Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

 

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
16 used & new from CDN$ 8.95

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Scarlet Letter
 
 

Scarlet Letter (Hardcover)

by Michael Cisco (Author), Harold Bloom (Editor), Henry W (Editor)
2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (16 customer reviews)
List Price: CDN$ 32.01
Price: CDN$ 31.68 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 39. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.

8 new from CDN$ 31.67 8 used from CDN$ 8.95

Product Details


Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

16 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (7)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (5)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.8 out of 5 stars (16 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

 
4.0 out of 5 stars Please reconsider, Jun 7 2001
By "lencrenoire" (LA, CA USA) - See all my reviews
First of all, these reviews are supposed to refer to the Barron's Book Notes, rather than the actual book which it summarizes. I myself have not read the Book Notes, and therefore cannot comment on them. However, as I see that most (if not all) of the reviews here are directed towards the original book itself, which I have read, I *can* comment on that.

I would like to take the opportunity to respond to these reviews, which are on the whole incredibly unfair and show a blatant lack of interest. With such negative attitudes, how do you expect to enjoy this book? You have closed your minds from the beginning, or so it seems, and not waited to see if the book is worth reading. I, too, read this book not by choice, but by obligation; it was required this year (sophomore) at my high school. After my horrible experience with _Jane Eyre_ last year, which was pure agony, I was not particularly enthusiastic; however, I was pleasantly surprised to find that _The Scarlet Letter_ is well-written, interesting, and rich in symbolism -- some obvious, some not. This book does tend to include long descriptions and go into detail, but this only helps increase understanding of the author's point, as well as make the story more realistic and easily imagined. There are several memorable events in this book -- Hester's brief removal of her letter, the scaffold scene, etc. Although at times difficult, if you persevere, I think you will be richly rewarded.

However, I do acknowledge that there are some people who are not fond of this style of writing, and I respect all opinions. Regardless, that is not an excuse to deem the writer a horrible one, or try to discourage all others from giving this book a chance.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
4.0 out of 5 stars I get it!, Sep 29 2000
By Sarah (Ga, USA) - See all my reviews
I am a junior in college. I had to read this book once before for a lit. class my junior year in high school. I admit it was a bit difficult to read the first time, but I understood and enjoyed it this time. I recommend looking into what was going on during the Romantic Period and gaining an understanding of what Romantic writers focused on. It will help you understand the story line. And if you get a chance, check out some other works by Hawthorne, like The Birthmark or Young Goodman Brown. That will help you understand Hawthorne's style of writing.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
1.0 out of 5 stars What a joke!, Sep 26 2000
By ryry999 (New Lenox, IL USA) - See all my reviews
man, i have been reading this book for hightschool for almost 3 weekd now and we are only on chapter 12! that now dumb and complicated this book is to read. i feel that hawthorne went way beyond the standards for writing a good book. he plays with symbolism way too much and it tends to confuse the reads b/c they are unsure on what points to pick up on for being important. so i would have to say that iff you have to read this for school, just get the cliff notes and not waste the time in reading it!
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most recent customer reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars What are you talking about?
I don't understand why anyone would bash this book. Maybe you just didn't get it. I found it to be a little drawn out but Hawthorne's use of smbolism was so incredibly obvious... Read more
Published on April 3 2000 by suzy

4.0 out of 5 stars what are you guys talking about!
ok first of all, you have to totally over analyze this story to get it, and second, whoever said this wanst transcendentalist, i dont know what they are smoking! Read more
Published on Dec 8 1999 by Andrea

1.0 out of 5 stars If i could..i wouldn't even give this book one star...
I thought this book was so incredily boring...i dont understand why its required to read in high school...My teacher has already made us write 4 essays on it...
Published on Nov 7 1999

1.0 out of 5 stars anyone have a pistol?
This book was utterly WRETCHED! I can normally read a book in 2-3 days, and it took me three weeks to finish it. Read more
Published on Nov 2 1999

3.0 out of 5 stars The book is very complicated and over-wordy.
Hawthorne uses a lot of symbolism and themes, most of which he over-uses. His sentences last for paragraphs, and his style is so sophisticated it gave me headaches to read it... Read more
Published on Oct 4 1999

4.0 out of 5 stars hawthorn- a master of symbolic literature
read it twice, the frist time you get the plot the second you get the true skill it took to write it
Published on Sep 15 1999

1.0 out of 5 stars BORING!
It is 3 in the morning and I am trying to read this book, which has to be the most boring and worse writtien novel that I have ever picked up. Read more
Published on Aug 30 1999

2.0 out of 5 stars Overly descriptive
While the book has an interesting back-story, and a nice moral (religion gets you nowhere), it is overly descriptive, and at times, boring. Read more
Published on Mar 25 1999

4.0 out of 5 stars Ornate anti-transcendentalist novel.
This novel is heavily symbolic (perhaps too much so)with an overly-generous use of extended imagery. Read more
Published on Feb 13 1999

2.0 out of 5 stars It does not encompase the puritanism found within the novel
I designate the novel transcendental, using the term in a sense that will be distinguished from romanticism, for the use of transcendentalism is usually considered with in the... Read more
Published on Jan 15 1999 by sherlock_a_@hotmail.com

Only search this product's reviews



Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.