Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Primer on real-life networks with a red thread, Feb 4 2007
This review is from: Weak Links: The Universal Key to the Stability of Networks and Complex Systems (Hardcover)
If you ever needed another good reason to value your grandmother even more, you'll find the answer in "Weak links". Structurally, his book starts with an exposition on network theory and terminology, then the application and discussion of these concepts to real-life complex systems on many scales and applied to many domains (physical, natural, technological, social). His main point is, as the reviewer noted above, that 'weak' links (weak: addition/removal does not statistically affect the average of some metric) stabilize systems. The book has thorough footnotes, one can delve as deep as one would like into the professional papers. In addition, Csermely is an honest scholar - he shows his hands when there is mere speculation (you have to see the book's unique pictograms to appreciate the effects) After pouring through several alternatives, I have adopted this book as a textbook for my Science of Networks class (I'm CS fac at an elite US liberal arts school), and I recommend it to anyone without hesitation for a readable, and learned exposition. I only have two or three caveats from a specialist's point of view: The phenomenological discovery of power laws in complex systems is not unusual and may not be evidence of any SF properties. Scale-free is an abused term, and I wish the controversy about it were explained a bit more. Also, from a modelling point of view, I wish Doyle and Carlson's work on HOT systems were discussed in more depth. But these are minor points, relatively speaking. This is a gem of a book: erudite, humane, funny, accessible and thoroughly fascinating. On every page, there are delights that lead down new intellectual paths. Csermely did a great service to pedagogy and to this budding science with this magisterial survey. Outstanding in its ease of access for intelligent undergraduates and commendable for intellectual honesty - I wish more books (textbooks and otherwise) were written this way. While I can understand the point of view of the previous reviewer, I do not share the rather dismissive characterization of Csermely's book as the product of a 'mad scientist' and (a bit insulting) '[non-serious] researcher'. Network analysis is a relatively young field, and as such, hunches, speculative inquiries are part of the consolidation process, and should not be dismissed so casually. Csermely's credentials should also give some pause.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting ideas, some humour, but lacks coherence and details, Dec 1 2006
This review is from: Weak Links: The Universal Key to the Stability of Networks and Complex Systems (Hardcover)
I am studying the brain, and as such I often read about neural networks. I thought that the idea behind this book was interesting, so I took a chance. The author first reviews some basic concepts of networks (basic to those who are well-versed in this, but to others this section would be necessary), and then proceeds in later chapters to introduce his ideas of how weak links influence and stabilize networks, using a variety of research domains as evidence. However, while being interesting ideas with some merit, the book is written more from the perspective of a mad scientist than from the perspective of a serious researcher... and one that suffers from the "my new theory explains all" syndrome at that! The author acknowledges this, and actually means this to be humorous, but this can be a hit-or-miss. He also has sections where he goes into wild speculations (to his credit, these are well-marked as such, so readers not interested in wild speculations can easily skip these sections). Occasional rantings with Spike (his inner annoying voice) also comes in as a humorous distraction - but again, a hit-or-miss. This does not take away from the merit of the ideas though, it speaks solely to the manner that the book is written, and some readers may enjoy this more than I have. The main problem that I have is that some of the ideas are not well presented. I was confused about the chaperones in the preface (not a good start), and I find that many of his ideas could be better supported with either more examples from research, or more details about the studies reported. The content should be made more accessible to people without extensive background in the topics covered, especially, as the author likes to point out, researchers from these different fields of research rarely compare notes. Perhaps a good book to use as a fun introduction to networks with diverse applications, just not exactly what I expected when I ordered it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Primer on real-life networks with a theme, Feb 1 2007
By DDDDDDD - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Weak Links: The Universal Key to the Stability of Networks and Complex Systems (Hardcover)
If you ever needed another good reason to value your grandmother even more, you'll find the answer in "Weak links". Structurally, his book starts with an exposition on network theory and terminology, then the application and discussion of these concepts to real-life complex systems on many scales and applied to many domains (physical, natural, technological, social). His main point is, as the reviewer noted above, that 'weak' links (weak: additional/removal does not statistically affect the average of some metric) stabilize systems. The book has thorough footnotes, one can delve as deep as one would like into the professional papers. In addition, Csermely is an honest scholar - he shows his hands when there is mere speculation (you have to see the book's unique pictograms to appreciate the effects) After pouring through several alternatives, I have adopted this book as a textbook for my Science of Networks class (I'm CS fac at an elite US liberal arts school), and I recommend it to anyone without hesitation for a readable, and learned exposition. I only have two or three caveats from a specialist's point of view: The phenomenological discovery of power laws in complex systems is not unusual and may not be evidence of any SF properties. Scale-free is an abused term, and I wish the controversy about it were explained a bit more. Also, from a modelling point of view, I wish Doyle and Carlson's work on HOT systems were discussed in more depth. But these are minor points, relatively speaking. This is a gem of a book: erudite, humane, funny, accessible and thoroughly fascinating. On every page, there are delights that lead down new intellectual paths. Csermely did a great service to pedagogy and to this budding science with this magisterial survey. Outstanding in its ease of access for intelligent undergraduates and commendable for intellectual honesty - I wish more books (textbooks and otherwise) were written this way.
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Weak Links Stabilize Complex Systems, May 13 2006
By Craig L. Howe "The Pointed Pundit" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Weak Links: The Universal Key to the Stability of Networks and Complex Systems (Hardcover)
It is an intriguing concept. Weak links, invisible in many networks, are critical to its stability. In this book, Peter Csermely shows that all networks, from the universe to molecules are governed by the same principles. Regardless of the system -- atoms, cells, companies, web pages or countries -- surprisingly, the weak links stabilize each. Csermely, a professor at Semmelweis University in Budapest, a former Fogarty Fellow at Harvard University, is a molecular chaperones specialist. In 2003, he became fascinated by the concept of affinity -- a network's stabilizing components of must have weak links to the other components. These weak links act as hubs. Attack the hubs; disrupt the network. Csermely demonstrates the concept hold true in field after field. The professor begins his study with a discussion of the Granovetter study of a job search and then proceeds to describe network dynamics. By chapter four, the reader is ready to be introduced to the concept of weak links as universal stabilizers. Then, the professor conducts a network tour ranging from macromolecules to the planet earth. Finally he ends with a discussion of weak links, stability landscapes and game theory. Surprisingly, his book is understandable, even to non-academics. It is loaded with gems that can be applied to the reader's networks and relationships. This is not a book I would have ever picked up on my own. Thankfully, Professor Csermely sent me an advanced copy. It is a unique book that takes a thorough look at an intriguing concept.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Weak Links, Nov 29 2007
By G. A. Durant-law "Graham Durant-Law" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Weak Links: The Universal Key to the Stability of Networks and Complex Systems (Hardcover)
I've just finished reading "Weak Links: Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks" by Peter Csermely , who is a Professor of Biochemistry at the Semmelweis University of Budapest. The central theme is weak links are the determinants of system stability and diversity. Csermely defines a link "as 'weak', when its addition or removal does not change the mean value of a target measure at a statistically discernible way" (p. 83). The book is an interesting read if only because its topic matter ranges from network complexity in physical systems, to biological systems, and finally social and cultural systems. Personally I think there are a few longbows drawn, but in fairness Csermely does clearly indicate where he is engaging in speculation. One fascinating discussion was the discourse on pink noise. Pink noise is also known as coloured noise, flicker noise, crackling noise and Barkhausen noise. Seemingly pink noise is present in systems as diverse as solar flares, traffic flows and group decision making, and has a stabilising or relaxing effect. Quoting several scientific sources he postulates that pink noise helps neural synchronisation, which is partly responsible for memory formation. To put it another way if you want to memorise something have Mozart playing in the background rather than bagpipes, because Mozart's music has pink noise properties! Csermeley's discussion on immunological networks is also interesting. He says an immune system has to solve four problems: the self/ non-self recognition problem; the signal to noise problem; the context problem; and the response problem. Now this is interesting because the later three points define the knowledge retrieval problem of a knowledge management system. Apparently weak links are the immune system's mechanism to solve these problems. A software package typically consists of several hierarchical and modular components, which are bound by strong links. Taking a lesson from the immune system perhaps we need to build software with lots of weak links, and ensure our people and process dimensions also have many weak links? Perhaps these weak links will allow the percolation of knowledge through the human, process, and technology systems. Perhaps our real problem with knowledge management is we try to over-engineer everything and in so doing build strong links rather than weak links. I'm beginning to think weak links matter. I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested in networks. Regards, Graham
|
|
|