2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Nothing but pipe dreams and propaganda, Feb 10 2002
This review is from: The Probability Broach (Paperback)
It was so bad I couldn't finish it. It falls more in the category of fantasy rather than sci-fi in that you're asked to accept the situation at face value without any explaination of its mechanics; I couldn't figure out why the NAC was able to thrive with its philosophy of minimal-to-nonexistent official intervention, and the book doesn't seem to want to reveal the reasons. Why no price gouging if Adam Smith's economic theory reigns supreme instead of John Maynard Keynes'? Why no murder sprees killers could claim were justifiable homicides if everyone's required to pack heat? Why no airplanes in a tech base that produced flatscreen TV two decades before ours? Why won't a policy of requiring unanimous decisions on major issues result in a pattern of implicit dictatorship by one joker consistently voting against the grain and preventing the passage or revocation of a bill? Did Shay's Rebellion, which showed the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation, even occur in this universe? Why aren't drugs addictive? And if drugs are still addictive, why hasn't some Omar Santiago wannabe used that scientific quirk to create a personal army and carve off a swatch of the NAC for himself?
The heavy politicization was also a turn-off--what's the point of making 1776 Anno Domini/Common Era into 1 Anno Liberatis ("year of freedom")?--as was the idea that the rule of law is what creates heinous acts, like airport metal detectors convincing terrorists to blow up airliners rather than hijack them. The Copyright Office in Win's universe has an armed tactical unit? I'd love to see what kind of heavily-armed death squads Smith gave the Departments of Agriculture and Education.
Having a Lexington minuteman ancestor and middle school classmates who were descended from John Adams and Benjamin Franklin also made this book rather heretical in my opinion. I do not consider the Founding Fathers to have been evil masterminds bent on unfairly forcing Josiah Saltpork to [loud shocked gasp] kick back some of his livelihood to help pay for road repairs, as much as the Newington, New Hampshire secessionists would beg to differ.
Basically, I think this book is merely an example of how the Libertarian Party is little more than a bunch of petulant whiners with an overinflated sense of entitlement. If you want better political analysis in sci-fi, try Frank Herbert's "Dune" saga; for a better alternate history detective mystery, try Harry Turtledove's "The Two Georges," as it also features right-wing loonies who think George Washington was scum and use unexplained, badly-written alternate history to promote their views.
And yes, I have picked up and used a firearm before.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
What an utter load of crap., Nov 7 2000
Gun toting children, talking gorillas, steam-powered (?) aircars and mile-long zeppelins: You'll find all of these while reading this book. Now it's OK if this was, say, a Douglas Adams book, but smith takes his ludicrous alternate history seriously. In Smith's opinion, if we only switched to an anarchist form of government, every human ailment would disappear instantaniously, along with some annoying laws of nature such as the conservation of energy, or the fact that animals can't think like humans. As to the characters... every character was ripped right out of a Heinlein book, and the bad guys are simply pathetic. I'd call it a "mustn't read". I'm sorry I ever did - although I got some cheap laughs out of it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
Portrait of the Libertarian Ideal, Nov 23 2003
This review is from: The Probability Broach (Paperback)
Oh, the story is silly and the writing is just OK, but the portrait painted of the Libertarian ideal is pretty well done. One can read this book and almost imagine living in a world where there are *really* no laws, except for those that *individuals* collectively enforce.
Actual Libertarians tend towards two camps: Limited Government and No Government. Smith is in the latter camp.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No