Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Ambiguous and Provocative, Feb 3 2002
This review is from: Third Miracle (VHS Tape)
Made by a Polish director Agnieszka Holland, whose work is always controversial and often not accepted well by the American critics, this is not your typical Hollywood movie. It will be appreciated by people who feel that not all the answers can be found on a therapist's couch and who don't mind deliberate ambiguity of her work, which is designed to raise important questions that may be different for different viewers. The answers we should find within ourselves. Although it is definitely a "Catholic Movie" and the Catholic theme is presented honestly and impartially, the movie rises above just one particular religion (Agnieszka Holland wrote and directed an acclaimed holocaust movie "Europa, Europa" which was denied German Oscar Committee nomination under quite bizarre circumstances. It's available in German with English subtitles). Those who panic each time they come across ideas that touch that extra dimension within themselves that some call faith or spirituality and others just live with without giving a name, will find this movie weird and annoying. And in fact, this is the first question this movie raises: why do we have this need for the spiritual? What is faith and how much or little of it one needs? Do you have to take the miracles literally? Do you believe that everything that happens in "The Wizard of Oz" can actually happen? Of course not, but it creates an appropriate setting for investigation of some fundamental questions. Some of the questions: where is the line between good and evil and even more important: is there a line? Where does this saint-to-be fall on the spectrum between good and evil? But then there is an answer: it really doesn't matter whether she is good or not in our understanding, because "It's God who makes the saints, not us". This woman has some special connection, but why? Her miracles are almost worthless. "If you ask me, God wasted a miracle" says the mother of a saved girl who grew up to became a junkie and a prostitute. "God loves the sinner." Do we really understand what that means? Another miracle happens during WWII. "What is the point of saving one family when millions, millions died?" asks one of the tribunal judges. Saved by the miracle are a gypsy girl, a Catholic priest and a wounded German soldier. Hmm... The plot is deeper than that, but I don't want to spoil it for those who haven't seen the movie. The WWII theme is extremely important and is a glue that holds it all together, though it takes only about 5 minutes of the whole film. Why is it so important? Is it because without evil there won't be good? Ed Harris is outstanding as Father Shore. A complex character that will require a separate review. Frank Shore is a man who probably would have made a better cop than a priest (he was raised by his cop father after all). He didn't really choose to become a priest. God chose him. Oh, you really have to see Ed Harris in this role. Anne Heche is colorful and very believable as the woman's daughter. Some reviewers complain about intimate scenes between Father Shore and Roxanne. But how else would you appreciate the totality of their sacrifice without almost physically experiencing the totality of their attraction. I can't even call what was between them love. It was some fatalistic attraction of two abandoned souls. All these scenes are done in good taste. They never consummated their relationship and I don't see what there is to be upset about. Absolutely beautiful scene: they dance on the grave of her mother with a bottle of vodka. You have to see this. Another amazing scene in the beginning when the daughter watches with intense emotion the video of her mother happily playing with the kids at the orphanage. It's visibly painful for her because this is the same mother who had abandoned her as a teenager, causing a lot of pain and a sense of rejection. Frank Shore, on the other hand, sees the same scene with the eyes of a motherless boy. For him, this woman is love. Is Roxanne the other side of her mother? Not a saint, not even a believer, she produces her own miracle, a miracle of a different kind. In fact, there are more than 3 miracles in this movie and anybody can argue which one is the third. I think the fact that there are film makers out there who ignore the Hollywood proven recipe for box office success and make movies that are different is a little miracle by itself. What does it all mean? There are things that are better not understood. Like in a beautiful verse, you will find new meaning each time you read it. Of course in the end the answer is: "God wastes no miracle". And though the movie has a "happy ending" it doesn't leave you with the sense of a compromise, but rather bewildered and astonished. Armin Mueller-Stahl, who plays "the devil's advocate" during the tribunal hearings needs to be mentioned as an outstanding actor. But there are so many gems in this movie that it just needs to be seen.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
praying for a miracle, Nov 11 2001
Father Frank Shore became a priest after promising God that he would do so if his policeman father survived a near fatal shooting. But he seems to have always been at least somewhat skeptical about the whole deal. When we are introduced to him in the film he has gone well beyond simple skepticism and is living in an inner city Chicago flophouse, openly doubting his calling. But the local bishop has need of his services, however reluctant, because Frank serves as a postulator, investigating alleged miracles and potential saints, and at the moment strong claims are being put forward for the beatification of an immigrant woman named Helen O'Regan. O'Regan has been dead for several years but on the day of her memorial service a young girl who she had befriended entered the church covered in blood which had dripped from the eyes of a statue as she prayed to or for Helen. The event would be remarkable enough in its own right, but even more startling is the fact that it cured the child of lupus. Since that time parishioners have come to believe that the statue, which performs similarly during rainstorms every November (the month of Helen's death), has healing powers and that Helen was a saint. Frank has earned a reputation as a debunker of such claims, and with it the nickname "The Miracle Killer", but his most recent effort precipitated his downward spiral. In that case Frank himself felt intimations of the divine and even witnessed a miraculous cure, but he ultimately disproved the virtue of the cleric involved. His crisis of conscience resulted from the knowledge that he had destroyed peoples faith in something tangible, even if extrareligious, in the service of a Church and a God that he is not certain he truly believes in. Now he wants "God to show his face", in order that he may believe that it has all been worthwhile. And so he heads off to St. Stanislaus with a doubting mind but an open heart. Everything that he finds there gives him reason to believe in Helen O'Reagan. This portion of the movie is very much a classic detective story, a kind of Catholic hard-boiled noir, with Frank as the gumshoe. The main complication that Frank faces in this phase of the case is an attraction to the daughter Helen pretty much abandoned when she entered the church. That daughter, Roxanne (Ann Heche), sixteen at the time but now grown, is naturally resentful and baffled by the notion that her mother might become just the fourth American saint. Given the conventions of Hollywood this love interest is probably inevitable and it is handled as well as could possibly be expected, but it would be a better film without it. In the second half of the movie, which becomes a courtroom melodrama, Frank has to defend the case for Helen's sainthood against an extremely hostile and Ameriphobic devil's advocate, an Archbishop (played by Armin Mueller-Stahl) who is visiting from Rome. Frank's own wavering faith becomes an issue in the hearing, but so too does the Archbishop's personal unwillingness to grant the possibility that an uncultured American immigrant woman could be a vessel of God. Director Agnieskia Holland is not quite at top form here, at least not at the peak level she reached in Europa, Europa and The Secret Garden, but she never stoops to condescend to this material, which is pretty unusual in the modern cinema. There are some characterizations that are a tad too hackneyed and some of the shots at the Catholic Church are too easy, too cheap, to be taken seriously; but even the villains, all clerics, of the piece ultimately prove to have more complex motivations than we first believe. Meanwhile, there are some really fine set pieces, particularly the discussions between Frank and his colleagues, where faith is taken seriously and discussed with passion, insight, and altogether appropriate awe. Now, for each of these essays I try to find all the links I can to other reviews that are available online. In doing so for this movie I was first amused then angered by the frequency with which the following sentiment cropped up : this is yet another film about a priest wrestling with his faith. Yet another? Hold back the deluge! This is not to say that the central dilemma here is unique; it is not. It treads some of the ground covered by The Exorcist, which despite its reputation as a mere horror film is a compelling depiction of a priest's struggle to believe, but it does so without all the special effects, profanity, and other shockers and its particular concerns are very different. I guess it is also somewhat similar to Stigmata which was unfortunately released at roughly the same time. But so what? If Silence of the Lambs didn't exhaust the topic of serial killers and Porky's didn't obviate the need for inane scatological teen comedies, a bare handful of films sure as Hell didn't dispose of the questions surrounding belief in God. The winner of the Academy Award in 2000, which I think is when Third Miracle would have been eligible, was American Beauty. Did we really need yet another look at the desperation of the suburbs and the dysfunctioning family? The answer is : if the film is good, by all means, another look is fine. But the same goes for The Third Miracle and the subjects it deals with. I don't know; maybe the questions raised in the Third Miracle just resonate with me because I've reached a certain age and temperament, but I find the problem of faith to be quite fascinating. How, in an Age of Reason and of Skepticism, can we believe in a God who no longer chooses to reveal himself to us through prophets, messiahs, and miracles? Personally, I find the intellectual case for God to be compelling, but a miracle would sure close the deal. At any rate, if your mind is so closed that you can not allow for the possibility of God or the miraculous, or if you think the serious exploration of religious faith has become as ubiquitous as the car chase in recent movies, by all means, skip this one. But if you appreciate great acting (Ed Harris is especially good) and beautiful film making, and you're still curious about why we do or don't choose to believe in God, then you owe it to yourself to watch The Third Miracle. GRADE : B+
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Yes, miracles do happen!, Jan 12 2003
I am a Roman Catholic and I understand the whole, lengthy and deeply exhausting investigative process surrounding beatification and canonization. I also know that non Catholics and non Christians don't understand it and may even think that the Church arbitrarily elevates anyone it wants to Sainthoood. This film, "The Third Miracle", does a fairly good job exploring the canonization process in a feature film. Granted, times and themes have changed since "The Song Of Bernadette" won the Best Film Oscar in 1944 exploring the "Marian Miracle" theme, but it is reassuring that this type of screenplay still makes for a moving and haunting film. Sadly, the film did not get a lot of promotion or ballyoo even though it was marvelously produced, had high production values and featured superb performances by Ed Harris, Anne Heche and a host of other notable supportng players. Ed Harris is truly one of the screens most riveting actors and even his smaller screen parts are unforgettable for their realism, intensity and strength. Anne Heche is perfect as the wayward, doubting daughter especially in her meetings with Father Shore. My only criticisms, and they are mild, involve the smoking, drinking clergy portrayed and their seeming love of socializing and the "good life". Also, the ending was too unexplained and it left you somewhat dangling as to how Roxanne acquired her child. Was she married? To whom? Was the child adopted? Where was the husband? It would seem that Father Shore and Roxanne would have had something more profound to say to one another after such an emotional and harrowing experience. In summation, many believers and non believers, those of strong faith and those who have doubts about their beliefs, will take something different away from this film. I would only add that we will never understand God's ways. To those who believe no proof is necessary. To those who don't, all the proof in the world is irrelevant. Dick Bobnick
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|