Would you like to see this page in English? Click here.

15 neufs & d'occasion à partir de CDN$ 2.86

Vous en avez un à vendre?
Vendez les vôtres ici
 
 
Lancelot Du Lethe
 
 

Lancelot Du Lethe (Hardcover)

de J. R KING (Author) "It wasn't a blessing, but a curse," King Ban told himself ..." En savoir plus
4.2étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (4 évaluations de client)

Offert par ces vendeurs.


4 neufs à partir de CDN$ 33.95 11 d'occasion à partir de CDN$ 2.86

Les détails du produit


Descriptions du produit

From Publishers Weekly

Sir Thomas Malory meets Marion Zimmer Bradley head on in this unfocused retelling of the Arthurian legends. King began his version of the tales in Mad Merlin (2000); here, amid much gratuitous bloodletting, he finishes the job. As the title indicates, the book adopts the perspective of Lancelot, Camelot's greatest knight. Son to the king of Benwick, he loses parents and kingdom while still a child, and is reared by an "Aunt Brigid" of Avalon. Lancelot's capture by the Four Queens, his rescue of Guinevere from Meleagaunce and other familiar adventures are intermixed with a mishmash of Roman, Celtic and Christian mythology, loosely glued together by a paramysticism reminiscent of Bradley's The Mists of Avalon. Malory's and Bradley's works brilliantly exhibit their respective visions. Sadly, King's vision is less clear. In attempting to draw on Malory's heroic chivalry and Bradley's revisionist mysticism, he seeks the best of both worlds and ultimately achieves neither. King's flashes of brilliance, frequently found in his descriptions of natural images, don't compensate for a choppy, movie-influenced style that renders even potentially stirring scenes in laundry-list prose. Furthermore, too much of the book is devoted to a convoluted justification for Lancelot and Guinevere's betrayal of an unsympathetic King Arthur. Lovers of "The Matter of Britain" would do better to turn to King's sources rather than his results.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.



From Library Journal

Destined at birth to be Camelot's greatest knight and its deadliest foe, the child known as Lancelot grows up on the Isle of Avalon, unknowing of his fate. The author of Mad Merlin continues his fresh approach to the Arthurian legend with a story of timeless love in a mythical world touched by magic and the land of the fey. King's talent for vivid descriptions and deft characterization makes this saga of the legendary knight and his ill-fated love affair seem new. Recommended for most fantasy collections.
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Dans ce livre (les détails)
First Sentence
It wasn't a blessing, but a curse," King Ban told himself. Lire la première page
En découvrir plus
Concordance
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Plat recto | Droit d'auteur | Extrait | Plat verso
Cherchez à l'intérieur de ce livre:

Associer des mots-clés à ce produit

 (De quoi s'agit-il ?)
Considérez votre mot-clé comme une sorte d'étiquette définissant parfaitement ce produit.
Les mots-clés aident les clients à organiser et trouver leurs articles favoris.
Vos mots-clés : Ajouter votre premier mot-clé
 

 

L'avis des consommateurs

4 évaluations
5 étoiles:
 (2)
4 étoiles:
 (1)
3 étoiles:
 (1)
2 étoiles:    (0)
1 étoiles:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Évaluation du client type
4.2étoiles sur 5 (4 évaluations de client)
 
 
 
 
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients:
Commentaires client les plus utiles

 
3.0étoiles sur 5 Fantasy galore, Déc 7 2003
Par S. E. Kennedy "ocinnedeagh" (Minnesota, United States) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(REAL NAME)   
As a lover of Arthurian ledgend, I snatched up Lancelot Du Lethe eager to explore the story from Lancelot's point of view. While I found the book an easy and interesting read, I also found it about 50 pages too long. I could easily have enjoyed the story with a few less descriptions of the pixies and gnomes and other woodland creatures of fantasy. They were distracting to the excitement of the story and added a childish twist that was at the very least unnecessary and at the very most - insulting. I knew King's work - having first read Le Morte D'Avalon and knew his propensity toward magic so I should have been forewarned. If you do not appreciate an abundance of spells, time warps and impossible underwater travel - this is not the book for you. With any Arthurian legend there will be some aspect of myth- but King really knocks it out of the park. I wondered if he didn't delve deeply into the unexplainable, because he lacks a grasp of any possible historical aspects on which to base his story. I found this to be a mixture of bits and pieces of the legend which other authors such as Cornwell, Bradshaw, McKenzie and even Miles tell more skillfully. Now -it was a VERY fast read and I did like the perspective. Unfortunately, I found Lancelot and Guinevere well developed while the other characters suffered. I did not read his first book Mad Merlin due to a personal disinterest in the main character. If you are eager to explore King's work - you may want to start at the beginning and see if it carries along from book one to book three.
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non (Signaler ce commentaire)



 
5.0étoiles sur 5 The moon sets on a great knight, Mai 28 2003
Par David Roy (Vancouver, BC) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   
Lancelot du Lethe is the second book featuring King's unique take on the Arthurian legends. Gone are the various pantheons of gods, as this book is mostly about the land of Britain itself, its ties with the Fey folk, and how Christianity is pushing everything aside. King plays with the legends even as he includes many things that we all know and love about them. This is a better book than the first and it doesn't contain any of the problems the first book had. It does, however, have a couple of its own.

As good as Mad Merlin was, this book is just so much richer that it's hard to believe. Anybody familiar with the Arthurian legends knows of the ill-fated love between Guinevere and Lancelot, and how the betrayal of Arthur affects Camelot and everything around it. While sticking to the basics of the legend, King adds so much more to the tapestry that it reads like a new tale. While Mad Merlin added the war between the gods, Lancelot du Lethe adds a great deal of detail to the land of the Fey, and the magical world that lies beneath and between the real world of man. Guinevere is of this land, and while she is married to Arthur in order to bring peace and stability to the land, she is drawn to Lancelot and his otherworldness. He harbours a secret of his own and draws her to him even more, a secret that even he doesn't know about. They are fated to be lovers as well, and this adds the main conflict to the story. The choices that King has the characters make are hard choices, and there are always consequences to them. He doesn't give them an easy way out like some authors do.

Guinevere is much more developed in this book than the last one. It was about Arthur and Merlin, and Guinevere was mainly a means to an end, a character that served a purpose and wasn't a whole lot more. Here, though, she comes into her own. She is a kind and good queen, but she is a woman who is living in a sexless marriage because if she gives in to Arthur, everything will be destroyed. When Lancelot shows up, she is inexplicably drawn to him. Their romance is tragic, even more tragic than in many tellings of the legends. Lancelot is a good man as well, and he knows what he feels will hurt Arthur. He continues to try and deny his feelings but he feels like he must follow his heart. King masterfully tells the story of how they dance around each other and their feelings, and Arthur's feelings as well, until ultimately something has to give. These are all good people, and the reader feels the tragedy even more because of that.

Other characters are not so well drawn, as they interact with these three only peripherally. I sometimes questioned the choices King made in this. Morgan le Fay and her son Mordred don't really come across very well. Morgan has plans for Lancelot but these plans are foiled more out of authorial fiat than by anything Lancelot actually does. She does have a hand in the tragic ending, much like in the legends, but she plays a relatively minor role overall. This is a shame because she's in the book a lot, and always lurking in the background and behind Mordred's plans as well. Mordred also doesn't come across as very interesting, and if King wasn't keeping to the basics of the legend, I would have liked to have seen a more interesting villain. As it is, his character is given more weight by his place in the stories that King is using than by King himself. And Merlin only makes a couple of token appearances. His first appearance is superfluous, however, and his second only provides a story element before he goes back to his wonderful life with his lady love. I think it would have been a better book either without him, or with a meatier part to the story.

Again, King does a wonderful job with the tools he is given and extrapolates very well, giving the story a fresh feel even as we know the basics of what is going to happen. The prose is again wonderful, with rich descriptions and vivid scenes. The interesting thing is how he extends the tales, and King delivers in spades. Sure, there are familiar items: other knights (Galahad, Gawain), the Holy Grail and the Spear of Longinus). However, the rich descriptions of the fairy world, the way King uses the fairies to supplement the intrigue in the real world, and the tragic elements King adds to the romance, all do their jobs nicely. Even when you know what's going to happen, you really don't. That's the perfect way to retell a legend.

There is another minor problem with the book, however. This is the almost anecdotal feel to the book. It almost seems like a set of stories with an overarching theme, almost like a "Stories of King Arthur and the Round Table" with stories that mainly center on Lancelot. While this may give it a feel of the old legends, I found it kind of distracting in a 450 page book that's not really a short story book. This problem is alleviated later on once events start rolling down the hill to their inevitable oblivion. But at first, it is a problem.

I will say that the ending is very fitting, though. King really outdoes his first book there. It's tragic yet it also has a glimmer of hope. It also provides the perfect bookend with the first book. Together, they make a wonderful visit to the land of Arthur, taking you back to the old days of jousts, chivalry, warriors in plate armour, and romance. I had a great time on my trip.

David Roy

Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non (Signaler ce commentaire)



 
4.0étoiles sur 5 A pleasant addition to Arthurian literature. . ., Nov. 5 2002
Par Joe Jacco (Sarasota, FL USA) - Voir tous mes commentaires
While I don't consider this two-book series ("Mad Merlin" and Lancelot du Lethe") one of the heavyweights of Arthurian retellings, I did find it pleasant and enjoyable. I'm probably being a tad generous in handing out four stars instead of a more appropriate three, but I'm torn just enough to give Mr. King the benefit of the doubt.

This book both adheres to the stock story of Mallory and varies wildly from it. It follows most of the major events of Mallory, such as the kidnapping of Guinevere, Lancelot's stewardship of the Joyous Garde, the birth of Galahad and his travails with the Holy Grail, and countless others. Its major departure, however, lies in the Otherworld origins of both Guinevere and Lancelot, their joint history as changelings, and the ensuing betrothals at their births. Mr. King uses these events to justify Lancelot and Guinevere's respective betrayals of Arthur and manages to have them all make nice-nice at the end. The ultimate end of the story and the impending end of Lancelot's days were downright poignant.

This is really obscure, but I found myself thinking of the fabulous baseball movie, "Eight Men Out", after I finished this book. The end that Lancelot came to in "Lancelot du Lethe" reminded me of the end that Shoeless Joe Jackson came to in the movie. If you saw the movie, you'll know what I mean. If not, I apologize for the oblique reference.

Anyway, I found this book to be a satisfactory addition to the genre of Arthurian literature and would recommend it to all fans.

Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non (Signaler ce commentaire)


Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients: Créer votre propre commentaire
 
 
Commentaires client les plus récents

5.0étoiles sur 5 superb retelling of the Camelot triangle
When Merlin first sees the newborn Lancelot he knows that the infant will one day destroy all that King Arthur accomplished at Mount Badon and Camelot. Read more
Publié le Déc 2 2001 par Harriet Klausner

Rechercher uniquement sur les commentaires portant sur ce produit



Cherchez des articles semblables par catégorie


Chercher des articles semblables par sujet


Commentaires

Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?

Votre historique récent

 (En savoir plus)

Après avoir visualisé des pages détaillées produit ou des résultats de recherche, regardez ici pour trouver une façon simple de poursuivre votre navigation sur des pages qui vous intéressent.