Most helpful customer reviews
|
|
35 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Well Worth the Effort, Nov 27 2006
Although difficult, this book is an important mediation between the emerging rift between traditional 'objective' knowledge and totally relativistic subjective knowledge. Harraway, a trained Zoologist is well placed to enter into the debates regarding the production of knowledge. Furthermore, contrary to many post-modern thinkers, Deleuze, Lacan, Spivak and Zizek come to mind, Harraway has a real subject which constantly grounds her ideas. She is not just writing about writing, although she does that as well.
Many people get put off by the technical-jargon and invented words in her essay Cyborg Manifesto...most of these people that I have met are guilty of reading that article first since it is usually the one most discussed. Do not go this route. One of the greatest virtues of the book is that it goes from her more focused early work in 81 to her more inventive complicated work 91. If you follow along and read some of the early, some of the mid and some of the later work (or better yet the whole thing) you might be startled to realize that something amazing has happened to your perspectives regarding debates such as Nature vs Nurture, Gene vs Organism, objective vs subjective, they will seem absurd. In what is, I think, one of the best articles of the later half of the twentieth century, Situated Knowledges, later half of the book, Harraway introduces just that situated knoweldge, the importance of understanding the location of the observer in all observation.
Just as Einstien did in his theory of Relativity she points to the utter importance of location for an accurate understanding of knoweldge. In Einstein it was location in spacetime, for harraway it is location in the social world.
Fans of Richard Lewontin may notice an uncanny transferability between her thought and his.
|
|
|
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliant Collection of Essays, Oct 25 2004
Donna Haraway will be remembered historically, if she's remembered at all, as the most misunderstood theorist of the twentieth century. Appealing to individuals used to simplistic rhetoric and discourse, due to her subject matters of feminism and science studies, Haraway uses langugae more apt to the deconstructions of Jacques Derrida. This connection is elided but important in understanding Haraway's project.The essay "Situated Knowledges" offers the clearest construction of her argument, which is, roughly and unjustly on my part, to trouble the subject-object distinction and provide potential postions for ethical research and study. Her brilliance makes her important but also extremely difficult. Why it was used for a sophomore level university class I'm not sure. This book promotes and profits from rereadings--and why else buy a book?
|
|
|
0 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Book Club 3, April 7 2003
By A Customer
Rur Soc 248 3/30/03 Book Club # 3Simians, Cyborgs, and Women written by Donna J. Haraway is a compilation of ten essays from 1978 through 1989 that focus on the idea that nature is constructed, not discovered, and truth is made, not found. Donna J. Haraway is a science historian and Professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She explains her ideas in this book through a strong feminist viewpoint. Haraway divides her book into three sections, each section addressing different topics. The first section of the book discusses feminist struggles of developing knowledge and behavior in the social lives of monkeys and apes. The second part of the book discusses contests for the power to determine stories about nature and experience. The last part of the book discusses the cyborg embodiment and the fate of feminist concepts of gender, feminist ethics and even discusses the immune system as a biopolitical map of the chief system of difference in a postmodern world. My opinions on this book are very one sided. I did not enjoy reading it at all. I thought that the book was very difficult to read. The book had a great deal of words in it that I have never seen before. I found myself constantly looking to a dictionary just so I could get the message behind what Haraway was trying to relay. One of the other reasons that the book was difficult to read was because it talked about many theories and ideas that I have never heard about before. This would have not been a big issue if the theories had explained more before they were used in proving Haraway's arguments. A direct example of this is when Haraway uses the theories that Zuckerman and Rowell have about reproduction. There was one part of the book that I thought was fairly interesting and that was Haraway's idea, that people in today's modern world are cyborgs because we incorporate so much technology into our lives. I thought that that idea was a very clever way to describe our highly technical world. I went into reading this book with an open mind and I left the book with an open mind. Even though I did not enjoy reading this book and I thought it was very boring after reading it I am now more aware about how different people think and their point of view and that is always a valuable thing to take away from an experience.
|
|
|
Most recent customer reviews
|