Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Cradle
 
See larger image
 

Cradle (Hardcover)


2.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (25 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


10 used from CDN$ 1.46

Product Details


Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

25 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (10)
1 star:
 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.4 out of 5 stars (25 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

 
2.0 out of 5 stars Oddly Disappointing, Jul 13 2004
By Joshua Koppel (Chicago, IL United States) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Cradle (Paperback)
Years ago I eagerly purchased a copy of CRADLE by Arthur C. Clark and Gentry Lee. I had really enjoyed the books Clarke wrote just before CRADLE. I also enjoyed the books written later. But somehow I didn't get around to reading CRADLE until now. I must say that I was disappointed. I had been expecting Clarke's style as I had read in such books as THE HAMMER OF GOD and GHOST FROM THE GRAND BANKS. But the Clarke-Gentry mix just didn't do it for me.

The book could be easily described as RAMA doing the work of the Overlords from CHILDHOOD'S END. An unmanned probe comes to Earth to elevate the human species and restore a number of others. This plan is stumbled across by a reporter looking into the alleged disappearance of a secret Navy missile. The probe is making a journey to a dozen planet. At each planet it will assemble life forms based on specimens collected on an earlier visit. In CRADLE, a couple of humans get a chance to tell the aliens that we don't want humans to be elevated. That's pretty much it.

I had a hard time getting through this book. I normally fly through Clarke's books but this one was just bogged down in unnecessary details. This book also contained a large number of sexual scenes that I have to assume were the work of Lee as I have not encountered their like in Clarke's work. I really cannot recommend this book to anyone, so if you haven't read it and were considering it I have to give you fair warning.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting ideas but cookie-cutter characters, Oct 15 2003
By Craig MACKINNON (Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
This review is from: Cradle (Mass Market Paperback)
There is a piece Star Trek lore that states a race of beings called the Preservers went through the galaxy picking up semi-intellegent life and planting them around the galaxy to protect them from extinction/war/meteors. Spielberg's ET is essentially this same idea, and it's the idea behind this novel, Cradle. In fact, these same authors explore the same territory to better effect in their Rama series. So why read this book?

Frankly, it is inferior to the Rama series. The plot mostly focusses on a reporter trying to find a test missile she suspects was lost on a test flight. The navy, naturally, wants to prevent word of this leaking out, so are also searching for the missile. One of the absurdities of the book is that the reporter finds the missile site so easily when the navy has been looking for weeks (?) with more resources and information. There are similar absurdities throughout the book. In addition, the characters are laughably 2-dimensional, all defined by some life-altering mental or physical trauma that took place years before. Thirdly and most annoyingly, great detail is taken to explain the details of alien manufacture without telling the reader what they are assembling, so the reader must wade through 4 pages of alien automatons attaching sticks together to discover that they are building an antenna. It's really trying on the reader's patience!

And yet I couldn't help but enjoy the book. The pacing is quick, the writing is usually loose and flowing (with the exception noted above), and it's an easy read. It's not nearly as good as the Rama series, but more enjoyable than much of what's out there in science fiction.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
2.0 out of 5 stars Must be early Gentry Lee, Sep 15 2002
By Steve P (Michigan) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Cradle (Mass Market Paperback)
I had a very hard time with this book. I was quite confused, as I had read the whole Rama series as they came out. While perusing lists for something to read, I came across Cradle.

The beginning vignette about the "zoo craft" was, IMHO, written moderately well, but as soon as Carol comes on the scene, it gets very, well, amatuerish. I even went back and reviewed the Rama books, thinking that maybe I had read them so long ago that maybe they [were bad] then, but no, alas, they were (mostly) well constructed plots, with characters with whom I could relate, and relatively few confusing sections. Rama (original) did seem quite different from the others, but that made sense, since Clarke did the original in 1979 (or so, I think), and Lee came on with Rama II.

The opening vignette in Cradle seemed as if it were written by a totally different author, then shipped across the sea to another author who finished the rest of the book.

Then, it dawned on me, Cradle was either a) Written by an amateur author (Gentry Lee), with very little involvement with Clarke, or b) written by an entirely different author than the Rama series, again with little Clarke influence.

The constant switching "mindpoints" (where in one paragraph you hear what Carol is thinking, then the very next sentence you hear what Nick is thinking) is a typical early "learning writer" syndrome. There is a lot of "telling" instead of "showing". The plot points are haphazardly structured throughout, with interesting tidbits thrown in here and there without an uberpurpose. I felt throughout the whole novel that it might not go anywhere, and sho-nuff, it really didn't.

In the Rama II and beyond series, these problems are significantly improved, and show levels of improvement over the evolution of the series. My hypothesis supported conclusion "A" above.

I thought it might just be me, and I was too critical (since I am learning about crafting novels and writing, and checking how well-written novels are crafted), so I looked on Amazon to see what others had said. A majority didn't rate this book well either, for reasons I primarily agree with.

I then looked at when the books came out, and realized that Cradle came out in 1989, Rama II in 1990, Garden in 1992, and Revealed in 1995.

So, my conclusion is that this is the work of an early, learning writer. I gave it a mercy 2 stars, not 1, because it is an early work, and (presumably) Lee has improved significantly, but I've certainly read better.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most recent customer reviews

2.0 out of 5 stars Not up to the usual standard
I hate saying unpleasant things about other people's work because I'd hate it if they did it to me, but on this occasion I have to make an exception. Read more
Published on Aug 24 2000 by Keith Fraser

3.0 out of 5 stars Definitely not the best work from this pair
This novel is definitely not the best work out of the collaboritive efforts of Gentry Lee and Arthur Clarke, but it's still a pretty good novel. Read more
Published on Jul 6 2000 by William M. Rand

5.0 out of 5 stars This is the best book I have read in a long time!
This book is a must read if you love science fiction or if you love reading in general. If you like plot twists, comedy, and adventure you have it all in one book. Read more
Published on April 21 2000 by juls284

2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing
It has been a number of years since I read any science fiction, so I decided to play it safe and pick up something by an author with a long and outstanding track record. Read more
Published on April 17 2000 by Lee Rouse

1.0 out of 5 stars This book does not do justice to Clarke
This book does not do justice to Clarke

I don't recommend this book I thought it was boring. The content of science fiction was so low it can hardly be classified as science... Read more

Published on Mar 29 2000

4.0 out of 5 stars Generally I felt it was a fun, quick, interesting read.
Overall I don't think this is some amazing book, but it was a really fast, fun, and quick read. I must have read the book in 2 hours, and found it to be quite fun to get into the... Read more
Published on Feb 22 2000 by Erik Johnson

1.0 out of 5 stars I can't believe I read the whole thing.
This is one of the stupidest books I have ever read, and I have read hundreds of science fiction novels. Read more
Published on Nov 29 1999 by Robert Steimle

1.0 out of 5 stars A Weak Effort!
I generally love Arthur C. Clarke, but I have never felt a book I paid for was so worthless.

This book is far more about character development poorly done than the normal Clarke... Read more

Published on Nov 9 1999

2.0 out of 5 stars Not one of Clarke's best works...
Despite what many of the other reviewers said, I don't think Gentry Lee was the reason this book wasn't very good. Read more
Published on Sep 23 1999

1.0 out of 5 stars Buy something else
If you like Clarke, do not buy this book or you will be disappointed. If you have not read Clarke before, do not buy the book or you will think that all his novels are like this... Read more
Published on Mar 19 1999

Only search this product's reviews



Look for similar items by category


Feedback


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.