Zack 20602 Sugare Straw S... has been added to your Cart
Quantity:1

Zack 20602 Sugare Straw Spoon

by ZACK
2.8 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews

Price: CDN$ 5.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
  • Straw spoon
  • Stainless steel
  • Dishwasher safe
  • easy to clean
  • Brushed finish


Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 22.6 x 2.5 x 2.5 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 9 g
  • Item model number: 20602
  • ASIN: B000S6NZB2
  • Date first available at Amazon.ca: Aug. 23 2012
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #132,850 in Home & Kitchen (See Top 100 in Home & Kitchen)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images or tell us about a lower price?

Product Description

Zack 20602 sugare straw spoon. The perfect way to enjoy your ice cream coupe or any shake. Spoon, sip and enjoy.


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

2.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
Same as the other reviewer, I thought I was getting 4 spoons and only got one, the picture and description is deceiving.
2 of 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Thought I was getting 4 spoons, but got only one:(
2 of 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
The picture deceived me as well. Of what use is one spoon?
1 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
great idea
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse