Most helpful customer reviews
|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
If you like men who treat women like children...., July 7 2002
If you like men that treat women like children, incapable of taking care of themselves, or even making decisions for themselves, you'll like the Carpathians. Oh, occasionally the men will attempt to let the women do what they want, if doing otherwise would make them too unhappy... but these women don't seem to mind too much that they're being controlled, so the unhappiness part doesn't seem to be much of a trump card.I've read the first two books of the series so far, and although I can say the writing is decent, the concept interesting... (which is why I gave it 2 stars rather than 1) the men and the Carpathian society are just Not a turn on for a woman who has respect for herself. The writer throws a little bit of seeming 'rebellion' in, from the women who are 'lifemated' to the men - often unknowingly, btw, as the men can 'marry/lifemate' the women without their knowing, or perhaps even willing, participation in the act. But the 'rebellion' of the women doesn't get them far, and they either change their minds or the men ignore it. The Carpathian men claim their most basic instincts are to 'protect' the women, but the protect them like children, not like their equal partners. If the women don't want to do something that the men think would be good for them, they are usually forced to do it anyway with the mind powers of the men. All in all I'm disappointed. It's a decent concept, but it plays on the stereotype that all women really want is a man to take them over and take care of them, so long as he 'loves' them, it's all right. I'm disappointed that authors are still writing women and men this way, and that many readers prefer it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
After reading the first book, Nov 1 2007
the only character that really jumped out at me that I wanted to read about was Gregori. I bought this sequel, in the hopes that this was who it was about. Let me tell you, it didn't matter. Shea and Jacques were great! The story line kept you deeply involved and thinking about what was going to happen the whole time. Even though you don't hear much about them in the first book, you really get involved with them in this one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 out of 5 stars
maybe Feehan isn't so bad after all..., Jun 20 2004
I've only read one of Feehan's books before, _Dark Magic_, and I didn't really like it. The hero, Gregori, was domineering to a fault, the heroine was a bit of an idiot, and the writing was repetitive. In spite of my feelings about that book, I decided to try Feehan's immensely popular series again. This time, I somehow managed to pick a book a little more to my tastes. In this book, Shea O'Halloran, a young doctor, has been having dreams about a man in terrible pain. She goes to the Carpathian Mountains, the land of her birth, in order to escape men who seem to believe that she is a vampire. While there, Shea finds the man from her dreams, who at first attacks her out of a mistaken belief that she is the cause of his pain. Shea tries to heal this man, Jacques, and, in spite of herself, she begins to fall in love with him. Jacques believes that she is his lifemate, the only one who can keep the madness within him at bay. He would stop at nothing to protect her from the men who want to hurt her and the vampire who wants to claim her as his own, the same vampire who betrayed him (Jacques). For those of you familiar with the series, this book also has Mikhail, Raven, Gregori, and Byron (who I'm including in this list, although I'm not sure if he's ever in another book).Because of my previous experience with this series, I was a little wary about reading this book, but, for me, this book was a whole lot better than _Dark Magic_. Jacques is domineering, yes, but Shea can, for the most part, hold her own against him, since his will often seems to turn to putty around her. I really enjoyed the story itself, even though the human villain characters were once again like cardboard cutouts of Badness. The writing seemed less repetitive than in _Dark Magic_, where references to the main characters often involved the use of the same words, over and over again. Shea was in some serious denial, though - it seemed like it took her forever to realize that Jacques was not just a man with a serious blood disorder, even though he drank glasses of blood and survived for years with a stake through his chest. Still, this book was pretty enjoyable, and I think I'll try to find more books in this series that I can like as much, or more, than this one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most recent customer reviews
|