Worlds in Collision and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

World's in Collision Mass Market Paperback – Mar 1 1977


See all 14 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 113.09 CDN$ 7.31

Join Amazon Student in Canada


--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Mass Market Paperback
  • Publisher: Pocket Books (Mm); Reissue edition (March 1977)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0671554646
  • ISBN-13: 978-0671554644
  • Product Dimensions: 17 x 10.4 x 2.5 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 68 g
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (19 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #1,125,657 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Duncan MacLeod on Dec 10 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Immanuel Velikovsky was vilified by the "scientific" community, because he dared give some credence to Biblical accounts and dared to put together historical writing and scientific discoveries -- but most of all because he dared consider the possibility of past catastrophes, when the prevailing orthodox view of geological history was uniformitarian -- a requirement for the theory of evolution.

In subsequent generations, palaeontologists and historical geologists have seen, and acknowledged, incontrovertible evidence of past catastrophes, such as the worldwide one that suddenly killed the dinosaurs. Yet in this same "scientific" community, Velikovsky is still given little if any credence. Of courses, not everything he said has been proven "gospel truth," by any means, but his record is as good or better than many that these people do hold up as great thinkers.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Rick M. Pilotte TOP 1000 REVIEWER on Sept. 25 2008
Format: Paperback
This book reads quite well and he is very genuine and forthright in his manner and appraisals of the evidence. He was clearly someone who had done his homework and showed up a lot of other theorists.
He does however missidentify the wandering planet coming from Jupiter as Venus which unfortunatly no doubt branded him as a crackpot...But kudos for him in even daring such a conclusion based on his research into ancient legends. He got very close to what I suspect is the truth in this area...which is far better than any current day geologists would even dare. But clearly this would void Bode's law which showed that the planets have predetermined orbits. For Venus to have been a new planet would have meant every other planet would have had to jump one orbit outward. He suspected that the red spot on Jupiter may have been a spot where Venus was expulsed by; but it's more likely this was a spot in which the largest chunk of the exploded planet (now the asteroid belt) landed.
His ideas on mutations have also been shown to be in error. But otherwise his information in all three of his major works (including Earth in Upheaval and Ages in Chaos) are great sources of honest appraisals of evidence which often conflicted with agendas held to by other theorists.
He upstages geologists so well that his books provided me with break through clues to the recent past. Geologists, paleontologists, Evolutionists and archeologists all must hate this guy because he unwittingly(?) trashed their pet theories about ancient man and their recorded histories, and the earth's RECORDED cataclysmic past. He presented facts that are still hidden away today because of how they destroy present geologic theories. For example he shows just how wrong glaciation dating theories are.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Aeneas on Jan. 28 2008
Format: Paperback
I sometimes wonder why it is so hard to get books, such as this one and why it is not being reprinted again. This is certainly not a crackpot theory, but a theory that has since found much validation.

Velikovsky back in 1950, when this book was published, proposes that the earth is subject to cometary impact from within the solar system and that these impacts has happened within recorded history. He does an excellent job at showing how impacts that devastated the earth and caused much upheaval has been recorded in many cultures across the planet, from Egypt, South America, Iceland, Mexico, America and many more. It is well documented and one has to admire the work gone into producing this book and getting all the source material to back up the theory, considering that it was written in a time when there was neither internet nor computers. There is much in this book that should be considered seriously, but which has received very little attention from the academic community.

However some have dared to go there and some of what Velikovsky wrote has since been verified. An Astrophysicist Victor Clube wrote in the 1990'ies that the earth goes through cyclical cometary showers and that some major event happens 1 in 4 lifetimes. Likewise other people have built on Velikovsky's work and come out with an interesting cosmological account of the universe, namely the Electric Universe. Still it is on the outskirts of mainstream cosmology and one wonders why as it can potentially add much new understanding.

Another recommended book that deals with the cyclical nature of things and much more is called "The Secret history of the World" by L.Knight-Jadczyk
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Arthur F. McVarish on March 15 2001
Format: Hardcover
WORLDS IN COLLISION is a fascinating, controversial study which posits a cosmic history of planetary cataclysms. According to Immanuel Velikovsky, these epic catastrophes geophysically altered earth, radically affecting even its magnetic polarity and solar orbit. The great MYTHOLOGIES of the world, in particular the story of the Hebrew EXODUS, are cited to substantiate the theory that Venus may have originally been a comet whose near-collision with earth was the Physical Agency (ascribed to God in The Torah/Old Testament)of the terrifying tribulation called THE TEN PALGUES:
Velikovsky provocatively explains from the "bloodying" of the Nile ((ionized dust/ashes; of the ilk a hydrogen bomb explosion would cause)...))to the "Angel of Death's" slaying of Egyptian Firstborns...and billions of others around the world...referring to ancient, now-occult literatures...by poisonous vapors generated by chemical interaction of two very different planetary atmospheres. (According to IV: this terrible night...for the incipient Hebrew Nation, the FIRST PASSOVER...occurred Friday evening on the 13 day of the month. Hence the number 13 is "forever" branded as ominous in our Racial Unconscious!)
WORLDS IN COLLISION abounds in similar essays and stories. The scholarship supporting them is often as astounding. Is it believable? That is: is it Scientifically verifiable? (Is THE BIG BANG? Radical Evolution? Any GUT...Grand Unifying theory?) Is it tenable even? This depends on what readers "ten" (from tenere: to hold-on to; grasp/reach toward comprehension). For any but the most "earth bound" Fox (as Isaiah Berlin might term the disciples of radical scientism) this book is stupendous fun. Who cares if it's "true"?
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Product Images from Customers

Most recent customer reviews

Search


Feedback