by the Institute's administration. In order to accurately write the book, Ruhlman should have attended the CIA just like any other student, without drawing so much attention to himself, struggled to spend 8 to 12 hours a day at the school while also supporting himself financially. He should have lost precious points because his tie wasn't straight, his knives weren't sharp enough, his hair was sticking out of his toque or his sideburns were too long. He should have felt the real pressure the REAL chefs in training felt every day when they walked through the doors of a new kitchen to start from scratch with a chef whose reputation would make him nauseous a full week before he even started class. I don't have a problem with writers getting a cursory view and writing their impressions of something, and I'm certain people would have enjoyed (or not enjoyed) this book just as much had Ruhlman more accurately described his "attendance" at the CIA. Those of us who went through the entire culinary program and survived would tell a much different tale. Ruhlman should have respected all of us enough to at least let the general public know that his experience at the CIA was vastly different than that of the real students at The Culinary Institute of America.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Accurate Portrayal of Life at the C.I.A., Jun 25 2004
This review is from: The Making of a Chef: Mastering Heat at the Culinary Institute of America (Paperback)
As a proud graduate of the Culinary Institute of America, and having attended the C.I.A. at the same time as the author, I can attest to the accuracy of this book. I had several of the same chef/instructors as did the author. (That's Certified Master Chef Ron DiSantis, a culinary badass, in the foreground of the cover photo) The book shows the demanding schedule required of those who wish to attend the hands down best cooking school in America, and possibly the world. It should be required reading for all who want to cook for a living. I like that Ruhlman goes into detail about the life philosophy of "Mise en Place", French for Things in Place. The term, in its strictest sense, means to have all of your ingredients chopped up and arranged logically, all of your pots, pans, and utensils ready to go. In a more general way, it means to be organized and professional. Good term, that. Anyway, it's a good peek into the kitchen. Enjoy!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Superior Journalistic Look at a Facinating Subject, Mar 18 2004
This review is from: The Making of a Chef: Mastering Heat at the Culinary Institute of America (Paperback)
This 1997 second book by journalist Michael Ruhlman is his first of several essays and collaborations in writing about the upper reaches of the American culinary scene. The most fascinating thing about the book is in learning with Ruhlman, as an outsider to the culinary profession, exactly how demanding a job in the culinary arts can be. What is taken as a matter of course by people like Daniel Boulud and Jaques Pepin comes as a surprise to outsider Ruhlman. The surprise is in the commitment to performance which chefs are expected to make to maintain a service to their customers. The book is a reporting on Ruhlman's taking an abbreviated version of the full curriculum at the Culinary Institute of America (CIA), where only the President of the school and a few select senior instructors know of the author's real role at the school. This means that when the author did attend classes, he attended the full class, from start to finish, and was expected to perform as well as any other student. While the CIA has many of the appearances of a liberal arts college, it is much closer in practice to a trade school. One symptom of this is that the stocks produced by the basic kitchen skills classes are then used by other classes at the school and they are used by each of the four restaurants run by the school for students, faculty, and outside guests. In a sense, this is a mix of trade school and graduate school, where it is expected that no one will do work worthy of a grade less than a B-. The epiphany that reveals how serious the culinary profession is about uninterrupted service comes early in the first year when the school is hit by a serious snowstorm and the author considers whether or not he should attempt the difficult trek into the school. The great revelation is that the school and the instructor of Ruhlman's class on that occasion did not expect it to be above and beyond the call of duty to make it to class, and they would have not thought twice about lowering Ruhlman's grade had he been a true, full time student. When I left school, I was surprised at how much easier life at a job was compared to life in school. I am sure that had a lot to do with the fact that I entered a largely intellectual avocation where so much about how things are done and how long they will take can change from job to job and even lowly technicians are give some opening to contribute to setting target dates. Culinary trades are a much different kettle of fish, literally. In a professional kitchen, the line cook is totally at the mercy of who happens to walk into the restaurant that day, and how many people walk into the restaurant that day, and at what time. The challenge is to prepare so well and exercise one's skills so often that making six or eight different dishes to perfection at a sauté station becomes second nature. Since it is the job of the CIA to teach you how to do that, the classes can be very demanding. The first 30% of the book covers the introductory class on basic skills and the main character is the instructor of that class. The last 30% of the book covers time spent in two of the CIA's four practice restaurants. The middle of the book covers experiences in specialized classes for Garde Manger, baking, and other specialities. If you do not already know the serious difference between savory cooking and baking, the books chapter describing the baking class will clear this up in a big hurry. I confess that I am very fond of this type of book. To me it represents a successful presentation of material that reality TV shows can never hope to achieve. The paradigm for this kind of writing is Tracy Kidder's book 'The Soul of a New Machine', to which I would favorably compare this work. You should find it doubly interesting if, as I do, you have an interest in the how and why of the culinary arts and personalities. Very highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|