The Queen of Last Hopes: The Story of Margaret of Anjou Paperback – Jan 11 2011
|New from||Used from|
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
One of Higginbotham's strengths is taking the reader into this world and letting them feel what day to day life was like. This book is recommended for readers of historical fiction. It really filled in a gap in my knowledge of this period, and may do so for many other readers. The reader will enjoy Higganbotham's research and ability to bring an era and its characters to life. (Booksie's Blog 2011-01-14)
Susan Higginbotham writes a good book. Research, honesty and genuine historical accuracy the hallmarks of her work show through in Queen of Last Hopes as they did in The Stolen Crown. Her books can be trusted, and this isn't something that can be said about a good many authors of historical fiction. (A Nevill Feast 2011-01-14)
This story was absolutely wonderful with vivid scenes that pop before your eyes. The characters shower you with feelings so raw that you can't help but feel as they do. This is a story that is very difficult to put down. (Yankee Romance Reviewers 2011-01-14)
The Queen of Last Hopes is a winner and will please Higginbotham's fans and attract new readers from the adherents of the Lancastrian faction. (Historical Novel Review 2011-01-14)
Of all 4 of Susan Higginbotham's historical novels, this is my favorite. Add this one to your wishlists and TBR pilesit's a good one! (Historical-Fiction.com 2011-01-14)
Kudos to Susan for taking on a character so reviled by history and shedding new light on her actions...All in all this is a good book. (At Home with a Good Book and the Cat 2011-01-14)
I could not put it down; I was so entertained by Higginbotham's telling of Margaret's story which is why I endowed the five star rating.. Readers will become immersed in the quest for the rightful owner of the crown of England, as history's mysteries also seep through to help add to the titillation of the reader. (The Burton Review 2011-01-14)
The book is hard to put down once started. Each chapter is written in the voice of an important figure of the time so it is not one sided at all. Ms. Higgenbotham takes some liberties with history for the sake of her novel but she explains them clearly in the notes at the end. It is after all a NOVEL and entertainment is part of the package. And I was entertained as well as educated. What more could one ask from a historical novel? (The Broken Teepee 2011-01-14)
Last year I finally read my first Susan Higginbotham novel, The Stolen Crown and was hooked. I was anxiously awaiting her latest novel, The Queen of Last Hopes and was lucky enough to receive a review copy. I was not disappointed. 4.5/5 stars (So Many Precious Books, So Little Time 2011-01-14)
This is a brilliant piece of historical fiction and is highly recommended (Readin and Dreamin 2011-01-14)
Susan Higginbotham's books are a historical fiction lover's gold mine...As a reader I caught myself wishing that history would re-write itself and give Margaret and Henry a happy ending, but it wasn't to be. But if a book can make you feel that way, it's really saying something about the author and the writing of the book. I'm giving this one 4 out of 5 apples from my book bag! (Debbie's Book Bag 2011-01-14)
Susan Higginbotham is a wonderful story teller and The Queen of Last Hopes is a must read for all those who love a great historical novel. I give The Queen of Last Hopes 5 out of 5 stars.
(Michelle's Book Blog 2011-01-14)
I thoroughly enjoyed this novel and I was incredibly sad when I came to the end which is the sign of a story well told. (Scandalous Women 2011-01-14)
In The Queen of Last Hopes Higginbotham successfully gives a voice to one of the most maligned women in history and in usual fashion, with spot-on historical accuracy and skillful writing, it's one you won't want to miss!
(Passages to the Past 2011-01-14)
This book is next to impossible to put down once you start it. (Book Drunkard 2011-01-28)
Ms. Higginbotham does a masterful job of presenting characters that are likeable (or in some cases, detestable) within realistic boundaries. (Ever Expanding Library 2011-01-21)
I really enjoyed the book and it was great to read from Lancastrian point of view for change.
(Elina Blomqvist BookRamblings.net 2011-02-03)
It is written by the wonderful Susan Higginbotham, I knew it couldn't be anything but good and I was right.
(The Lady Gwyn's Kingdom 2011-02-08)
This was a book I found difficult to put down and a wonderful addition to any book shelf.
(A Moment with Mystee 2011-02-08)
I enjoyed this book and recommend it for anyone interested in the period of English history and Margaret of Anjou in particular.
(CelticLady's Review 2011-02-08)
Higginbotham effectively turned a character with negative stereotyping into a character that I could care about and connect with.
(The Maiden's Court 2011-02-08)
Susan Higginbotham weaves an intricate tale of love and betrayal in the captivating backdrop of 15th century England. The Queen of Last Hopes very effectively personalizes a family feud as famous as Campbell and MacDonald and Hatfield and McCoy.
(Luxury Reading 2011-02-08)
Overall, The Queen of Last Hopes was an engaging historical novel for me that suited my expectations perfectly. (Medieval Bookworm 2011-01-21)
To say it was fabulous is an understatement. Ms. Higginbotham did an excellent job on her research, and truly did the real-life characters a service in portraying their stories.
(History Undressed 2011-01-17)
I don't cry often at stories but this had me fighting back tears over the last several chapters. I would certainly read more by this author. If you enjoy historical fiction you should love this book.
(Martha's Bookshelf 2011-01-18)
I highly recommend The Queen of Last Hopes to every reader who enjoys historical fiction and to those who have not yet tried a historical fiction book, this is the one to read.
I love it when an author takes a historical character and brings them to life in a way that is fresh and new. That is exactly what Susan Higginbotham did with Margaret of Anjou. (Queen of Happy Endings 2011-01-17)
Wow, just wow this book completely blew me away. I was mesmerized from the begging and found putting it down was very hard. (Sara is Reading What? 2011-01-13)
About the Author
Susan Higginbotham is the author of five historical novels, including The Stolen Crown, The Queen of Last Hopes, and Hugh and Bess. The Traitor's Wife, her first novel, is the winner of ForeWord Magazine's 2005 Silver Award for historical fiction and is a Gold Medalist, Historical/Military Fiction, 2008 Independent Publisher Book Awards. She writes her own historical fiction blog and is a contributor to the blog Yesterday Revisited. Higginbotham has worked as an editor andan attorney, and lives in North Carolina with her family.See all Product Description
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
Source: ARC from Publisher
Category: Historical Fiction
Margaret of Anjou was betrothed to Henry VI at the age of fourteen, a match that was suppose to bring stability and peace between the much rivalled England and France. Her husband-to-be, Henry was throned as an infant, and very different from his father. While his father was a military hero, Henry VI yearned for peace., he believed that Margaret would bring him what he wanted. A young Margaret was sent off alone, and had to endure a long, arduous boat trip, a trip that left her indisposed and consoled by strangers. To make matters worst, her parents left her a measly, embarrassing dowry. Margaret was scared, and unsure of her outcome. When Margaret finally reaches England, she is relieved to meet her patient, loving, and kind husband. Her dowry is forgotten, the King showers her with gifts and life is looking bright. Shortly after her coronation Queen Margaret's family have their own ultimatums, and Margaret must deliver. Her future is threatened, Margaret is pulled between the love of her husband, and the loyalty to her family. When she has issues producing an heir, the people of England remain cold, the longer she advances without becoming pregnant, the people become more hostile and suspicious. Margaret begins to lose hope, Henry stands patient and comforting. King Henry, thought to be a weak King, trusting too easily and questioning very little. His family seems to all have their own interests at stake, and see a thorn that may soon become vacant. When Margaret bores a son, she is elated but her happiness is soon splintered when she finds out her husband is not lucid.Read more ›
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
There are a few chapters sprinkled throughout the story that are narrated by other characters on the Lancaster side. It is essential in this story because the narration is first person you can only see what that character saw; Margaret wasn't actually at many of the places where the action on for the Lancaster's happened. These other narrators were well developed as characters in the story before they were a narrator so it wasn't jarring to have them telling the story. There was only one major issue I had with these alternate narrators and this was when someone would narrate their own death scene - or still talk to us after they were dead (this shouldn't be a spoiler as you should expect a lot of deaths in the Wars of the Roses). It would just really aggravate me because it didn't fit with the rest of the novel whereas the narrators are alive and well and telling what is going on around them. This sort of thing happened a couple of times.
I was most impressed with the extensive character listing in the book. With so many characters in the Wars of the Roses, it is tough to keep track of who is who, especially when their titles changed all of the time. The listing had little descriptions of who that person was and it was organized by families - so it was much easier to keep your mind straight. I referred back to this time and again. I will probably also use it when I read other WOTR books.
Overall, I really enjoyed this book. Now that I have read one book from each side of this War, I have a better sense of what they were fighting for. Higginbotham effectively turned a character with negative stereotyping into a character that I could care about and connect with.
This book was received from the publisher in exchange for a review and this was also posted on my blog.
The War of the Roses, ok I will do my best. Margaret of Anjou was married to Henry VI from the house of Lancaster. Together they had a son Edward. Henry was mad, other people wanted power because they all descended from the same king. Warwick, the king-maker plotted with the Duke of York, and what follows is battles, the king being captured, Margaret plotting for her husband and son, more battles, people turning sides etc etc. King Edward IV. Exile, plotting, and then I will not even go into the whole plotting inside the York camp and when they kill each other.
This was my second Higginbotham book and I do enjoy her books. They are so rich in history, and so full of detail. Sure I was lost now and again. How could I not be, all these people plotting were cousins, so cousin killing cousin, cousin marrying cousin, brother killing brother. Always switching sides, but all the major players are listed in the book so it felt good to go and have a look at that. The War of the Roses will always be one big mess, but Higginbotham makes a good job explaining it all.
I have read other books, yes more Yorkist books, so I never thought much about Margaret. But she was so young, and her husband went mad so early. The people hated her and said that her son was not the kings. I felt really sorry for her because her whole world just crumbled under her. I also saw her with new eyes, because those who win write the history and she has not been looked upon with gentle eyes. But then the women are always the weak spot and get all the blame.
I even turned into a Lancastrian, they had the right to rule. Still a mad king is not a good king, so I am a bit of a Yorkist there. But as usual, Warwick is an evil man, and I just have to like Edward IV. I also have to mention Henry Beaufort, the Duke of Somerset, I even had a bit of a crush on him, and I did like that Higginbotham took some creative freedom and played a bit with him.
A great book, you are there, you are on the side of the House of Lancaster and look at things from their point of view. Margaret is the main character, but instead of letting her tell it all, there are some other POVs, Somerset among others. And I did like that, because then you really were on all those battle fields.
Recommendation and final thoughts:
I do recommend her books to all historical fiction fans, and the rest of you too. They are just so good, and I just become more and more interested in The War of the Roses. A messy period in time turns into one great story.
Reason for reading:
I really enjoyed her last book, The Stolen Crown (Go York ;)
Susan Higgenbotham has done a marvelous job of researching Margaret and the War of the Roses to present the often confusing York/Lancaster battles for the crown in this well written new book. I have to admit to a certain confusion over all the back and forth in this time period; it is not a favorite of mine but it does ultimately lead up to those Tudors. In The Queen of Last Hopes Ms. Higgenbotham presents Margaret not as a woman fighting just for the sake of fighting but rather as a mother fighting for the rights of her son. Her son's claim to that throne was as strong (in her eyes) as the Yorkist claim and she was going to do whatever she could to fight for him and for her country.
The book is hard to put down once started. Each chapter is written in the voice of an important figure of the time so it is not one sided at all. While it IS Margaret's story other voices do get heard. Ms. Higgenbotham takes some liberties with history for the sake of her novel but she explains them clearly in the notes at the end. It is after all a NOVEL and entertainment is part of the package. And I was entertained as well as educated. What more could one ask from a historical novel?
History is written by the victors and often propaganda is passed as fact. Presenting another side of a story backed by detailed research can open your eyes to rethinking rumors of great historical women.
Some of these other segments do, however, have one disturbing attribute - they are written by dead people! For instance, Chapter 7, written by William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk, ends (p. 63):
"Let these ruffians play their games with their mock trial and rusty sword; they might have bested me, but I had met defeat from a far more formidable foe: at the hands of the most gallant general France had ever known. And I had put up a good fight; she said so her very self. It was something of comfort to take to my grave with me. I smiled, and I was still smiling when the rat-catcher Lenard raised his sword."
So, what ... after they chopped off his head with the sword he sat down to finish writing his tale? It would have been much better to have had this chapter written by an observer. Yes, I know, it's only a novel - but novels in the form of documents or letters written by different people should be plausible (Dracula, The Woman in White and Les Liaisons Dangereuses are good examples of how this can be done).
There's another one on p. 251:
"I clapped him on the shoulder as Montagu's men, followed by a priest, came to lead us to the block. I smiled at Fish and the rest of my men, then at the Yorkists as they hustled us out of our cell. "And our cause isn't dead; it won't be as long as one of us somewhere has breath left in his body. It's only resting.""
So they came to take him to the block - then allowed him to sit down and finish his first-person account of his imminent execution? This happens again on p. 298, in a first person account by Margaret's son Edward, which ends:
"He lifted his dagger, and even as I struggled, I knew that there would be no St. Crispin's Day for me, no words of love from Anne, no standing before my father and telling him that I had won his crown back for him. Only death in a muddy field and the breaking of my mother's heart that she had feared all along."
Was this scene meant to have been posthumously dictated by Edward's ghost, after he was stabbed to death? There's a scene about the murder of Henry VI that is indubitably written by his ghost, after he is smothered with a pillow (p. 310):
"He turned away, having made the common mistake of thinking that the dead cannot hear, and that God is not watching all. If I could have spoken, I would have told him that."
Weird. But aside from this, the only other flaw I can see is the decision to have Margaret of Anjou have an affair with Henry Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, while she is in exile in France in 1462. The author concedes in the Author's Note that this is a "great historical liberty". I prefer historical novelists not to take any great liberties with people who really existed. But it is only a novel.
Three stars seems fair. But if it hadn't been for the bizarre scenes written by dead people, I would have given it four.