CDN$ 44.08
  • List Price: CDN$ 47.17
  • You Save: CDN$ 3.09 (7%)
Usually ships within 3 to 5 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Add to Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Routledge Creative Writing Coursebook Paperback – Feb 10 2006


Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 44.08
CDN$ 32.05 CDN$ 14.99

Join Amazon Student in Canada


NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Paperback: 256 pages
  • Publisher: Routledge; 1 edition (Feb. 10 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0415317851
  • ISBN-13: 978-0415317856
  • Product Dimensions: 23 x 20 x 2 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 440 g
  • Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #1,745,479 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

2.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Aaron on April 29 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Paul Mill's effort is the first creative-writing text that I've read - and if others in the field are comparable, it may be the last. Some of the adjectives it conjures up - though I've been warned to use adjectives sparingly, without being told why - are dissatisfying, muddled, and inadequate. Part of the fault lies, no doubt, in the overambitious nature of these one-stop-shopping works, but only part. There are other reasons for concern.

The book is replete with a lot of very poor philosophising. The philosophising itself is unavoidable, I suppose, but it needn't be sub-par. Here it houses self-referential missteps and nested inconsistencies. At one point, within the space of a paragraph, the author seems to espouse both mind-body dualism and physicalism. His treatment of memory is also shallow and ill-conceived.

Yet maybe we can forgive him the philosophical blunders. After all, he's a simple writer and not a philosopher. However, he also falters where we would expect him to be strong - on language. For instance, in discussing metaphor his prime example is not a metaphor at all but an analogy. ("Doesn't he know the difference?" I thought.) Worst of all, in my view, was his off-the-mark chapter on children's fiction. It lacked all insight and penetration.

It could possibly have been worse, so I gave the thing two stars. But, needless to say, I do not recommend it.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Product Images from Customers

Search


Feedback