Ask a logophile or crossword-puzzle addict what the holiest of holy reference works might be, and you're almost certain to receive a three-letter acronym in reply: the OED. Now in 20 volumes and still growing, the Oxford English Dictionary is an astounding monument, one that, like the Great Wall and the Roman Forum, seems to have been around forever. But, writes the always interesting explorer Simon Winchester in The Meaning of Everything, it took decades--and considerable sums of money--to bring it into being. The Scottish autodidact James Augustus Henry Murray, surrounded by a small army of underpaid and overworked helpers, laboured over it for more than half a century, seeing into print "a total of 227,779,589 letters and numbers, occupying fully 178 miles of type" that brought the elusive histories of words such as walrus (courtesy of J. R. R. Tolkien) and cow ("the female of any bovine animal," courtesy of Murray himself) into sharp relief. The making of the great dictionary over the years and decades seems an unlikely topic for a sometimes romantic, sometimes suspenseful tale, but Winchester delivers just that. Those who cherish words will find it a constant pleasure. --Gregory McNamee --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
With his usual winning blend of scholarship and accessible, skillfully paced narrative, Winchester (Krakatoa) returns to the subject of his first bestseller, The Professor and the Madman, to tell the eventful, personality-filled history of the definitive English dictionary. He emphasizes that the OED project began in 1857 as an attempt to correct the deficiencies of existing dictionaries, such as Dr. Samuel Johnson's. Winchester opens with an entertaining and informative examination of the development of the English language and pre-OED efforts. The originators of the OED thought the project would take perhaps a decade; it actually took 71 years, and Winchester explores why. An early editor, Frederick Furnivall, was completely disorganized (one sack of paperwork he shipped to his successor, James Murray, contained a family of mice). Murray in turn faced obstacles from Oxford University Press, which initially wanted to cut costs at the expense of quality. Winchester stresses the immensity and difficulties of the project, which required hundreds of volunteer readers and assistants (including J.R.R. Tolkien) to create and organize millions of documents: the word bondmaid was left out of the first edition because its paperwork was lost. Winchester successfully brings readers inside the day-to-day operations of the massive project and shows us the unrelenting passion of people such as Murray and his overworked, underpaid staff who, in the end, succeeded magnificently. Winchester's book will be required reading for word mavens and anyone interested in the history of our marvelous, ever-changing language.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Until I read this book I really had no idea that the OED was, in large measure, created by the contributions of an army of unpaid amateurs. Read morePublished on Oct. 22 2010 by C. J. Thompson
This is an interesting story well-told, but I find myself in agreement with those readers who feel that it was somewhat hastily thrown together. Read morePublished on July 16 2004 by AFlockwood
Simon Winchester's book chronicles the efforts of many individuals who, as he often repeats, never received compensation and only limited recognition. Read morePublished on June 19 2004 by Bill y
Immediately after I finished undergraduate school, some thirty years ago, I joined a book club, finally free to read for pleasure once again. Read morePublished on June 3 2004 by Matthew Spady
The greatest virtue, it seems to me, of this account of the glacial development of what can only be called the greatest reference work in the English language is its concision. Read morePublished on May 11 2004 by Daniel Myers
OED involves -involved and it will involve- a double, towering feat in the history of scholarship. One, for certain, as a majestic monument to a gloriously rich language. Read morePublished on April 7 2004 by Fernando Villegas
I could not bring myself to put this book down--it was too fascinating in too many ways. Other reviewers have amply and most revealingly described it; I will content myself with... Read morePublished on March 8 2004 by "scribble136"
A delightful bit of business, mainly because of Winchester's taste for the bizarre. The actual history is liberally salted with mostly unrelated anecdotes (such as the fact that... Read morePublished on March 6 2004 by Lynn S. Hendricks
I wouldn't exactly say this book is gripping or enthralling. Winchester writes with a kind of distant, haughty prose which comes across as rather ... Victorian. Read morePublished on Feb. 6 2004 by Ken Zirkel