Would you like to see this page in English? Click here.


Vous en avez un à vendre? Vendez les vôtres ici
 
 
When We Were Orphans
 
Agrandissez cette image
 

When We Were Orphans (Hardcover)


3.3étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (128 évaluations de client)

Offert par ces vendeurs.


5 d'occasion à partir de CDN$ 8.88

Les clients qui ont acheté cet article ont aussi acheté


Les détails du produit


Mots-clés inspirés de produits similaires

 (De quoi s'agit-il ?)
Soyez le premier à ajouter un mot-clé pertinent (fortement associé à ce produit)
 

Vos mots-clés : Ajouter votre premier mot-clé
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

When We Were Orphans
74% buy the item featured on this page:
When We Were Orphans 3.3étoiles sur 5 (128)
Never Let Me Go
9% buy
Never Let Me Go 4.2étoiles sur 5 (25)
CDN$ 15.33
The White Tiger: A Novel
8% buy
The White Tiger: A Novel 4.3étoiles sur 5 (18)
CDN$ 14.43
Nocturnes: Five Stories of Music and Nightfall
6% buy
Nocturnes: Five Stories of Music and Nightfall 4.0étoiles sur 5 (1)
CDN$ 18.77

 

L'avis des consommateurs

128 évaluations
5 étoiles:
 (28)
4 étoiles:
 (36)
3 étoiles:
 (23)
2 étoiles:
 (31)
1 étoiles:
 (10)
 
 
 
 
 
Évaluation du client type
3.3étoiles sur 5 (128 évaluations de client)
 
 
 
 
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients:
Commentaires client les plus utiles

 
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile :
2.0étoiles sur 5 Slow, overhyped, and unbelievable, Avril 26 2002
Par Un client
I just finished reading Kazuo Ishiguro's When We Were Orphans. It was well written. The dialogue and descriptions of people and places were excellent. The ending was shocking, surprising, and fast-paced. That being said, I regret that I bought it and would not recommend it to anyone else.

The plot was thin, perhaps because it was stretched over too long a book. Until the last tape the pace was too slow for a mystery. A few leaps backward and forward in time are acceptable but he made so many it became a bit difficult to follow the story line. Worse, he sometimes jumped from "A" to "C" in situations without going through "B," or even referring to it in "C" so we knew how he got to "C." An example of this was his acceptance of, and seeming agreement with, the assumption of the city councilman, his old schoolmate Morgan, and the Chinese family in his old home, that Christopher's parents were not only alive but still being held prisoner in Shanghi. We were not told about anything Christopher had discovered either in London or after arriving in Shanghi that would have justified that assumption.

In fact, we were not told about anything he had discovered in England that would indicate he had reason to believe his parents were still in Shanghi or even still alive. Yet there is an implication that he had discovered something, some lead or information that might make a trip to Shanghi worthwhile.

The great buzz that his arrival in Shanghi created and his VIP treatment was not believable. Even if he were a British detective of Sherlock Holmes' stature there would not be any reason for people living in Shanghi to be so impressed by him or to be so interested in his case---especially since the case was a personal one involving his parents. With the civil war raging around them and the Japanese invaders possibly about to seize Shanghi it was ridiculous to have some of the residents saying that they thought he could help with that situation.

A couple incidents of chance meetings would be believable because they do happen in real life. However, there are more than a lifetime of lucky chance meetings in this book. Finding the old Chinese detective through Morgan's recollection of him as a street bum, finding his childhood Japanese friend as a wounded Japanese soldier who will again act out the rescue of Christopher's parents, and finding the house of the old blind man through the driver Sara provided were all a bit too much. That last one especially because the driver was described as young, maybe even 15 years old, but he remembered the old blind actor from decades before and even knew where he lived. Unbelievable.

Also, the 1916 kidnapping incident he asked the former Chinese detective about (to locate the house where his parents might be held) would have been long before his parents were kidnapped. The probability that they were held in the same house from the time they were kidnapped until Christopher was a grown man with an international reputation (several decades?) was too small to make that whole part of his quest a logical course of action.

Even before he met them, the Chinese family living in his old home had apparently accepted that they would have to give it to because it had been his family home, even though the British company rather than his family owned it. Not believable.

This man who derided the foreigners in China for the way they treated the Chinese (They had no sense of shame about it.) berated and browbeat his Chinese driver and the Chinese lieutenant, both of whom risked their lives to help him find the house he wanted to locate. That destroyed much of my sympathy for him.

The Chinese lieutenant would not be likely to know about or care about Christopher's case and would be extremely unlikely to desert his post to lead Christopher to a house near or even behind the Japanese lines. Similarly, although he was supposed to be dedicated to finding his parents, Christopher quickly decided to run off with to Macau with another man's wife (shame?) but then just as quickly abandoned her at the waterfront (more shame?), along with the possessions he had selected as important enough to fit in the one suitcase she allowed him, so he could run off to find the house where he though his parents were still prisoners after several decades.

Having found the house he had risked his life, and the lives of others, to find, the great detective then spent time examining a wounded dog rather than quickly searching the house for his parents. There certainly are such dysfunctional people in real life but there are an unbelievable number of them in this book.

The warlord, Wang Po, was described as having taken Christopher's mother away "in the dead of the night." But we were previously told that she was kidnapped while Uncle Philip took him to the market during the day. How did Christopher learn about "Diana Roberts," the European woman who was being held in a missionary home for the aged in Hong Kong?

Did anybody edit this book? Did anybody check it for plot continuity and agreement?

Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles  
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non


 
4.0étoiles sur 5 It's The Way He Tells 'Em..., Avril 14 2007
Par Craobh Rua "Craobh Rua" (N. Ireland) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
This review is from: When We Were Orphans (Paperback)
Kazuo Ishiguro was born in Nagasaki in 1954 and moved to Britain at the age of five. He was awarded the OBE in 1995 and the Chevalier de l'Ordre des Arts et des Lettres in 1998. "When We Were Orphans" is his fifth novel, was first published in 2000 and was shortlisted for that year's Booker Prize.

The story is set in the 1930s and is told by Christopher Banks. Born and raised in Shanghai until the age of nine - when, within a few weeks of each other, both his parents disappeared - Banks then moved to England, to be raised by an aunt. Now grown up and based in London, Christopher is based in London and working as a high profile and very successful private detective. His celebrity has eased his way into fashionable London society, though some - such as Sarah Hemmings - are initially a little resistant to his appeal. Fashionable society, however, isn't Christopher's main concen : although it's been many years since his parents disappeared, the case is still (apparently) open and unsolved. Christopher has taken it upon himself to complete the investigation - "When We Were Orphans" sees him not only move forward with the case, but also look back on his childhood memories of Shanghai. Obviously, his parents feature prominently in these memories - but his friendship with a Japanese boy called Akira was also very important to him. As the book goes on, however, it becomes clear - though unfortunately not to Banks himself - just how unreliable his memories are. Ultimately, the investigation leads to his return to Shanghai - where he hopes to close the case. The trouble, of course, is that while his investigation may uncover the truth, the truth may not be quite what he is expecting...

While I wouldn't say "When We Were Orphans" is entirely flawless, the flaws are only very few and far between. The details on how Christopher conducted his investigation were a little scant - but, as the book wasn't written as a thriller, that's pretty easy to brush off. The style of writing was also occasionally a little formal - there's a few chaps and fellows here and there, what ho. However, given that the story was being told by a Cambridge graduate in the 1930s...somehow, to me, the language added a touch of authenticity. There were one or two questions left unanswered - particularly in relation to Akira. (I'd have given anything to find out what happened to him after Christopher left Shanghai). Overall, though, I'd absolutely recommend this book - very readable, and one that I just couldn't put down.
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles  
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non


 
4.0étoiles sur 5 Betwix and between, Juil 23 2006
Par Ian Gordon Malcomson (Smithers, Canada) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(TOP 50 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
This review is from: When We Were Orphans (Paperback)
If the reader is still looking for a nice coherent plot from an Ishiguro novel, lots of luck. It just isn't going to happen. Get use to Ishiguro's solitary characters operating within an existential vacuum called time. This literary device leads to all kinds of half-formed, tentative relationships, where the likes of Sara, Akiri, and Christopher never really get to know the essence of the other person in their respective lives. Everybody of importance in this novel has his or her own mission to pursuit and, if something so happens to accidently distil from a brief encounter, it only succeeds in deepening - not solving - the mystery of life as to who we really are. A good read for someone who does not come to fiction with a preconceived notion that life is a nicely packaged array of events and stock personalities.
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles  
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non

Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients: Créer votre propre commentaire
 
 
Commentaires client les plus récents

5.0étoiles sur 5 It's all about psychology and memory
Christopher Banks is an unusual detective in Kazuo Ishiguro¡s latest novel, When We Were Orphans. The story is not about Banks¡s investigation of a shrewdly planned murder or a... Read more
Publié le Jui 8 2002 par eric_mok

2.0étoiles sur 5 Uncompelling excersize in frustration
I have read all of Ishiguro's previous novels including the painfully frustrating Unconsoled. The first two-thirds of Orphans raised my hopes that Ishiguro had returned to... Read more
Publié le Jui 2 2002 par D. Fay

5.0étoiles sur 5 Masterpiece of aberrant reality
A brief look at the available reviews shows that middle opinions are rare. You either have the taste for Ishiguro's works after "The Remains of The Day" or you don't. Read more
Publié le Mai 4 2002 par missir

2.0étoiles sur 5 Confusing style
There are several interpretations of this book.

As a mystery this is very disappointing because we are never given enough information to understand why Christopher comes to... Read more

Publié le Mai 1 2002

1.0étoiles sur 5 What's Ishiguro up to?
I admit that I have not yet finished the book, and so perhaps should reserve judgement, but I won't. Read more
Publié le Avril 27 2002 par andy barrett

5.0étoiles sur 5 I love this book.
I love this book. Will you? It's hard to say. If you are concerned with question of one's responsibility towards global justice, toward those who are close to us, to ourselves,... Read more
Publié le Avril 25 2002

5.0étoiles sur 5 As Good As Remains of the Day
There seems to be quite a few reviewers who prefer Remains of the Day over When We Were Orphans. I don't quite understand this preference since there are obvious parallels... Read more
Publié le Avril 17 2002

2.0étoiles sur 5 quite Boring
I had to plow through this book, which made no real sense after a while. It was soo boring. Full of nonsence information. Read more
Publié le Avril 15 2002 par Eleonora Subak

1.0étoiles sur 5 yuck. famous author writes like a high schooler
Oh how I hated this book. Sometimes I give up on a book when it is written poorly or with poor story craftsmanship. Read more
Publié le Avril 12 2002 par Nicholas R. Gibson

2.0étoiles sur 5 Absurd...
It left me annoyed with so many unanswered questions:

Why would any sane person think for a minute his parents were still alive, after having disappeared over 30 years earlier... Read more

Publié le Avril 9 2002

Rechercher uniquement sur les commentaires portant sur ce produit



Listmania!


Cherchez des articles semblables par catégorie


Commentaires

Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?

Votre historique récent

 (En savoir plus)

Après avoir visualisé des pages détaillées produit ou des résultats de recherche, regardez ici pour trouver une façon simple de poursuivre votre navigation sur des pages qui vous intéressent.