7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Oversimplified, confused and inaccurate, Feb 16 2002
I knew Paul Erdos since I was a small child. I consider that this book, and, even more, the blurb about it, misrepresent him quite seriously. According to the book, Hoffman met Erdos only once; and his portrayal of him in the book is simultaneously oversimplified, confused and inaccurate. I am giving the book two stars rather than one, because at least it is better and more accurate than the blurb about it.
Erdos is portrayed as narrowly obsessed with mathematics, to the point of almost being a freak. He is described in the blurb as having none of the normal interests in sex, companionship, art or even food. While I don't usually describe the personal characterstics of my friends and acquaintances in a public review, Erdos has for some reason become so much of a topic for public discussion that I feel that I should respond to some of the wilder remarks. It is true that Erdos was celibate, but he had a very great liking for companionship, and friendships were important to him..
He disliked being alone, and mostly managed to avoid being alone. He had a very large number of friends, to whom he was very warm and caring and extremely generous. Yes, he could be a tiring guest, but he gave far more than he ever took, and far more than most people ever do. He gave absolutely unstintingly of his time, mathematical ideas, money (whenever he had any) and influence (whenever he had any). He always made very special efforts not only to visit and help his friends when ill or in difficulties, but to do the same with the friends and relations of his friends. Not all his friends were mathematicians. Notably, he was extremely fond of children. He carried out his desire for companionship into his professional life, where he carried out a great deal of his work in collaboration with others, and had more collaborators than any other scientist of whom I have ever heard. As regards food, he had a great appreciation of good food, and would for example, sometimes reciprocate his hosts by taking them to good restaurants. While he did not have a special interest in art, he was very fond of nature, and also had strong interests in languages, history and politics. He was certainly not a "Man Who Loved Only Numbers". He was indeed obsessed with mathematics; but this was his least unusual characteristic. Many people pursue interests and careers obsessively; Erdos differed from others in being infinitely more creative and successful in his chosen pursuit than most others; in the extent to which he combined this obsession with an intelligent interest in other subjects; and in pursuing creative mathematics into old age.
The book and the blurb about it, also make me uneasy in my professional capacity as a developmental and cognitive psychologist who studies individual differences in cognition. While few people are as outstandingly talented in any direction as Erdos in mathematics, many people - a far larger number than had at one time been thought - are uneven in their abilities. It is both scientifically inaccurate, and a potential source of distress to the individuals concerned, to assume that such unevennesses are solely a matter of attention and focus. Thus, the implication that Erdos' physical clumsiness and difficulties with certain practical activities were due solely to a narrow focus on mathematics is both unfair to Erdos personally and a disservice to the many less eminent people who are physically clumsy or have other specific cognitive or motor difficulties.
If anyone is interested in reading a good biography of Erdos, I would strongly recommend them to read Schecter's "My Brain Is Open" - much better than this ... book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Very Good Book About A Charming, Eccentric Genius, Dec 29 2003
Paul Hoffman, publisher of Encyclopedia Brittanica, has written a lively biography of Paul Erdos, a brilliant number theorist who spent his long and productive career with no permanent residence. Although Erdos had many oddities, such as the inability to handle some of the most mundane tasks such as taking a shower without pointing the nozzle in the wrong direction and getting water all over the floor, he was a very charming and lovable man, unlike, for example, John Nash throughout much of the latter's life.
I think that a more accurate title would have been The Man Who Understood Only Numbers. Certainly he loved children and had no apparent malice towards anyone. I recommend this book to anyone with an interest in people of unusual intelligence. This is not a math book. No knowledge of mathematics whatsoever is necessary for the enjoyment of this book and the appreciation of its subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
A True Genius Walked amongst us.., Nov 14 2003
I did not intend to suggest I knew Erdos,I was just thinking that every once in a while a genius does appear and walks amongst we less gifted mortals.Although I've studied a lot of mathematics;but when one reads about Erdos,one feels like a baseball fan,who has not even played minor league ball,getting to see how a Major Leaguer ,and one of the best at that,thinks.
If you would like to read about a man whose life in Mathematics was similar to Woody Guthrie's in music you will find this an excellent read.To enjoy this book you no more need to know mathematics any more than you need to read or compose music to enjoy reading about the life of Guthrie.
Erdos,who put in 19-hour days proving and conjecturing,denied that he fell asleep during mathematics conferences."I wasn't sleeping",he would say."I was thinking."
The book also tells us about Erdos's great friend,Ron Graham.They were referred to as the odd couple of mathematics; but so different from one another.Erdos never had a job that lasted more than an acedemic year;Graham would stay at Bell Labs his whole career,eventually becoming Chief Scientist.Graham had a complete family life ;Erdos had no family.Erdos became addicted to amphetamines.Graham bet him he couldn't quit.Erdos won and kept off drugs for a month and said "But I didn't get any work done.I'd get up in the morning and stare at a blank piece of paper.I'd have no ideas,just like an ordinary person.You set mathematics back a month".
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No