|
|
3 internautes sur 4 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile :
5.0étoiles sur 5
After Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto goes after the American carriers, Mai 9 2008
With their "Gettysburg" trilogy, Newt Gingrich and William R. Forstchen played out how the Civil War might have ended if the Confederates had won the pivotal battle between North and South in the first days of July 1863. Despite the assumptions of critics who leaped to the conclusion the authors were closet Southern apologists, the trilogy basically validated the argument that Forstchen laid out in an essay in "Alternate Gettysburgs" that Robert E. Lee and the Confederates could not have taken Washington, D.C. and that the losing the war was inevitable (although I should not that Forstchen posits a Confederate victory at Gettysburg on the second day while the trilogy he co-authored with Gingrich shifts the pivotal battlefield to Union Mills). With their World War II series, Gingrich and Forstchen take a similar approach. "Pearl Harbor: A Novel of December 8th" rewrites history so that the Japanese surprise attack is even more devastating, and in "Days of Infamy" start playing out what happens after that point.
The crucial change in the historical calculus at the heart of the first book in this series is that Admiral Yamamoto accompanies the task force and personally leads the attack, and consequently the Japanese launch a third attack wave against Pearl Harbor. By blocking the entrance to the harbor, destroying the largest dry-dock, and setting the fuel farms afire, Pearl Harbor is put out of business. I can certainly quibble with the title, because FDR was right: the day of the sneak attack was a "day of infamy," and what Gingrich and Forstchen come up with for the next few days (when the novel ends it is only December 10th) does not constitute additional "days of infamy." But I had trouble making the title of the first volume work and still enjoyed reading the book.
"Days of Infamy" is the more interesting book because Gingrich and Forstchen are now making everything up instead of just setting up their point of divergence from history. The Japanese ambassador in Washington still does not get the declaration of war delivered in time, so Americans are still outraged by the attack, but the key point they focus on this time around is that the attacked missed the American carriers. Having knocked Pearl Harbor out of commission, Yamamoto wants the two carriers. Equally important, Admiral Halsey on the "Enterprise" and Rear Admiral Newton with the "Lexington" are eager to hit back despite the odds (six Japanese carriers in a battle group versus two American carriers hundreds of miles apart). There is nothing Yamamoto can do about the diplomatic foul up, but he has a plan to get the American carriers and baits a trap for them. The Americans know that it is a trap, but after what happened on December 7th they have to strike back despite the long odds. This naval chess match takes up most of the action of "Days of Infamy."
I do not know as much about World War II as I do about the Civil War, but so far in these books I do not have a sense that the authors are indulging in having key details of history repeat themselves. This is one of the pitfalls of alternative histories that authors have to beware, trying to have their cake and eat it too when it comes to rewriting history (i.e., I really, really, really wanted General James B. McPherson to survive their version of the Civil War). What are more fascinating are when the authors play off of history (e.g., Bohunks), and when they come up with rationales for cleaning up some things (e.g., Eleanor's brief little chat with FDR).
Taken together "Pearl Harbor" and "Days of Infamy" comprise the opening act of this series, and I wish they had been one book because the whole point of such a story is to get to the point where things get different and that is pretty much where the first book ends. I have no idea how many volumes will be involved, but there is no way this is a trilogy (my assumption is that the end game is going to involve the invasion of Japan simply because the authors are not going to want to dig a giant hole with their "active history" and then pull a couple of atomic bombs out of their hat). I think the next volume will be the pivotal one in the series because it essentially replaces the Battle of Midway by being about the attempt to stop the Japanese from taking all of the American possessions west of Hawaii. The authors have something of an advantage in rewriting the war in the Pacific because nothing they come up with as fiction could compare with the true history of the Battle of Midway, but coming up with something comparable for the next volume will be key.
|
de Newt Gingrich
de Harry Turtledove
de Robert Conroy
de John Birmingham
de John Scalzi
