Most helpful customer reviews
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
knowing about Islam DOES help a lot..., April 11 2002
By A Customer
Even if you don't know anything about Islam, the book is still beautiful and entertaining and you'll get a lot out of it. But don't believe the people who say that you don't need to know anything beyond who Muhammad is to understand it completely. I read the book right before I started a class on Islam, and I understood a lot of the main messages. After I took the class, though, so many things started to make more sense. For example, Rushdie renames Mecca "Jahilia", which in Islam refers to the 'age of pagan ignorance'. (So he's calling the most holy city a place of ignorance...) That's just a tiny example; most of them are a lot more detailed. There are so many incredibly complex things that are going on in this book, that you simply can't understand it all if you don't know anything about Islam. I would still encourage anyone to read it though. Maybe it'll spark an interest to learn more about the religion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
a WONDERFUL book, May 19 2002
This book is incredible. Rushdie has a unique, lyrical prose style that makes this book a joy to read. The Satanic Verses deals with two men who fall from a hijacked airpane and survive. After the fall, (hmm) they undergo a series of transformations: one man, Gibreel Farishta, is changed into an archangel, while Saladin Chamcha changes into a demon. The story also deals with immigration: the loss of one's homeland and the mistreatment and bigotry with which immigrants are treated. Beyond that, Rushdie is dealing with the intertwined nature of good and evil. Where the book has been accused of blasphemy are the passages in which he opposes the black/white polarization of good and evil in organized religion. I would not recommend this book to a devout Muslim, Catholic, or any unquestioned believer in any dogmatic religion. It questions many beliefs about God and about life. However, I do not feel Rushdie is an atheist, only a believer who does not want to be told what to think. This book is a great masterpiece, second only in Rushdie's catalogue to Midnight's Children. (Well, I haven't read Ground Beneath her Feet yet, but MC is the best I've read so far.) I highly recommend this book and Salman Rushdie. I would read Midnight's Children first if you're a Rushdie newbie.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
Worthwhile, Dec 31 2006
THE SATANIC VERSES is a great humanistic book. This, along with Franzen's THE CORRECTIONS made up my great reading for the past year. The message I got from the book is that good and evil are simply two attributes of the same human essence as opposed to being the workings of special agents (angels and devils). Angels, devils, revelations, inspirations are all devices of the rich human imagination. Thoughts belong wholly to the thinker, and the actions belong wholly to the doer.
This message is not of course novel. Rushdie's deliverance, however, is ingenious. The two protagonists, two adult males, fall from the sky after a plane accident. The traumatic incident gives Rushdie the justification to set his heroes on a journey where the reader is led to review the concepts of good and evil through the eyes and minds of the two characters. Both characters are Indian.
But I do believe their plight is pretty universal. Salahuddin Chamcha is a man at odds with his father and with his country culture for reasons that we come to recognize as believable and human and real. Gibreel Farishta, on the other hand, is living a surreal life as an Indian movie icon, depicting on the screen all sorts of religious figures in the wide spiritual spectrum found in India. After the incident, Chamcha found himself being transformed to a devil, while Gibreel turned to an angel. Their experiences and later transformations and the stories given through their minds are then used potently by Rushdie to deliver his humanistic message.
I picked from THE SATANIC VERSES another subtle idea in what i believe to be Rushdie's spiritual world view. While we are told that revealed religions and inspired ideas are in fact only the brain children of their "prophets", we are also told that they are not without any use. They provide a powerful mental and spiritual support, albeit imaginary, at moments of extreme human vulnerability, e.g. when dying. Chamcha's father, born Muslim and disillusioned adult, did not mention God on his deathbed (in popular Islamis belief, a dying person is strongly advised to profess his belief in God and the prophet as the ultimate sign of faith. failing to do so may deprive the dying one from after-world blessings).
At the death instant, Chamcha sees his father with signs of terror on his face, and we wonder: Has Rushdie finally conceded to the "inspired idea". However at the last moment, Chamcha's father dies with a smile on his face. So it seems the long-programmed beliefs in after-life blessings and heaven finally produced a pleasant image that carried the old believer through an otherwise painful and terrifying experience. The same happened in the story of the "butterfly prophet" dreamt by Gibreel.
And so Rushdie's message in the final analysis centers on the potency of human ideas.
These ideas, which we sometimes choose to call revelations or visions or inspirations, are *the* true source of evil and of good and of misery and of happiness. Rushdie's spiritual landscape does not necessarily exclude the idea of God, but it also does not seek to confirm it. Believe what you want about the origin of Cosmos, Rushdie seems to say, but always assume full responsibility for your ideas and actions. And don't take your beliefs too seriously lest you find on your hands a pretext for violence.
So what's with Rushdie and Muslims. I am a Muslim. I definitely understand that some of Rushdie's imagery can be very shocking to a traditional Muslim, especially that he uses Islam and Mohammed to illustrate his idea that revealed religions are not revealed at all. I, however, despise the death fatwa. the idea of silencing an idea with violence is repulsive to me. It is only an indication of intellectual weakness and cowardice. I found the book very interesting and thought provoking. And I will always appreciate a book that so tickles my mind. Must also highly recommend Franzen's THE CORRECTIONS, for if you haven't read it, you need to!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most recent customer reviews
|