Most helpful customer reviews
|
|
2.0 out of 5 stars
That does it: another writer falling back on previous fame, Mar 15 2004
Once upon a time, "Michael Slade" wrote original, interesting stories with well-nuanced characters in a sub-genre of "splatterpunk". But that was 20 years ago, and the original authors behind the Slade name (John Banks, Jay Clarke, Lee Clarke, Richard Covell) have dispersed, leaving the father-daughter team of Jay and Rebecca Clarke to trade in on the earlier "glories", and all we get are the now-standard "Special X" characters and a franchise name. Pity. OK, I'll concede that there is a veneer of intelligence usually lacking in graphic (as in "gore-riddled") crime fiction, but just sticking a bibliography at the end of every book doesn't necessarily make that book intelligent in and of itself. "Death's Door" is the most egregrious example of laurel-resting I've come across in a looooong time, worse even than Stephen King's last two or three thousand books. Not only are the major characters recycled, including the villian ("Mephisto", oh, dear.....), they are now recycled cardboard. Zinc Chandler gets to bang his head (again - poor man would be in an institution by now), DeClerq gets to act the swell and brood (alternately), "Ghost Keeper" is even more of a stereotype than his last appearance, as is Ed "Mad Dog" Rabidowski (full-blown psychotic now), and the rest of the crew, well, what did you expect? I really hate it when an author can't break new ground and instead feels entitled to dish out familiar material to an apparently easily-satisfied fan-base. Believe me, if this was "Michael Slade's" *first* novel, no publisher would touch it. Do yourself a favor: if you've already read the first four Slade books ("Headhunter" through "Cutthroat"), you've read all that's *worth* reading. You can stop now and pick up something else, something different, original, and not continue to encourage sloppy, condescending, franchise gunk. Slade, if you come up with something OFF of the "Special X" gravy train you've been riding a little *too* long, I'll be delighted to check it out. Otherwise: you've sold me your last book.
|
|
|
2.0 out of 5 stars
Good First Chapter...Not Much Else, Aug 19 2003
I've rarely ever been so disappointed by novel I purchased as I was by Michael Slade's (Father and Daughter team) Death's Door. Before leaving the book store I had read the first chapter of the novel and was intrigued by the theft of the Mummy. And I when I read the back of the book I thought it held the possibility of maybe being a real page turner. However, as I've already said I was gravely disappointed by it. This book seemed to be more like a cheesey action film in print, with parts of a term paper on Egyptology thrown in for good measure inbetween. True, I have never read any other Slade works, and I know that Death's door is just a part in a series of novels dealing with the same character(s), so maybe I am lacking some necessary insight, but this is definitely a novel that sadly disappointed me.
|
|
|
1.0 out of 5 stars
The same, tired old formula, Jul 23 2003
By A Customer
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it" right? Wrong. In Slade's case, the same old formula needs not just fixing, it needs a total revamp. Here's the same template the authors have used since the first book Headhunter - a child gets sexually warped during his or her formative years (usually an incident involving a parent), the pyschosis gets surpressed for years until for some unknown reason it gets triggered when the child becomes an adult, that person then becomes the prime killer or hooks up with some madman bent on an insane scheme that if successful, will garner immeasurable riches. Interspersed inside this template are boring history lessons that some readers might find interesting, but are usually forgotten once the lesson is over. Sounds familiar right? The same framework was used in Headhunter, Ghoul, Cutthroat and now Death's Door and loosely fits the others. Yes I admit I've read all the books but the last two (Hangman and Death's Door) were read more out of hope that the authors might come up with something new than with any real relish for the tales concerned. Like another reviewer here, I too found myself skimming the pages out of sheer frustration. And perhaps the most damning indictment was that I've stopped reading it altogether for three weeks because I've completely lost interest (I'm 40 pages from the end but don't really care how it ends).If the authors don't revamp their storytelling, I won't be the only one losing interest.
|
|
|
Most recent customer reviews
|