Auto boutiques-francophones Simple and secure cloud storage fallcleaning Crocktober Music Deals Store NFL Barbecue
  • List Price: CDN$ 42.83
  • You Save: CDN$ 1.93 (5%)
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.
War of the Worldviews: Sc... has been added to your Cart
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Ships from USA. Allow 1 - 3 weeks for delivery to Canada. Reliable carrier, though they only deliver to Canadian postal service, who we are relying on for final destination delivery. International orders (non-Canada) allow additional week for delivery. Publisher overstock or return with minor shelfwear. May have remainder mark. Carefully inspected. Please compare feedback. Thank you for your business.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

War of the Worldviews: Science vs. Spirituality Library Binding – Large Print, Feb 1 2012

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Library Binding, Large Print
"Please retry"
CDN$ 40.90
CDN$ 4.69 CDN$ 3.06

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.

Product Details

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 2 reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Brilliant messages from two brilliant thinkers Dec 18 2013
By Sanjay C. Patel - Published on
Format: Library Binding
This book is precisely about what its title states: worldviews. It’s not about comparing and contrasting the detailed cosmological beliefs of science or religion(s). In fact, it does not really compare or contrast very much at all between them.Yet, it is very enlightening.

Here is a sample of the subjects:
1. How did the universe emerge?
2. Is the universe conscious?
3. What is life?
4. How do genes work?
5. What is the connection between brain and mind?
6. Is there a fundamental reality?

Following is how the book flows.

Deepak presents an essay on a particular subject outlining his predominantly personal views on religion and spirituality. I say personal, because he gives very few references for what he states. I sympathize with this because it's difficult to pin down spiritual beliefs to any single scriptural passage or spiritual founder. People from various faiths and within various denominations have different ideas about Scripture and the Divine. So Deepak cannot really speak for all religion or all spirituality.

However, he writes intelligibly and intelligently. What he says makes a lot of sense. For instance, he says that spirituality did not begin with God. It began with consciousness. On the surface, this may seem like a stretch or overly intellectual. But it isn’t. Spirituality, as distinct from religion, is certainly more mystical, abstract, and intellectual. This is broadly true for all faiths.

Moreover, in ancient yoga 3000 years ago, the question the Indian mystics asked was not “who is God?” It was “who am I?" (ko ham, in Sanskrit.) This is the angle Deepak takes.

On the other side, essays on the same subjects are written by the physicist and atheist Leonard Mlodinow. It does not even seem that both of them had read each other’s essays and really answered each other’s points. So the essays are non-confrontational and quite friendly. The reader is left to decide how to meld the two worldviews.

In the same vein as Deepak's, not all physicists, scientists, or atheists share the same worldview either. So Mlodinow, like Deepak, speaks mostly for himself and a certain sector of like-minded people. Mlodinow writes lucidly and honestly. I myself believe in God. But I still find that Mlodinow’s articles are intellectually honest. He is not a militant atheist. He is not rude, sarcastic, or obnoxious. He’s careful and perceptive.

In fact, Mlodinow goes on record saying that “While science often casts doubt on spiritual beliefs and doctrines insofar as they make representations about the physical world, science does not – and cannot – conclude that God is an illusion.” (Pg. 256) I think that says it all.

This book comprises a compilation of beautiful essays by two brilliant thinkers in two opposite fields discussing overlapping subjects of dispute and interest. Dive in and enjoy!

Full disclosure: I am a peer-reviewed researcher and author on this subject as well as emerging connections between ancient yoga and the Bible. Sanjay C Patel
Science v. Spirituality: A debate between a leading proponent of each view. July 3 2015
By John Martin - Published on
Format: Library Binding
War of the Worldviews consists of a debate between Deepak Chopra and Leonard Mlodinow on spirituality versus science, with Chopra taking the former position and Mlodinow the latter. The debate covers a wide variety of topics starting with questions about the universe—how did it emerge, is it conscious, is it evolving and even is it alive. The next section deals with issues relating to life—what it is, what makes us human, how do genes work and did Darwin go wrong. The next part is concerned with the mind and the brain and examines such topics as the connection between the two, is the brain like a computer and does the universe think through us. The last section is concerned with questions relating to God—is God an illusion, what is the future of belief and is there a fundamental reality.

Chopra’s basic position is that there is a consciousness in the universe that all human beings can and should connect with. He makes it clear that he is talking about spirituality and not religion and a God who is the creator of all things. He criticizes Mlodinow and science for its focus on material matters and its reliance on proof before accepting something as true and real. Mlodinow, of course, takes the opposite perspective, providing rational, science-based, explanations for earthly phenomena. He says that science can and has been shown to be wrong and thus corrects itself, whereas there is no way to examine or correct the idea of a universal consciousness.

My own, biased view, is that Mlodinow wins this debate easily. For example, he says that we do not need an external and conscious universe to make our lives meaningful. Our life is as meaningful as we choose to make it. He agrees that the universe does have a pattern—the laws of physics, but why nature follows such laws is still a mystery. His issue with Chopra is whether or not something consciously designed this pattern. Further, he says that science cannot say that there is or is not a consciousness in the universe. The concept is simply beyond our understanding and Chopra’s insistence that there is a consciousness is based purely on faith. Chopra, he says, attributes positive human values and behaviors, such as love and kindness, to this universal consciousness, but fails to also attribute negative values and behaviors, such as violence and hate, to it as well. If there is a consciousness, Mlodinow says, it is responsible for both aspects of human behavior.

I think this book is well worth reading and you may well have a different viewpoint depending on your orientation. Chopra says that religion is dying out in favor of spirituality, but Mlodinow counters by pointing out that religion still plays a powerful role in the world. I see Chopra’s perspective as a kind of Eastern mysticism, while Mlodinow is practical and provides real answers to life’s mysteries. I rate this book at five stars because it does help you think through what are life's more important questions. At the same time the discussion misses a key point, namely that science and spirituality (religion) are about two different things and, seen in that light, there is no need for disagreement between the two.