|
|
4.0 out of 5 stars
Misplaced Emphasis, Mar 3 2002
By A Customer
I certainly don't feel this book is Byatt's best, but I am having a difficult time trying to decide exactly why because, on the surface, at least, it seems both fautless and intellectual.The narrator of The Biographer's Tale, Phineas G. Nanson, is both engaging and believable. He's preening, self-absorbed, sullen, anxiety-ridden and thinks of little else but literature. He even looks the part he plays: he is "very small," but "perfectly formed." This man, who could have so easily grated on one's nerves, becomes, in Byatt's masterful hands, a comic masterpiece who is thoroughly enjoyable. Yet this book, for some reason, so often becomes rather trite and boring. Perhaps it's all the history. Perhaps it's the (sometimes) extreme intellectualism. More likely, it's the theme: that human beings seem incapable of compiling a true history of anything. But I'm really not sure. Phineas Nanson, one fine day, while looking out of a dirty window (in itself a cliche) decides that he wants more out of life than simply being a critic of postmodern literature. He wants instead, a "life full of things." So, he decides, then and there, to write a biography of a biographer, namely, Scholes Destry-Scholes. From this very trite beginning, Byatt goes on to create a story filled with atmosphere and exotic details, just one of the many things at which she excells. Nanson is a first-rate narrator and affords much comic relief as he struggles to write his biography of a biographer. Destry-Scholes seems to be purposely evading Nanson; all he can find of the man is a marble collection, an arcane tool used for drilling holes in the skull, an unfinished manuscript and a collection of note cards used to write said manuscript. It is the note cards that take center stage in this book and it is here that I think Byatt misplaced her emphasis. Byatt is a storyteller of formidable power, yet she chooses to let Phineas' perusal of Destry-Scholes manuscript and note cards make up the bulk of her novel. As Phineas soon discovers, Destry-Scholes' biography is not of one man, but of three: Carl Linnaeus, Francis Galton and Henrik Ibsen. The more Phineas struggles to make sense of Destry-Scholes' note cards and sort them into some kind of order, the more he sees order and objective "truth" are simply an impossibility. We do get the joke, but it simply isn't funny. What is meant to be satire becomes impossibly tired and worn. Surprising, given Byatt's skill. Despite all of this, The Biographer's Tale has its moments. There are obscure historical details, scientific facts, romantic addendums. The book is both intelligent and classy and this adds to my dismay about it, for, although it certainly has its high points, in the long run, it simply isn't all that interesting. Still...it is A.S. Byatt and I really don't think she can do much that is wrong.
|