If you like or are impressed by the way Dr. House thinks and acts, you might find the root of his philosophy in here.
I will admit that there are things that you will probably not agree with in this whole philosophy.
First, like many "perfect" philosophies, it is ultimately a utopia, probably unrealisable in practice, for its ideas can only work if the whole of humanity agreed on them up-front.
Second, don't forget that these ideas were written in a certain era, by a person who has lived through very specific things. In her time, there wasn't the same weight as today on the argument that the Earth might someday not have enough resources to satisfy everyone's endless greed. So of course she thought a single person should have the right to accumulate as much riches as he wants, if he can.
But despite its few flaws in consequence, the ontology is superb, a model of ethics as prescribed not by "the others", but by oneself. One, even alone on a desert island, is subject to ethics, call it self-respect if you will. It is refreshing to find a sound system of thought that does not advocate that the only way to be a good person is to sacrifice yourself to others.
Whether you agree ot not, I think any reasonable person should either accept these ideas, or be prepared to word a sound defense against them. But that's just me. I'm that selfish.