Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

2 used from CDN$ 68.65

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Everything and More
 
 

Everything and More (Paperback)

by David Foster Wallace (Author) "Unfortunately this is a Foreword you actually have to read-and first-in order to understand certain structural idiosyncrasies and bits of what almost look like code..." (more)
2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (31 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


2 used from CDN$ 68.65

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

From Amazon.com

Before discussing the merits of David Foster Wallace's Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity, it is essential to define what the book is not. This volume in the "Great Discoveries" series is not a history of the personalities and social conditions that led to the "discovery" of infinity. Nor is it a narrative fixated on the cultish fear of--and obsession with--the infinite that has seemingly driven mathematicians insane over the centuries. Rather, Everything and More is a surprisingly rigorous march through the 2000 plus years of mathematical research that began with Aristotle; continued through Galileo, Isaac Newton, G.W. Leibniz, Karl Weierstrass, and J.W.R. Dedekind; and culminated in Georg Cantor and his Set Theory. The task Wallace (author of the bestseller Infinite Jest and other fiction) has set himself is enormously challenging: without radically compromising the complexity of the philosophy, metaphysics, or mathematics that underlies the evolving concept of infinity, present the material to a lay audience in a manner that is entertaining. To propel his narrative, Wallace even develops a style that mirrors the mathematical language he probes. One difficulty in his focus on concepts and not a strict human chronology, though, is that his structure is dependent on frequent digressions (especially early on). Patience is required. Wallace demands that his reader walk through the equations, study the graphs and charts, and relearn college-level concepts to follow along on the exploration. Indeed, after one wrenching dip into Zeno’s paradoxes, Wallace spouts at his imagined complaining audience: "Deal." But the book should be deemed a success. If one grants him the attention he requires, Wallace has made the trip richly rewarding. --Patrick O’Kelley --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

From Publishers Weekly

The subject of infinity would probably strike most readers familiar with Wallace as perfectly suited to his recursive style, and this book is as weird and wonderful as you'd expect. There are footnotes galore, frequently prefaced by the acronym IYI ("If You're Interested"), which can signal either pure digression or the first hint of an idea more fully developed in later chapters. Among other textual idiosyncrasies is the constant use of the lemniscate instead of the word "infinity," emphasizing that this is "not just an incredibly, unbelievably enormous number" but an abstraction beyond what we normally conceive of when we contemplate numbers. Abstraction is one of Wallace's main themes, particularly how the mathematics of infinity goes squarely against our instinct to avoid abstract thought. The ancient Greeks couldn't handle infinity, he points out, because they loathed abstraction. Later mathematicians fared better, and though the emphasis is on Georg Cantor, all the milestones are treated in turn. Wallace appreciates that infinity can be a "skullclutcher," and though the book isn't exactly easy going, he guides readers through the math gently, including emergency glossaries when necessary. He has an obvious enthusiasm for the subject, inspired by a high school teacher whose presence is felt at irregular intervals. Had he not pursued a career in literary fiction, it's not difficult to imagine Wallace as a historian of science, producing quirky and challenging volumes such as this every few years.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
Unfortunately this is a Foreword you actually have to read-and first-in order to understand certain structural idiosyncrasies and bits of what almost look like code in the main text. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What do customers ultimately buy after viewing this item?


 

Customer Reviews

31 Reviews
5 star:
 (7)
4 star:
 (5)
3 star:
 (4)
2 star:
 (4)
1 star:
 (11)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.8 out of 5 stars (31 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

 
3.0 out of 5 stars Good, but flawed, Jun 18 2004
By O. Lytvyn (NJ, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Good subject, interesting (although sometimes tangled) presentation.

But the mathematical mistakes just spoil everything. Like the proof of dichotomy convergence using Weierstrass delta-epsilon thing for continuity. What was that? Looked like the author himself didn't quite understand what he was trying to do, so he just crumpled the proof: "Hence... Hence...".

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
1.0 out of 5 stars A fellow of infinite jest?, April 24 2004
By George Riley (Worcester, MA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I found this a well-researched book by a knowledgeable author, marred only by his putting it into words. The presentation is perhaps that of an overdue term paper at three a.m., when the un-numbered pages have collapsed into a pile on the floor.

The arrogant mannerisms, cliches and hackneyed phrases, ideosyncratic abbreviations, and lack of linear structure make it a book that, once you put it down, is hard to pick up again.

I bought this book hoping to bring away from it some fresh perspectives on infinity, to benefit the calculus students I am teaching. I left it empty-handed.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
2.0 out of 5 stars Paradoxically flawed, April 19 2004
By Charles Meyerson (Chicago area, Illinois) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Inspired by praise for David Foster Wallace's "Everything and More" in publications including The Onion and Wired, I bought it hoping to revive in myself and instill in my kids an enduring excitement about mathematics.

Wallace begins with a series of anecdotes that promised to fill the bill, leavened with plain talk and a bracing occasional bit of scatology. But the book's reliance on advanced notation -- much of it impenetrable even to this reader, despite four years of college math (up to differential equations!) -- soon kills the narrative flow.

Wallace's parenthetical asides and copious footnotes sometimes provide illumination, but the book's scattershot structure belies the dust jacket's promise of "a literary masterpiece."

Even Wallace himself acknowledges the book's shortcomings, apologizing at several points for convoluted sentences, bewildering explanations and jumbled storytelling. A good editor could have helped him cut those knots, isolating the advanced math or otherwise rendering it intelligible, allowing him to deliver what author James Gleick hails in his promotional blurb as "exquisitely (and hilariously) original science writing." (Did Gleick and the other reviewers survive the entire book? Or did they just get the funny parts?)

Reading "Everything and More" was like being trapped in a literary version of Zeno's Paradox: Finishing half the book, then struggling to complete half of what remained, then half of that ... I finally just gave up, disillusioned.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most recent customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity
Wallace's writing about math isn't new-his novel Infinite Jest (1996) and some of his essays include a more than superficial treatment of the subject. Read more
Published on April 15 2004 by B. Viberg

4.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating and approachable
The topic matter at hand here -- infinity -- is very subtle. The book is appropriately detailed, at times hilarious, and very colorful. Read more
Published on Feb 28 2004 by Daniel T. Hauber

1.0 out of 5 stars awful, awful, awful
The author's worst tendencies are on display here. He takes a simple, elegant subject and reduces it to a disorganized mess. Read more
Published on Feb 20 2004 by daveklein222

1.0 out of 5 stars The Truth Comes Out
I was always perplexed by the rave reviews for mediocre books, but I recently read in THE NEW YORK TIMES that the author's friends have been writing them in order to help sell the... Read more
Published on Feb 20 2004

1.0 out of 5 stars The Great Divide: Wallace and the Pomo Elite Fall
I have tried to read this book for three months now, but I am interrupted whenever I throw it across the room. Read more
Published on Feb 14 2004 by jeffkatz5

5.0 out of 5 stars I'm loving It
So the purpose of the Great Discoveries series is to "[bring] together renowned writers from diverse backgrounds to tell the stories of crucial scientific... Read more
Published on Jan 28 2004 by lastbubble

5.0 out of 5 stars A Little Look at Infinity
Have you thought about infinity recently? If so, it was possibly bound up in religious ideas, in some of which it is integral ("Where will YOU spend eternity? Read more
Published on Jan 27 2004 by R. Hardy

2.0 out of 5 stars Great start. Please fix this book.
Hi, I'm a set theorist. This book is ambitious. For many pages and sections, I really wanted to give it a lot of stars just for effort. Read more
Published on Jan 25 2004 by cgus

4.0 out of 5 stars "Unwrapping" Infinity
David Wallace's style evidently had a large effect on the reviews here. To get some feel for the style, you might imagine that you're in a Boston bar where Matt Damon's character... Read more
Published on Jan 21 2004 by William O. Schwennicke

2.0 out of 5 stars Not for me...
This books seems at the same time too difficult and too simple. Speaking as someone with a graduate degree in Chemistry who took more than my share of Math(3 semester Calc, Diff... Read more
Published on Jan 20 2004 by J. L. Brown

Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject





i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.