|New from||Used from|
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
Is there anything new to say about whether the death penalty should be abolished? It turns out there is. Bestselling author Turow (Reversible Errors) has some useful insights into this fiercely debated subject, based on his experiences as a prosecutor and, in his postprosecutorial years, working on behalf of death-row inmates, and his two years on Illinois's Commission on Capital Punishment, charged by the former Gov. George Ryan with examining how the death penalty might be more fairly administered. This is a sober and elegantly concise examination of a complex, fraught topic by an admitted "agnostic." His views veering one way and then the other, Turow shares his back-and-forth reasoning as he carefully discusses each issue, from the possible execution of an innocent person (a serious danger) to whether execution is a deterrent (it's not). Perhaps most illuminating are Turow's thoughts on victims' rights (which he says must be weighed against the needs of the community); on what to do with "the worst of the worst" (he visits a maximum security prison to meet multiple-murderer Henry Brison, who, Turow says, "most closely resembles... Hannibal Lecter"); and the question of what he calls "moral proportion," the notion that execution is meant to restore moral balance, which, he says, requires an "unfailingly accurate" system of justice. This measured weighing of the facts will be most valuable to those who, like Turow, are on the fence-they will find an invaluable, objective look at both sides of this critical but highly charged debate.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Popular legal-fiction writer Turow takes on the divisive topic of the death penalty in this concise, thoughtful essay. A self-proclaimed "death penalty agnostic," Turow didn't consider himself an expert on the issue even during his years as a prosecutor or when he helped in the defense of some high-profile capital cases. Nonetheless, in early 2000, after Illinois governor George Ryan declared a moratorium on further executions, Turow was appointed to a 14-member blue-ribbon commission charged with helping reform the state's capital punishment system. Ryan's groundbreaking moratorium began a wave of similar actions nationwide as more and more guilty convictions were questioned, whether via new DNA evidence or an overzealous prosecutorial machine (in two key cases in Illinois, a little of both). Turow traces the recent history of the death penalty through his own experiences, and though he was ambivalent about it at the start, he comes away with definite convictions. This is not a scientific study, Turow admits, but he does supply ample notes to back up many of the claims he makes throughout the book. Also included is the commission's report as submitted to Governor Ryan. Together with Mark Fuhrman's more procedural study, Death and Justice [BKL Jl 03], Turow's reflections will spark further discussions on this troublesome issue. Mary Frances Wilkens
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
lu d'autres livres plus convainquant sur la peine de mort, celui-ci est un peu superficiel, il est donc étrange qu'il soit recommandé par un universitaire.Published 18 months ago by marc israel
The author of this book presents an unbiased report of his experience dealing with the Death Penalty issue. Read morePublished on July 18 2006 by A. Harris
Turow takes his skills as a story teller and lawyer and fuses them to make clear and convincing arguments against the death penalty, both moral and practial. Read morePublished on Feb. 25 2004
Scott Turow's ULTIMATE PUNISHMENT: A Lawyers Reflection on Dealing with the Death Penalty is his reflection on the work he did on Gov. Read morePublished on Dec 8 2003 by Duncan Stroup
Calling himself a "death penalty agnostic," Turow takes a moderate position on the death penalty. Read morePublished on Nov. 3 2003 by Adam Woodrum
I'm married to someone who has prosecuted death penalty cases, so I'm well aware of the pros and cons. Read morePublished on Nov. 3 2003 by Joe Lee
Not a bad read...pretty good really. Reasonably thought proving in a moderate way. It might not be a bad idea to have a read of this book yourself. Read morePublished on Nov. 2 2003 by Goodbye
I graduated from Law School 20 years ago and my vexing struggle with the death penalty is a real now as it was then. Read morePublished on Oct. 28 2003 by MovedbyMusic