1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Stupid and Corny, April 13 2002
By A Customer
Rose, the protagonist of "The Patron Saint of Liars" seems to have an answer for all of life's problems and it always seems to be the same...running away. Rose seems to think that out of sight is definitely out of mind.
When we meet Rose, she is a very confused, Catholic woman who realizes after some years of marriage (and despite the fact that she's pregnant), that she simply doesn't love her husband anymore. Perhaps she never did. Rather than getting help from her local priest or even a marriage counselor and, even short of confiding in her husband (about her lack of love for him or her pregnancy), Rose does what Rose does best...she simply leaves.
With no destination in mind and no money (Rose's preferred method of travel), Rose ends up in a home for unwed mothers in Kentucky. She lies to the nuns about her family and eventually meets Son, the handsome, charismatic handyman at the home. All the pregnant girls are in love with Son, but of course, it is Rose who ends up snaring him...and marrying him. The fact that Rose already has a husband is simply glossed over. This is a woman who doesn't want to be bothered with details.
Fifteen years later, Son is a good father to Cecilia, the daughter that isn't really his...at least in a biological sense. Whether Rose is a good (second) wife and mother, is a more subjection question.
Rose and Son have inherited the mansion belonging to the founder of the home and while both Son and Cecilia are happy to live there, Rose chooses instead to live in Son's small cabin. It seems, for reasons not made completely clear, that this woman simply can't bear life in a mansion with her gorgeous husband and daughter. Strange? Maybe for you and I, but definitely not for our Rose. She seems to feel a compulsion to do everything more than just a bit off-key.
Complications arise when Rose receives a letter from her first, and real, husband. It won't take a very astute reader to guess what Rose does next and it gives nothing of the plot away to say that yes, she does. She leaves.
This is a very forgiving book, however, and it ends on a very cliched note...with a miracle. A hot spring that had been dormant since the 1930s begins to bubble and flow. And all due to Rose, no doubt!
To say that this book has unlikable characters is putting it mildly. Rose is the most selfish and self-centered character I've encountered in a long time, in fiction or in real life. Her propensity for running away was as tiresome as a child's temper tantrum and when she finally did decide to face something she, herself, had created, her motivation for doing so was vague and cliched. She's the type of woman anyone with any sense would just love to slap across the face while telling her to grow up and count her blessings!
Son was just as bad. He was a nice person, but he may have been a little "too nice." The fact that he took all of Rose's stupid antics without much complaint at all was beyond belief and made me actively dislike him. Cecilia was a brat, but here, at least, we could understand why.
There really wasn't much substance to this book. I can't for the life of me understand why it was even published, let alone made into a television play. I've seen the television play and for those of you who are wondering, no, the book isn't more fleshed-out. It's every bit as bad.
There are more good books in this world than any one of us will ever be able to read. This isn't one of them. Do yourself a favor and skip it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
An Almost Wonderful Book, Jan 13 2002
First, Patchett can write very well--she carries you right along on a beautiful stream of words--so she is a joy to read no matter what else you might say about her. What I would say however is that while this is a really good book, she gets better in later books. It is probably not fair to judge this book by what she accomplishes later--but ah, we are human - and so we do unfair things. Just like Patchett's characters. I like her characters...not personally but as literary devices. They are complex. They are not presented in neat little packages so that we, the readers, are given a complete overview of who they are and why they do what they do. They are often contradictory and we have to keep asking why are they doing this -or that. I think we look for characters that are easy to understand because we are so desperate to try and make sense out of the world-and we are hoping that literature will help us do that. But I think good literature helps us see how complicated it really is and that there are no simple answers about why people do what they do. So Patchett gives us characters that make us crazy based on the decisions they are making-but who are good people, regardless of their decisions. We realize in the process that people do not have to do specific things to be good people-and that we don't really know -and don't have to know why a person makes the decisions they do- you can still care about them. Why, for instance, would a married woman, with a husband who adores her abandon him and go to a home for unwed mothers. Why would a woman who adores her mother decide to never communicate with her mother again? You read along saying to yourself-no! Don't do that. But she does it and, she is still a good person-a deeply good person-with a scar that is never explained to us but that drives her and diverts her-and we don't have to know and we have no right to judge. I guess my very favorite thing about Patchett is not that her characters are complex, contradictory and allusive but it is in the relationships Patchett builds between her characters--they are not relationships we recognize. Love between men and women may or may not be romantic. The love of a mother for a child does not have to fit into a cookie-cutter--all good or all bad. Loyalty maybe demonstrated by non-action as well as action. We may choose to move on-or stay-in any relationship or place but it won't change who we are. I think Patchett is masterful--here and in her other books--at creating these 'non-standard' relationships--and in the process broadening our thinking about what it means to be human. And while I like her later books better than this one--and I imagine it isn't fair to judge this book by her later work--I am still doing it...so this one gets four stars -- primarily because her others deserve five.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No