Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Three Views On The Rapture: Pre; Mid; Or Post-tribulation [Paperback]

Gleason L Archer
3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
List Price: CDN$ 21.99
Price: CDN$ 15.87 & FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
You Save: CDN$ 6.12 (28%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Tuesday, July 29? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback CDN $14.59  
Paperback, Sept. 10 1996 CDN $15.87  
Join Amazon Student in Canada

Book Description

Sept. 10 1996 Counterpoints
This book explores three views on the Rapture--Pre; Mid; and Post-Tribulation.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Product Details

Product Description

From the Publisher

Three Trinity Evangelical Divinity School professors present their premillennnialist views on when the rapture will occur - before, during, or after the tribulation. Paul D. Feinberg argues the pre-tribulation position. Gleason L. Archer presents the mid-tribulation position. Douglas J. Moo holds the post-tribulation view. Richard Reiter gives a historical overview. Previously titled The Rapture.

From the Back Cover

Premillennialists continue to be divided on the question of the Rapture of the church. Will it occur before, in the middle of, or after the Tribulation? Drs. Feinberg (Pre), Archer (Mid), and Moo (Post) present the case for the position each holds. This format allows the reader to see the three positions in dialogue with one another, thus clarifying the distinctives and revealing the strengths and weaknesses of each. Firmly held and clearly stated convictions are tempered by an irenic spirit. The book is introduced by Richard Reiter's helpful essay tracing the history of this debate in American evangelicalism.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
Richard R. Reiter is Market Data Systems Manager, Nations-Banc-CRT, Chicago, Illinois. Read the first page
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

3.3 out of 5 stars
3.3 out of 5 stars
Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars Pretty Decent for a "Multiple Views" book Aug. 25 2010
Upon reading Three Views of the Rapture, I was not sure what to expect. Coming from church circles (Mennonite and Pentecostal) where eschatology was a vague assortment of rampant and disassociated proof-texting, as well as a indiscriminate application of Deuteronomy 29:29 ("The secret things belong to the LORD") and vague "Jesus wins" statements, I knew I had a default view of the rapture that was neither informed nor biblically articulate. Beyond that, I knew that the various positions I had encountered were variations of misunderstandings of mid-tribulationalism and post-tribulationalism, so I was not sure what to expect. Honestly, in my youth I was taught that matters of eschatology boiled down to "our experts and proof texts versus their experts and proof texts" and though I don't believe that anymore, I had a tiny inkling of skepticism that one position would stand out above the other two. Gladly, this was not the case (though I admittedly found the book a difficult read, given the technical level of argumentation and the sophistication of the arguments presented).

That being said, one of the things that impressed me the most in Three Views of the Rapture was the level of scholarly presentation and interaction in the positions presented. Entering in, I was not terribly familiar with Paul Fienberg, but both Douglas Moo and Gleason A. Archer were familiar names to me, and I was pleased at the high level of representation they brought to their respective fields. Their cases were technical (albeit verbose) and showed a generally high view of scripture.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
I really enjoyed reading this book. I was required to read it for a class on eschatology, and I found it refreshing to see that all three rapture views were based on solid biblical rationale. Obviously, only one (or none) of the views can be right, but the authors did a great job of outlining and explaining each view's weaknesses and strengths. I found myself sympathizing with whatever view I was reading, and agree with the general consensus that the rapture view is an inference from Scripture that does not necessarily have a set of proof texts to describe. A rapture position must be decided upon by looking at the Bible systematically, which enters in much human interpretation. I don't think the rapture issue is a very significant Biblical issue when compared to dozens of other doctrines and subjects that the Bible speaks of. But the Bible does mention being 'caught up' so we should study diligently to understand what this means. This book provides a scholarly examination on what the 'catching up' can possibly mean.
Was this review helpful to you?
4.0 out of 5 stars Great Backgrounder Jan. 22 2004
The timing of the rapture is a matter of much debate these days, and in order to have a discussion in what I call "the James 3 tradition" (respect, love, humility, and grace), it helps to have an accurate understanding of what the other positions are and why others hold to them. As such, this book does a good job of describing three of the four main premillennial positions on this topic. I believe the omission of the emerging and rapidly mainstreaming prewrath position, however, was an unfortunate oversight that I hope will be corrected in future editions.
One of the most fascinating aspects of this book is its introduction that discusses the development of the pretrib, midtrib, and posttrib positions. When one understands how these positions developed and why one gained more steam and notoriety than others, one begins to understand why popularity alone does not determine orthodoxy.
Interestingly, the origination of the pretrib concept in the early 1800s and its rapid deployment throughout the evangelical circles in the 1900s had less to do with good practices of scriptural interpretation than a response to the amillennial interpretations that had dominated for centuries, combined with popular exposure to this position due to power and resources of its defenders during a time of relative scriptural ignorance among the general population. The midtrib and posttrib positions developed in the academic circles in response to the perceived error of rapidly popularizing pretrib position, but they came too late; pretrib had already become entrenched. Such background is fascinating and necessary for any student of the rapture and helps to put the positions themselves into perspective.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
By A Customer
Perhaps I'm just getting tired of reading the same information, repeated by different people. The temptation with three points of view of the rapture is to be complacent (there's no need to worry, we'll be safe), or scared (because we don't have the facts). But then, what if I'm wrong in my choice of one of three? What if all three of those viewpoints are wrong?
The point I'm trying to make is there cannot be 'three' viewpoints on the rapture. Sometimes I wonder if authors raise more questions to mask the fact that they cannot answer the question directly. But somewhere in the Bible there is only 'one' answer to this question.
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars Not convincing
It is interesting to read Three Views on the Rapture but I'm convinced that none of three views is biblical. Read more
Published on Jan. 7 2002 by Martin Aquiles G. Penaco
3.0 out of 5 stars A Decent Treatment, Not Great But Adequate
The format, three predominant views of premillenialism set side by side intrigued me. I was a little bit disappointed because all three scholars are from the same school, Trinity... Read more
Published on April 12 2001 by Mark Jones
4.0 out of 5 stars This is how it should be done
The most exciting thing about this book is the way that the contributors can disagree about this topic and yet not let it hinder their fellowship or their love for one another. Read more
Published on Jan. 10 2001 by Dave Washburn
3.0 out of 5 stars Redundant Rebuttals
I agree with the last reviewer on just about everything. It's helpful to have the three predominant views about the rapture side-by-side. Read more
Published on July 31 2000 by David Haggith
3.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book (if you're a well-studied premillenialist)
It is interesting to read a defense of three main views on when the rapture will take place -- before, in the middle of, or at the end of the Great Tribulation. Read more
Published on Dec 28 1999 by Todd Grotenhuis
3.0 out of 5 stars A Balanced Discussion
A friendly discussion of three points of view regarding the rapture. Gives pros and cons to each view. Read more
Published on Dec 16 1999 by David Haggith
4.0 out of 5 stars A study and counterpoint of three rapture views.
Three Views on the Rapture assumes a premillennial eschatology and contrasts the three primary rapture views. It is scholarly and probably not for the average reader. Read more
Published on May 13 1999 by Todd Hudnall
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Look for similar items by category