Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Silence of the Lambs: Special Edition (Widescreen)
 
See larger image
 

The Silence of the Lambs: Special Edition (Widescreen)

Jodie Foster , Anthony Hopkins , Jonathan Demme    R (Restricted)   DVD
4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (230 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.




Product Details


Product Description

Amazon.com Essential Video

Based on Thomas Harris's novel, this terrifying film by Jonathan Demme really only contains a couple of genuinely shocking moments (one involving an autopsy, the other a prison break). The rest of the film is a splatter-free visual and psychological descent into the hell of madness, redeemed astonishingly by an unlikely connection between a monster and a haunted young woman. Anthony Hopkins is extraordinary as the cannibalistic psychiatrist Dr. Hannibal Lecter, virtually entombed in a subterranean prison for the criminally insane. At the behest of the FBI, agent-in-training Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) approaches Lecter, requesting his insights into the identity and methods of a serial killer named Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine). In exchange, Lecter demands the right to penetrate Starling's most painful memories, creating a bizarre but palpable intimacy that liberates them both under separate but equally horrific circumstances. Demme, a filmmaker with a uniquely populist vision (Melvin and Howard, Something Wild), also spent his early years making pulp for Roger Corman (Caged Heat), and he hasn't forgotten the significance of tone, atmosphere, and the unsettling nature of a crudely effective close-up. Much of the film, in fact, consists of actors staring straight into the camera (usually from Clarice's point of view), making every bridge between one set of eyes to another seem terribly dangerous. --Tom Keogh

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


 

Customer Reviews

230 Reviews
5 star:
 (181)
4 star:
 (23)
3 star:
 (9)
2 star:
 (4)
1 star:
 (13)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.5 out of 5 stars (230 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars One of the best thrillers ever made, Mar 21 2012
By 
Steven Aldersley (Oshawa, Ontario, Canada) - See all my reviews
(TOP 50 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
It's rare for a film to win Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Picture, Best Director and Best Screenplay Oscars, but The Silence of the Lambs did just that. Hannibal Lecter (Hopkins) is often regarded at the top villain in cinema history and he's probably the first character that springs to mind when you think about the movie. It's hard to believe that Hopkins was only on the screen for about 16 minutes.

The story begins with Agent Clarice Starling (Foster). We see her tackling an obstacle course at the FBI's Quantico training center. Her boss, Jack Crawford, (Glenn), calls her in and asks her to visit Lecter. He's in a secure cell and the warnings she receives appear excessive, but they seem justified by the end of the movie.

Lecter is intelligent, polite and eloquent. Although he's a monster capable of eating people, he has a twisted sense of honor. It's clear that he likes Starling and he rewards some of her honest revelations with help and insight into how she might track down serial killer, Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine).

It's curious that the movie is often placed in the horror genre. I watched David Fincher's version of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo recently, and compared the two films. Both are essentially investigations into murders as the protagonists attempt to track a serial killer. Each includes a colorful character, although one is a hero and the other a villain. If Lisbeth Salander and Hannibal Lecter were more conventional characters, the two movies would lose a lot of their power. I think it's wrong to label The Silence of the Lambs as a horror movie, but I understand why that's often the case.

The movie works because we love how monstrous Lecter is and how human Starling can be. Foster's performance made Starling seem incredibly vulnerable. She's a young cadet finding her way in the FBI and this is her first big break. Then we see that she has to contend with Lecter, who is ruthlessly insightful and able to read her easily. Much of the story is seen from Starling's point of view and it's easy to identify with her fears as she tries to catch the killer.

The final showdown is extremely effective. You can sense the evil in Buffalo Bill and Starling's fear is audible and visible. The song playing during this sequence (Hip Priest, by The Fall) holds special meaning for me as it was played at the first concert I ever attended.

Scott Glenn can be very likable and I enjoyed his performance as Crawford. The movie drew considerable praise from the FBI for it's realism and it was easy to imagine Glenn as a member of the organization.

Hopkins is a versatile actor capable of playing just about any role. I would rank him among the top tier of my favorite actors. Maybe it's because of the characters he plays, but he strikes me as a very intelligent man.

The Silence of the Lambs is constructed simply, but the acting and the ominous mood elevate it to the level of greatness.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars pretty decent ,but Red Dragon is superior (3.5/5), Sep 14 2007
By 
falcon "disdressed12" (canada) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   
This review is from: Silence of the Lambs (DVD)
i remember watching this movie a long time ago and not being all that
impressed.but i watched it again last night,and i have a higher opinion
of it now than i did before.it's a good film,there's no question.it's
very moody and atmospheric,yet i still think Red Dragon is a superior
film.however,did like a lot about "Silence...".i thought Scott Glenn
was excellent as Jack Crawford,Starling's(Jodi Foster)superior.i am not
a Jodi Foster fan at all,however,she did well in this movie.i still
think, though,that Julianne Moore's portrayal of Clarice Starling in
Hannibal is superior.Hopkins is brilliant of course as Hannibal
Lector.but Ted Levine is equally brilliant in his portrayal of "Buffalo
Bill". yes,"Silence..."is a very good movie,but what puzzle me is how
people revere it as much as they do.it isn't that good.it will
definitely give you chills and draw you in.the story is very
compelling.having said all that,i give SOTL 3.5/5
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Poor casting hurts an otherwise good psychological drama, Oct 26 2003
By 
Randy Keehn (Williston, ND United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Silence of the Lambs (DVD)
I did not read the book so I don't know if the writer and director were trying to follow a flawed path with their script. However, the movie lost me early on with the premise that an FBI academy student would be chosen for an important assignment. Thus I found myself following the rest of the movie wondering what the heck Jodie Foster was doing in the center of all the action. Then there was the casting for Hannibal Lector. This character is going to have to convince the audience that he possesses not only a brilliant mind but also a powerful physique. Enter Anthony Hopkins and exit my interest in this character. By now I'm hoping that Scott Glenn will show up more often so I can have someone whose role I can accept.

There are several confusing sequences in the movie that detract further from its' quality. Maybe it's just me but I was totally confused by a scene with Jodie Foster and a group of local lawmen gathered when one of their own was found. Ms. Foster gave a little speech that made absolutely no sense to me. Then there was the incredible scene in which Hannibal Lector was transfered to Memphis or some such place at the request of some influencial politician (like that made any sense). We have a hotel with two divisions of policemen in it to guard Lector (and two cops actually doing the job). We are expected to accept that Lector is able to overpower the two cops, create a gruesome disguise and escape (presumeably by overpowering even more inept individuals). It was quite a series of events but I didn't buy the concept that it could have happened in the first place.

Well, enough of my complaints. My point is that I felt the movie lacked credibility. I think viewers were fascinated with the concept of Hannibal Lector and tended to accept whatever they were asked to. There was some interesting psychological dialogue and some scenes that were very well done. I just was never able to buy into it.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
 Go to Amazon.com to see all 535 reviews  4.5 out of 5 stars 
 
 
Most recent customer reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback