| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Park is well-acquainted with voodoo science in all its forms. Since 1982, he has headed the Washington, D.C., office of the American Physical Society, and he has carried the flag for scientific rationality through cold fusion, homeopathy, "Star Wars," quantum healing, and sundry attempts to repeal the laws of thermodynamics. Park shows why a "disproportionate share of the science seen by the public is flawed" (because shaky science is more likely to skip past peer review and head straight for the media), and he gives a good tour of recent highlights in Voodoo. He has a rare ability to poke holes compassionately, without excoriating those taken in by their fondest wishes. Park is less forgiving of scientists (especially Edward Teller) when he thinks they've fallen down on the job, a job that should include helping the public separate the scientific wheat from the voodoo chaff. --Mary Ellen Curtin --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Some crackpot reviewers here,
By K (Maryland) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud (Hardcover)
If you choose to believe in such things as homeopathy, acupuncture, and their ilk, then you won't like this book. Some of the reviewers here have posted their "evidence" contradicting Park's refutations of such fields. However, simply citing a reference or a person's position does not mean what they say is true. Some governments do fund "alternative medicine" research, but the larger scientific community does not respect this work. I am a scientist. I _could_ make up some ridiculous theory and find _someone_ to publish it. Does that mean you should believe it?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Tightly written, engaging, fun ... and informative,
By A Customer
This review is from: Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud (Paperback)
Robert Park is a talented and smart writer who has crammed this book full of interesting facts and forceful counter-blasts against the endless "voodoo science" we are subjected to on a daily basis. One big revelation for me -- homeopathy is total hokum. I had no idea the various unique doses contain no ingredients, apart from the lactose pill or water (Park savages homeopathy in a chapter on the placebo effect). I also enjoyed his mention of how a schoolgirl invented a double-blind test that proved "touch therapy" was a load of cobblers (therapists put both hands through individual holes in a screen, while the girl would see if they could tell which hand she was holding hers under ... they got it right only 44% of the time, worse than not trying at all!). Get this book!
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Certainly no Carl Sagan,
By Kenneth S. Norton (Mill Valley, CA USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud (Paperback)
I was very disappointed in this book, especially since I have been impressed with the role that Park has played as a voice of reason in the popular press. My complaints with the book basically boil down to two primary concerns - its pace and structure, and Park's tone. The book jumps around so much it's almost impossible to read. Park's style is to begin with an anecdote, then say "before we look at that, let's investigate the science behind it", which in turn leads to another example, and ad infinitum. Several chapters later he may or may not return to the example he started with, and by then you've forgotten the details. Far too many chapters and paragraphs begin with "fifteen years later..." or "ten years before that..." Contrast this with a popular science writer like Carl Sagan, who was a master at explaining the science behind his examples without losing the reader. But my biggest disappointment with the book is Park's condescending tone, especially as it relates to the wonder behind science. Writers such as Sagan or Michael Shermer allow us to question bad science while empathizing with the reasons that attract people to it. It's that understanding that helps us counter pseudoscience without alienating. For example, Sagan, in <i>The Demon-Haunted World</i>, captures his skepticism about God while simultaneously sharing an overwhelming desire to see his loved ones again, to want an afterlife to be real while knowing it probably isn't. Park, on the other hand, attacks bad (or just impractical) science in a detached, holier-than-thou manner. His reasoning is strong, but he's missing too much of the argument. In one example, he attacks the manned space program as impractical and expensive without so much as acknowledging the wonder and imagination that drives us to send humans, not just machines, into the skies. He almost makes you feel guilty for loving the Apollo program. It's that wonder and a love of science that makes Sagan so readable and this book so disappointing.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
|
Most recent customer reviews |
|