The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up [Hardcover]

Adrian Henriques , Julie Richardson

List Price: CDN$ 156.30
Price: CDN$ 132.43 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: CDN$ 23.87 (15%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Usually ships within 3 to 5 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition CDN $37.58  
Hardcover CDN $132.43  
Paperback CDN $41.48  
Join Amazon Student in Canada

Book Description

Feb. 1 2004 1844070166 978-1844070169
The concept of the 'triple bottom line' (TBL) - the idea that business activity can simultaneously deliver financial, social and environmental benefits - was introduced in the early 1990s. A decade on, The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? brings together the world's leading experts on corporate responsibility to assess the implications, benefits and limitations of the TBL. This collection provides a review of what has already been achieved in stimulating change in corporate culture and bringing businesses to an appreciation of the importance and benefits of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and good environmental performance. It further explores the conceptual and practical limits of the metaphor of the TBL and sets out what can be achieved through regulation and legislation, presenting detailed professional procedures for environmental accounting and management and social auditing. The contributors' wealth of experience and insight provides a vivid picture of how much attention is now being focused by businesses on delivering more than just financial targets, and they clearly outline the necessary steps for successfully continuing along this trajectory.

Product Details

Product Description


'Airing of views from both sides of the debate, along with a mix of theory and practice, makes the book a good introduction to the area of TBL... there are some really deep and significant issues touched upon' SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING JOURNAL

About the Author

Adrian Henriques is Director of JustAssurance and Professor of Accountability and CSR at Middlesex University. Julie Richardson is a writer and consultant in the area of international environmental policy and CSR.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 4.0 out of 5 stars  2 reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars useful attempt to evaluate a visionary notion, if technocratic at times Aug. 13 2009
By Robert J. Crawford - Published on
The triple bottom line is supposed to integrate the concerns of all stakeholders into the balance sheet of business, adding a concern for society and the environment to those of profitmaking. These 3 domains are seen as increasingly inter-related: incorporating these "value concerns" in the business model, the reasoning goes, will also make you money. (E.g. recycling plastic waste is good for the environment and saves business a lot of money, which in many cases it does.) The concept was coined by John Elkington, a consultant and author, in 1996.

At the 10th anniversary of the idea, a group of British academics produced this book to assess the project. While the essays in the volume are uneven, there are a few gems that are very useful indeed.

Elkington's chapter sketches the vision: to create a world with a sustainable economy, stakeholders must act together to transform the global economic system. Elkington is a gifted creator of frameworks. He sees a number of forces converging to push the world in the direction of sustainability, including the concerns of activitists, the development of life-cycle technologies (businesses designing products with their life and disposal in mind, beyond solely their immediate sale), the demand for transparency and inter-action from a wide array of stakeholders, and the impacts of dwindling resources on the market. As he sees it, multi-national corporations will transform themselves from locusts (despoliators of resources for short-term profit) into honey bees (sustainable companies for the long term that are inclusive of the poor in terms of value creation), with several intermediate steps. Governments too should get involved, with encouragement, regulation, and legislation, but also as a forum for dialogue with the stakeholders.

This is an arresting vision, to be sure, but how to get there is a serious challenge. One possible (if in my view unlikely) way is through the development of accounting methods that add the concerns of non-corporate stakeholders into a triple bottom line (TBL) report that will be as important as the financial balance sheet is today. It would be honest, open to all stakeholders, and consulted by corporate governors as they plan their action for sustainability for the long term.

The only trouble is, there is little agreement on definitions, on methods, etc. The bulk of the papers in the book examine this problem from a rather technocratic point of view, looking at various models and how to improve them via action from government and international organizations as well as developing new networks for problemsolving. For example, how do you link small-scale sustainability initiatives in the firm to global environmental goals via a statistically valid measure? The details of this were way beyond my interest as a journalist, but certainly useful for academics and activists familiar with accounting.

As I came to see it, TBL at present is a mishmash of good intentions. The disarray and gaps in knowledge are so great that it is unrealistic to imagine having much of an impact on corporate behavior in this manner. But hey, many believe it is worth a try, and all power to them.

If the book stopped there, it would have hugely lessened its value. Fortunately, there are several excellent essays that challenge the notion of TBL and how it is conceived. Of particular interest is the essay by Deborah Doane. She believes that very little meaningful or credible TBL reporting is done, that tying social and environmental concerns to profit is a dead end, and that TBL is largely a tool of PR departments (unless their business models are clearly linked to TBL concerns, which in some cases they are). Indeed, she concludes, TBL has produced no lasting impact that she can discern and should be separated from bottom line concerns - in large part because the inclusion of the profit motive influences the other legs of TBL, she argues, into traditional short-term business concerns such as "reputation", brand, quarterly high margins, etc. This is strong stuff. The only way ahead, she believes, is to transform multi-national corporations into more caring institutions that are honest, plan for the long-term (i.e. beyond the quarterly report), and that all stakeholders can evaluate and influence their behavior. Once again, the whole debate returns to Elkington's vision.

This is a valuable examination of TBL. The better chapters are very good indeed, the others can be skimmed for the many valuable nuggets spread throughout them. Recommended.
0 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars I recommend! Nov. 2 2008
By YARA CINTRA - Published on
The book contains the contribution of many renowned authors from the Academic and Practitioner's world. This is a very good help to the understanding of the Triple Bottom Line Framework.

Look for similar items by category