Most helpful customer reviews
|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Intense, powerful, and a ripping good read! A true classic!, Feb 7 2004
"Seven Days in May" is an authentic classic political thriller of the first rank. Authors Baily and Knebel present a scenario in which an unpopular President is targeted by America's top military brass for an actual military takeover of the government. The story is complex, but vividly presented with an authenticity that is both disturbing and plausible. The reader is brought to understand that it could happen here, and the story suggests how such a scenario could come about in these United States.The novel is well-written and fast-paced, never drags, and absolutely holds the reader's interest throughout. The amazing thing about the story is that every bit of it hangs together without straining the reader's sense of credulity. The novel features excellent writing, and the authors weave the plot together towards a conclusion that is startling and believable (no spoiler here). This was a big budget movie in the 1960s featuring Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster (available on DVD) and I would very much like to see a reprint of the novel become available, as my often-read paperback copy has long since fallen to pieces from frequent readings.
|
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Excellent Political Thriller, Jun 18 2003
SEVEN DAYS IN MAY by Fletcher Knebel and Charles Bailey is a frightening look at what most people would consider impossible in the government established by our Constitution. Most Americans take our democratic form of government for granted; but could a military leader manage to engineer a coup to overthrow the Executive Branch of government? This is the central issue in this novel set sometime around a decade after Kennedy's administration (the book was written in 1962), as an unpopular President Lyman faces unrest in both in the armed forces and the civilian sector over a proposed disarmament treaty with the Soviet Union, labor troubles at home, and a poor economy. Colonel Martin Casey, reporting to the Chairman of the Join Chiefs of Staff, suspects something is up when a series of suspicious events and circumstances occur, which lead him to conclude that JSC Chairman General Scott is readying a coup. With only days before the potential coup, President Lyman, and his trusted allies Colonel Cassey, Secretary of Treasury Todd, Senator Clark from Georgia, the President's Appointment Secretary Girard and Secret Service Agent Corwin, must act quickly to try to corroborate or disprove the theory of a military coup. The investigation includes a kidnapping of one of the President's men at a secret military base, a suspicious death that rattles the President, the use of sexual innuendo for information, and more. The picture this novel paints is a frightening one. The book is not a difficult one to read or comprehend. In the end, you're left wondering if it could possibly happen today. The book is set up as a chronological account of the actions of the Presidents team over the seven days until the coup; the pressure of time is constantly felt through the novel, which just adds to the suspense. Although over 300 pages, the book starts up quick and never stops. SEVEN DAYS IN MAY is an excellent political thriller that entertains and makes you wonder. Once you pick it up you'll find it difficult to put down. I highly recommend.
|
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Very American Coup, Jan 9 1998
By A Customer
At the height of the Cold War, an American President more concerned with conscience than popularity, negotiates a disarmament treaty with the Soviet Union. His approval rating plummets. But what is worse, his actions convince the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Air Force General James Mattoon Scott, that the President has become a danger to national security and must be stopped. Marine Col. "Jiggs" Casey, Director of the Joint Chiefs, discovers the plot, and it is up to him and a handful of others to prevent the unthinkable: a military coup to overthrow the US Government. This book is magnificently written and -- as evidenced by its second screen adaptation in 1994 -- is just as relevant today as it was 34 years ago. A cautionary tale for anyone who assumes American democracy immune to palace revolution.
|
|
|
|