William Wordsworth and the Ecology of Authorship: The Roo... and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

William Wordsworth and the Ecology of Authorship: The Roots of Environmentalism in Nineteenth-Century Culture Hardcover – Apr 5 2012

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
CDN$ 69.63 CDN$ 100.10

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 304 pages
  • Publisher: Univ of Virginia Pr (April 5 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0813932300
  • ISBN-13: 978-0813932309
  • Product Dimensions: 2.5 x 15.9 x 24.1 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 544 g

Product Description


Scott Hess has written a valuable book that reveals the limits of Romantic ecocriticism by explaining the danger of applying contemporary standards of environmentalism to an author like Wordsworth. Hess reveals that the apparent ecocentrism of many Romantic authors is based on aesthetic and cultural standards of their own era, not on our current land-ethic or an Audubon Society activism.--Ashton Nichols, Dickinson College

About the Author

Scott Hess, Associate Professor of English at Earlham College, is the author of "Authoring the Self: Self-Representation, Authorship, and the Print Market in British Poetry from Pope through Wordsworth."

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 1 review
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Stick with Bate's ROMANTIC ECOLOGY April 7 2013
By Yankee Reader - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Suffice it to say that Wordsworth's "Nature" may not be our "Nature." It's an important point, and Hess makes it right off. But Hess is immediately disappointingly arbitrary in his comparisons and his readings, as pp. 30-32 where he compares "I wandered lonely" to Clare's "Sonnet: The Passing Traveler" to show how narrowly WW frames his poetic landscapes: WW's "I gazed--and gazed" singularizes the point of view because the phrase is repeated, while repetition in the Clare poem pluralizes point of view. WW's dancing daffodils remain objects for Hess, while barely mentioned horse and squirrel provide alternate points of view in Clare. One wonders if Hess's readings aren't "framed" far more tightly than any of Wordsworth's poems. And why not compare Clare's "Traveler" to WW's "Old Man Travelling" in the first place?

If Hess, comfortably ensconced at Earlham, can discern the difference between WW's privileged, narrowly-framed point of view and the broader unprivileged points of view of Clare and Dorothy, couldn't Wordsworth have done the same? It is a matter of notorious fact that he did exactly that, and that he was ridiculed for his "system" of doing so.

I find it difficult to convince myself to read two hundred more pages of an author who has demonstrated in only thirty that he is either an unreliable or an unfair reader. Three stars at least, though, for the contexts, old and new, in which Hess places Wordsworth.