2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good spy story, April 9 2009
I read this book a few months ago and was surprised to find negative reviews here. It's a very good book; interesting characters, good plot, and a good spy story. Check out the reviews at the UK site of Amazon to get a more valid perspective on this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
The Coming Storm of World War II from a French Spy's Perspective, Aug 4 2008
Prior to World War II, most people either thought that Hitler and his generals were intent on world domination based on using any tool available or that these were reasonable people who could be persuaded to go elsewhere if you cut a deal with them. In between those views were the French, who thought that their Maginot Line could stop the Germans at the border in any future European war. Those who bet that Hitler and his generals were serious were right.
This book examines those perspectives from the vantage point of the Western spies operating in Warsaw in 1937 and 1938. The fictional Colonel Jean-Francois Mercier steals enough secrets to come to the right conclusion about what France faces. In the process, you learn a lot about spy tradecraft in that era and how the various countries oriented to one another.
The book has an oddly cold tone, as though this story was written in an attempt to keep out emotion, patriotism, and strong feelings of any kind. As a result, the plot, although interesting, failed to engage me into the story. I felt like I was reading a light, nonfiction magazine article about pre-World War II espionage instead.
For a reading public that likes to exalt the importance and impact of espionage, this story is a sort of anti-story . . . suggesting that perhaps espionage was then more a game than serious business.
To me, the best parts of the book were those that attempted to capture tradecraft in that era. Those were well done.
Unlike many spy stories where the ending is up in the air . . . due to an optional, fictitious result, The Spies of Warsaw ends up being a bit too predictable in leading up to the well-known events of 1939 and 1940.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Not his best. Maybe his worst., July 14 2008
I write historical novels and I know what it takes. I've read several of Furst's novels: the Polish Officer was superb; evocative of the times, lucid, detailed, understated. Dark Star was less effective. The Foreign Correspondent seemed to be somewhat scattered in focus. Now we come to The Spies of Warsaw, and what I detect here is a fine author desperately trying to satisfy the demands of his publisher and of his readers to keep the stories coming. I found the story line fractured, a bunch of bits and pieces focussed by the use of dates at the beginning of each section. The characters never came to life for me, the love story was a brief, superficial brush with suggestion, and the end of the book was a statement of history written as if the author was just plain tired of the whole effort. I did not enjoy The Spies of Warsaw. To give the author the respect he deserves I finished the book. It was boring.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No