Auto boutiques-francophones Simple and secure cloud storage Personal Care Cook All-New Kindle Paperwhite Music Deals Store Fall Tools
Winstanley and the Diggers, 1649-1999 and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
CDN$ 94.63
Usually ships within 3 to 5 weeks.
Ships from and sold by
Gift-wrap available.
Winstanley and the Digger... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Winstanley and the Diggers, 1649-1999 Paperback – Jun 30 2000

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
CDN$ 94.63
CDN$ 67.41 CDN$ 67.36

Unlimited FREE Two-Day Shipping for Six Months When You Try Amazon Student

Product Details

Product Description


'An ideal introduction to current work on the Diggers, as well as an indispensable collection for serious scholars.' - H-Net

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 1 review
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
A significant scholarly overview Jan. 2 2005
By R. Stikmanz - Published on
Format: Paperback
This volume brings together papers from a Winstanley conference held in 1999 to celebrate the 350th anniversary of the Digger project. The essays are valuable for setting out clearly what can and cannot be known about Gerrard Winstanley, as well as making thoughtful comparisons with figures as diverse as John of Patmos, Milton, Blake and Marx. A couple of the papers expand upon the more general social context in which Winstanley acted. That said, these are conference papers by academic historians; literary gems they are not. Important reading, useful reading? Yes. Inspiring or inspired? Ah, no.