2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Embarassed for the author, Jan 14 2006
By kimina2 - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Young Julian (Paperback)
This is one of the few novel I've read where I've actually felt embarassed for the author. I have never seen a book with so manny spelling errors and typos. It's as if the book was never edited. The book also contains some glaring factual errors. Finally, the book is repetitive and just plain puzzling at times. Here are a few examples. On page 228 Bishop Eusebius says to Julian, "What I would like to know first is whether or not you are a Christian?" Julian's answer has nothing to do with the question. After his answer Eusebius asks, "Are you a Christian?" Julian thinks to himself (the book is in the first person) that this question is interesting and caught him off guard since it came from "a different quarter." Huh? He just asked you the same question. The novel takes place over a number of years, but it is around 350 a.d. The author repeatedly states that Rome had control of Britain for 500 years at this point. That would go back to approximately 150 b.c. Rome didn't even control Gaul at that time. Britain was invaded in 43 a.d. so it should be about 300 years. He then repeatedly states that Hadrian's Wall had been in existence for 400 years! The wall was built in 122 a.d. At the end of Chapter 13 Julian is sent to Egypt to quell a revolt by Constantius. His brother Gallus (who was Caesar in the West) has been killed and a new Caesar has been appointed, Silvianus. Julian's wife refuses to leave Constantinople to follow him anywhere. Then Chapter 14 begins and Julian is in Gaul. He is Caesar. There is no discussion of what took place in Egypt, how he got to Gaul, how he was appointed Caesar, what became of Silvianus, or why his wife is now coming to Gaul when she has to this point refused to go anywhere with him. What annoyed me most about this book was that the author thinks that on every other page he has to have Julian ask a paragraph of retorical questions. In any event, the book, as you can see is poorly written. If you want to read a novel about Julian I suggest Gore Vidal's "Julian" or perhaps Ford's "God's and Legions", which isn't great either but it is much better than this drivel.