15 of 21 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
good book, Jun 26 2001
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Piri Reis Map of 1513 (Hardcover)
If you are interested in maps and the history of the discovery of the americas this book can be recommended. It is sometimes difficult to read. The pages with the maps are not always in the same place where the maps are discussed, which is quite inconvienent. I learnt a lot about the early maps of america and the authors presented their ideas convincingly. The authors should have spent less pages on debunking obvouisly outlandish ideas. All in all I enjoyed the book and the detailed maps in it.
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Quite disappointed by this book, Nov 1 2005
By J. W. S. BUUREN "Hans van Buuren" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Piri Reis Map of 1513 (Hardcover)
When I bought this book I wanted to find out what the truth is as far as the Antarctic area on the Piri Reis map is concerned. The fact this book was written by a cartographer could shed some light on the issue. Reading the book I became very disappointed by it. The writer knows his maps, that is for sure. He describes the map and the errors found in it in great deal and you can learn a lot of that. But the writer also seems biased on the Antarctic subject. His pictures seem to prove the opposite be he still claims the Antarctic region on the Piri Reis map only coincidentally resembles the real thing.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good analysis, better than Hapgood, July 17 2010
By Chris M. "Chris M." - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Piri Reis Map of 1513 (Hardcover)
After reading Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings: Evidence of Advanced Civilization in the Ice Age, I thought this book might clear up some issues and provide some analysis of previous studies done on this map. I feel that this book did a good job in this area. McIntosh goes to town on the sloppy methods used by others over the years and conducts a more unbiased study without putting forth wild theories or making the data fit any preconceived notions. His discussion about Piri Reis' use of a map made by Columbus is worth the read.
Here are a few quotes that I found apt in terms of criticizing earlier studies done. "It appears the method of Kahle, Levillier, Mallery, Hapgood, and others was to ignore the place-names inscribed on the landforms on the Piri Reis map, compare its features with a modern map to 'identify' the features, and then contrast the 'amazing accuracy' of the manuscript Piri Reis map with early printed maps." (pg. 41) Also on this page he notes that Hapgood only really looked at printed maps, which were "more inaccurate for their time", and that "the Piri Reis map is no more accurate than other manuscript maps of its time". McIntosh goes further in stating that "selective use of data can be used to support almost any untenable position". (pg. 68)