Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

14 used & new from CDN$ 5.99

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Mission to Mars (Widescreen)
 
See larger image
 

Mission to Mars (Widescreen)

Starring: Gary Sinise, Tim Robbins Director: Brian De Palma MPAA Rating: PG
2.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (242 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


10 new from CDN$ 8.67 4 used from CDN$ 5.99

Product Details


Product Description

From Amazon.com

If Brian De Palma directed Mission to Mars for 10-year-olds who've never seen a science fiction film, he can be credited for crafting a marginally successful adventure. Isolated moments in this film serve the highest purpose of its genre, inspiring a sense of wonder and awe in the context of a fascinating future (specifically, the year 2020). But because most of us have seen a lot of science fiction films, it's impossible to ignore this one's derivative plot, cardboard characters, and drearily dumb dialogue. Despite an awesome and painstakingly authentic display of cool technology and dazzling special effects, Mission to Mars is light years away from 2001: A Space Odyssey on the scale of human intelligence.

After dispensing with a few space-jockey clichés, the movie focuses on a Mars-bound rescue mission commanded by Jim McConnell (Gary Sinise), whose team (Tim Robbins, Connie Nielsen, Jerry O'Connell) has been sent to retrieve the sole survivor (Don Cheadle) of a tragic Mars landing. During the sequence en route to Mars, De Palma's in his element with two suspenseful scenes (including a dramatic--albeit somewhat silly--space walk) that are technically impressive. But when this Mission gets to Mars, the movie grows increasingly unconvincing, finally arriving at an alien encounter that more closely resembles an astronomical CGI video game. But this is a $75 million Hollywood movie, and no amount of technical wizardry can lift the burden of a juvenile screenplay. Kudos to Sinise, his costars, and the special effects wizards for making the most of hoary material; shame on just about everyone else involved. --Jeff Shannon



On the DVD

Audio commentary
Animatics to scene comparison
Documentary: "Visions of Mars"
Visual effects analyses
Production art gallery
DVD-ROM
Theatrical trailer
French and Spanish tracks
Spanish subtitles
5.1 EX Surround
Widescreen [2.35:1] enhanced for 16x9 televisions

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Red Planet (Widescreen)

Red Planet (Widescreen)

DVD ~ Antony Hoffman
3.0 out of 5 stars (131)  CDN$ 6.99
Space Cowboys (Widescreen)

Space Cowboys (Widescreen)

DVD ~ Clint Eastwood
3.5 out of 5 stars (115)  CDN$ 9.93
U-571 (Widescreen)

U-571 (Widescreen)

DVD ~ Jonathan Mostow
3.2 out of 5 stars (292)  CDN$ 9.99
Collateral (Widescreen)

Collateral (Widescreen)

DVD ~ Michael Mann
4.8 out of 5 stars (4)  CDN$ 12.99
Dirty Harry

Dirty Harry

DVD ~ Don Siegel
4.7 out of 5 stars (81)  CDN$ 19.99
Explore similar items

 

Customer Reviews

242 Reviews
5 star:
 (42)
4 star:
 (38)
3 star:
 (29)
2 star:
 (41)
1 star:
 (92)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.6 out of 5 stars (242 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

 
4.0 out of 5 stars It had me for the first hour OR A glimpse of pre-Stargate: Atlantis' Kavan Smith, Sep 29 2009
I recently saw a trailer for Mission to Mars and thought it looked interesting.
I enjoyed most of the film, but the ending took me by surprise. It seemed to me that two very different writers wrote this script. One wrote everything up to The Door (you'll know what I mean if you watch it... don't want to spoil it for anyone) and then some lame-brain wrote the last 20 minutes or so. When it was over, I was left staring at the screen, wishing I could give the director and writer(s?) a really hard smack on the back of the head. I felt rather ripped off in that I'd invested a couple of hours in this and really wasn't in the mood for an odd, artsy ending that day. Still, it hasn't gone in my "Give to a friend cos I don't like it" box because I quite like the first three-quarters of the film.

The scenery, special effects, camera angles, characters, and so on are sure to please, and there's a brief appearance by Alberta's own pre-Stargate: Atlantis' Kavan Smith (looking mighty fine).
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
1.0 out of 5 stars Hideously Horrible! 8-(, Jun 23 2004
Why some people gave this stinker four or five stars is light years beyond me, and I love good sci-fi. I thought Red Planet was pretty bad until I saw this movie, and I realized that even Red Planet had some (not much) redeeming value by comparison. The negative reviews here accurately sum up the reasons why this is one of the worst movies ever made. I really struggled to stay with it 'til the end, if only for morbid curiosity.

Absolutely the steaming pile you've heard it is...

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
2.0 out of 5 stars Worst Alien Ever!, Mar 19 2004
By Moldyoldie (Motown, USA) - See all my reviews
*SPOILER WARNING*
How would you like to go through what the characters do in this film, only to come face-to-face with a technologically advanced cartoon? What were the filmmakers thinking?
Derivative and cliche-ridden as it was, the story is actually compelling. Fine efforts were made to replicate scientifically plausible scenes in space. Once on Mars, however, plausibility is virtually thrown out the escape hatch.
Using "The Face" as a plot point was ridiculous since by the time we send a manned expedition to Mars, the planet and its landmarks would have been thoroughly mapped. The characters' sense of surprise at seeing "The Face" was when the film lost its grip on me. Despite the odds against the characters being drawn to "The Face" on a planet the size of Mars being "astronomical", it still COULD be explained by extraterrestrial intervention. Let's forget the fact that "The Face" has already been scientifically dismissed as a natural simulacrum caused by light and shadow. Kids could care less.
Once inside "The Face", we're taken on the "mysteries of the universe" goose chase which made previous films such as "2001" and "Close Encounters" memorable, but here leaves us with a sense of the filmmakers simply throwing away an ending to what has been a compelling narrative. Kids could care less.
But what absolutely lost it for me was "The Alien". C'mon, people; if you can't come up with a scientifically plausible alien, don't give us a damned cartoon! I'm not sure even kids were fooled by this one...absolutely terrible! THAT'S what made this film a waste. It's a good example of how one bad but crucial decision turned a decent entertainment into dreck.
All that being said, the overall production values elevate this film to "guilty pleasure" status. Kids might actually enjoy it in toto. Adults, however, will not look back in fondness upon seeing it.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most recent customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Worst movie I have ever seen
This is definetly the worst movie I have ever gone to go see in the big screen. I remember I kept wishing for the movie to end and I almost got up and left. Lisez davantage
Published on Mar 7 2004 by J. Contreras

4.0 out of 5 stars a movie for someone with nothing to do
I want to start off by saying that i like this movie. Sure it wasn't very realistic, but hey i don't watch movies for realism; i watch documentaries for that. Lisez davantage
Published on Mar 3 2004 by {HB}SharkMan

1.0 out of 5 stars Numbingly horrible...
In an imaginary contest for ultimately bad films "Mission to Mars" would walk out with a bunch of precious awards. Lisez davantage
Published on Feb 28 2004 by Takis Tz.

3.0 out of 5 stars SOMEDAY...
...Brian DePalma will jolt us with his albeit derivative but amazing directorial skills he evidenced in CARRIE, BLOWOUT, BODY DOUBLE and DRESSED TO KILL
... Lisez davantage
Published on Feb 17 2004 by Michael Butts

3.0 out of 5 stars Great concept, wrong tone
The revelation which caps "Mission To Mars" is a stunning one and deserves to be part of a much better film. Lisez davantage
Published on Jan 23 2004 by Steven Reynolds

1.0 out of 5 stars watch JOHN CARPENTER'S GHOSTS OF MARS instead
This movie is simply boring and far beyond any enjoyment. The script is unexciting and boring, a silly plot. Lisez davantage
Published on Jan 7 2004 by Wilhelm Kerth

4.0 out of 5 stars CINEMATIC EXPLORATION FROM NONE OTHER THAN DE PALMA
If you are the typical hormone-besotted male mind in today's audiences that are the target of Hollywood's recent fascination with flying bodies pummeling and kicking each other in... Lisez davantage
Published on Jan 4 2004 by Shashank Tripathi

1.0 out of 5 stars The Comedy of the Year
This movie is fall-down, belly-laughing hilarious. If only if it were intentional.

The strangest thing about the movie is that as bad as it is, it wouldn't have taken much to... Lisez davantage

Published on Dec 4 2003 by Jude C. Cooper

3.0 out of 5 stars Fair Warning
Great movie up to the point where the big door goes up and they go into the solar system room. You'll know what I mean when you get to it. Lisez davantage
Published on Nov 21 2003 by Robert Blank

5.0 out of 5 stars This movie is often misunderstood and underrated by viewers.
Many feedback I see from others are concentrated on the script. For those people who underrated this film, I suggest you study space exploration first, and then rate this movie... Lisez davantage
Published on Oct 28 2003

Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.