|New from||Used from|
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
"This is by far the best book on investment policy and management." ---Peter Drucker on earlier edition of Winning the Loser's Game --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
A updated edition of Charles Elliss classic book---based on the seminal article that has stood the test of time for more than a quarter century.
All data, figures and charts have been updated
Historical analysis of P-E ratios and what they mean to long run investing
Why the S&P outperforms over 85% of all active fund managers
The paradox of investing
The importance of performance measurement
Techniques to profit from for the long haul
Tactics to build healthy long term portfolios
Why emotion can ruin an investors portfolio --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Index Mutual Funds worked in the high growth era of the 1990's, but have been bad news since. Therefore, the theory that an investor wastes his time by choosing a manager-run... Read morePublished on July 9 2002 by Richard E. Kemmler
This could have been a good book in that the author has some very valid points. However both he and the editors at McGraw-Hill were quite lazy. Read morePublished on Feb. 26 2002
As someone just beginning to read books about finance and investment, I found this book interesting but repetitive. Read morePublished on May 20 2001
I found this book to be very helpful-one of the best financial books I have ever read. The book is written so that someone who has recently begun investing can pick up the... Read morePublished on July 19 2000 by Geoff Wieczynski
It is a rare experience to read a book where you are repeatedly saying "yes, that is it". This made me do it over and over again. Read morePublished on Oct. 13 1999
A wonderful update of a classic! I give this book to all my clients (I am a financial planner) as the foundation for thinking about their portfolio and how they look at... Read morePublished on Oct. 7 1999 by Brown Dog
Learning how to invest successfully is a challenge because there is so much mis-information in the published literature. Read morePublished on Jan. 11 1999