Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Thinking From A to Z
 
 

Thinking From A to Z [Paperback]

Nigel Warburton
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
List Price: CDN$ 21.95
Price: CDN$ 18.03 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
You Save: CDN$ 3.92 (18%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover CDN $67.69  
Paperback CDN $16.02  
Paperback, Jun 14 2000 CDN $18.03  
There is a newer edition of this item:
Thinking from A to Z Thinking from A to Z 4.2 out of 5 stars (4)
CDN$ 16.02
In Stock.

Product Details


Product Description

Review

Warburton is always a very clear writer and has the knack of finding the right register to talk to the non-professional without over-simplifying or patronising. - Philosophers Magazine

Book Description

What is ‘Humpty-Dumptying’? Do ‘arguments from analogy’ ever stand up? How do I know when someone is using ‘Weasel words?’ What is a ‘Politician’s answer?’ What’s the difference between a ‘Red Herring’ and a ‘Straw Man?’


This superb book, now in its third edition, will help anyone who wants to argue well and think critically. Using witty and topical examples, this fully-updated new edition has many new entries including:



  • Charity, principle of

  • Lawyer’s Answer

  • Least Worst Option

  • Stonewalling

  • Sunk-Cost Fallacy

  • Tautology

  • Truism

  • Weasel Words

  • ‘You Would Say That Wouldn’t You’


Thinking From A to Z may not help you win every argument, but it will definitely give you the power to tell a good one from a bad one.


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

4 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.2 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars I wish I had read this book 25 years ago..., Oct 23 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: Thinking From A to Z (Paperback)
If I had read this book 25 years ago, I would have saved myself the confusions and frustrations of spending a great deal of time and effort trying to make sense of certain "New Age" authors whose pretentions were only matched by their (now obvious) lack of clear reasoning ability. This book is short and easy to read and understand, and its concepts are essential for avoiding the kinds of distortions and lies which are unfortunately so highly prevalent in any open society. Free speech is great, but we must all arm ourselves against the people who want to take advantage of our willingness to give other points of view the benefit of our doubts.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2.0 out of 5 stars May Not Be What You're Looking For . . ., July 30 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: Thinking From A to Z (Paperback)
The title is too broad for what the book is essentially about: providing brief explanations of logical reasoning and fallacies. The "A to Z" is basically the format of the book, starting with such "A" terms like the ad hominem fallacy and moving to "Z". This format may be cute and useful when you need to know a specific definition, but generally unhelpful at giving you a brief introduction to logic.

This book is very slim, resembling a pocket dictionary -- but in this case, it's a pocket guide to informal logic terms and fallacies. Each little definition of a term is very brief, with usually only one small example illustrating how the term is used correctly or incorrectly.

Quite honestly, I found Anthony Weston's "A Rulebook for Arguments" more effective as a concise book on logical arguments. This book seems more like a nifty little gift you'd give to a philosophy major, rather than a handy reference material you'd depend on. At the cover price, I would think that most people would rather invest in Weston's book as a reference guide.

I hope this clears up any confusion about the contents of this book. If you're still not sure, I'd advise you to check the book out at the library or bookstore before buying.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars The ABC's of Analysis and Argumentation, Jan 26 2002
By 
George R Dekle "Bob Dekle" (Lake City, FL United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Thinking From A To Z (Paperback)
I believe it was P.T. Barnum who said "You'll never go broke underestimating the public." Barnum was speaking hyperbolically (I hope), but it is true that many otherwise intelligent people will fall prey to the most outlandish fraud and manipulation. In addition to protecting the reader against conmen, this little book will serve as an antidote to fuzzy thinking in general.

"Thinking" is set up like a dictionary, with alphabetical entries and boldfaced cross references. This arrangement makes the work somewhat user-unfriendly. You can't analyze an argument by looking it up in the book. You won't know what entry to look under. Reading the book straight through from A to Z makes the presentation somewhat disjointed because related ideas are scattered throughout the book depending on what letter of the alphabet they begin with.

A good way to attack the book is to start at A and read the entries in alphabetical order, stopping to look up and read each cross reference as you come to it. Thus you'd read "Absurd consequences move" first, and then skip to "reductio ad absurdum," "refutation," and the other terms cross referenced in the entry. Then you'd read the next alphabetical entry and all its cross references, and so on until you come to the end of the book. If you follow this procedure with each alphabetical entry, re-reading every term each time it is cross referenced, by the time you get to "Zig-zagging," you will have a good handle on all types of logical and illogical arguments. You'll also be able to analytically dissect advertisements, newscasts, op-ed pieces, and political speeches.

"Thinking," gives an excellent grounding in rhetorical analysis that will serve you well the next time someone tries to pull the wool over your eyes.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
 Go to Amazon.com to see all 9 reviews  4.6 out of 5 stars 
 
 
Most recent customer reviews


Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Amazon.ca Privacy Statement Amazon.ca Shipping Information Amazon.ca Returns & Exchanges