Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

11 used & new from CDN$ 7.65

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
The Devil Wears Prada
 
See larger image
 

The Devil Wears Prada


3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


8 new from CDN$ 10.30 3 used from CDN$ 7.65

What do customers ultimately buy after viewing this item?


Product Details


Product Description

Review

The discovery that Aline Brosh McKenna's adaptation of Lauren Weisberger's roman-a-clef, The Devil Wears Prada, marks McKenna's fourth big-screen credit (she authored Three to Tango (1999), Laws of Attraction (2004) and If Only (2004)) may astound the viewer, for McKenna's script for Prada is so laden with errors that it suggests a first-year screenwriting student's flaw-filled excuse for a last-minute draft. Aspiring screenwriters should attend this film and take notes on which mistakes to avoid - mistakes so brazenly obvious that we can count them as they fly out and whonk us on the head. Given the level of talent in the cast, and the obvious comic intuition of director David Frankel (a key contributor to the ere-inspired Sex in the City), an A-list feature with this pedigree can claim no valid excuse for such ugly fallibility and bald klutziness. The core of the problem: McKenna fails to establish Andie's (Anne Hathaway) motivations clearly at the film's outset. (We wonder why in the hell Andrea would bother applying for a position in a field that she doesn't seem to give a whit about, so limp and pathetic is her application speech to prospective boss Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep). McKenna establishes the reasons behind Andie's decision to apply during an over-dinner dialogue between Andrea and her father. But it arrives almost thirty minutes into the picture. (How can we actually be expected to root for Andie if the scripter, for almost half an hour, withholds the vital information that the girl is a freelance writer, who hopes to network her way from an entry-level magazine assistantship into the hearts of established authors who contribute to the publication?) No matter - for if this strains credibility and erodes our patience, the film enters the realm of the ludicrous when it has Andie rejecting an offer by prospective-suitor Christian Thompson (Aussie thesp Simon Baker) to put her in touch with an editor from New York Magazine who could make all of her dreams happen with a snap of his fingers - Andie evidently turns Thompson down just so that she can head home to celebrate the birthday of an oversexed boyfriend, Nate, whom we have seldom seen and honestly could care less about. (The film's tone falls to pieces at this point; it will elicit howls and catcalls from any viewer who has seriously aspired to a writing career and grasps the preciousness of Thompson's offer). Innumerable other elements contribute to the film's absolute destruction of plausibility (Andie's ten-minute transition from butterfingered, latte-juggling secretary to telepathic whiz girl as a product of her instant wardrobe change; her ability to suddenly, without substantial explanation, fund a million-dollar wardrobe that would make the board of execs at Neiman Marcus blush). But ultimately, the film is too shallow to succeed because McKenna and Frankel reduce it to a two-dimensional, pseudo-leftwing parable on the ills of "selling out" to capitalism, like a bastardized feminine reworking of Oliver Stone's Wall Street. And the picture doesn't seem to believe what it preaches: it handles its tone so maladroitly that, by its messy (and hopelessly confusing) denouement, we may find ourselves siding with Streep's character and wondering how in the world Andrea could be such an idiot by walking away from her career. Hathaway ushers in a soft and luminous screen presence, but Streep's throwaway performance as the icewater-veined Priestly gives her too little screen time. Most impressive is Stanley Tucci, who, as a soft-hearted gay employee of the magazine and Hathaway's mentor - wins us over immediately. He suggests manifold levels of depth with only a handful of scenes. And when he receives the shock of a lifetime at the picture's conclusion, the expression on his face not only sings a mournful elegy to the lack of justice in this world, but says more about the heartlessness of the fashion industry than anything else in the picture. ~ Nathan Southern, All Movie Guide

On the DVD

Audio commentary with director David Frankel, producer Wendy Finerman, costume designer Patricia Field, screenwriter Aline Brosh McKenna, editor Mark Livolsi and director of photography Florian Ballhaus
Deleted scenes with director and editor commentary
The Trip to the Big Screen featurette
NYC and Fashion featurette
Fashion Visionary Patricia Field featurette
Getting Valentino featurette
Boss from Hell featurette
Gag reel

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
(1)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Rumour Has It (Full Screen)

Rumour Has It (Full Screen)

DVD ~ Jennifer Aniston
4.3 out of 5 stars (3)  CDN$ 15.99
Basic Instinct 2 (Unrated, Extended Cut)

Basic Instinct 2 (Unrated, Extended Cut)

DVD ~ Sharon Stone
2.2 out of 5 stars (8)  CDN$ 12.99
Big [Blu-ray]

Big [Blu-ray]

CDN$ 17.99
Monster-in-Law

Monster-in-Law

DVD ~ DVD
3.0 out of 5 stars (3)  CDN$ 12.95
27 Dresses (Widescreen)

27 Dresses (Widescreen)

DVD ~ DVD
2.8 out of 5 stars (5)  CDN$ 11.99
Explore similar items

 

Customer Reviews

10 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.5 out of 5 stars (10 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

 
4.0 out of 5 stars Ah corporate greed; can it be overcome; should it be?, May 18 2008
By bernie "xyzzy" (Arlington, Texas) - See all my reviews
(TOP 50 REVIEWER)   
This is a fun little story. It is adapted form a book and adjusted with a few changes to a formula (very predictable) story of corporate greed vs. individual morality. On this inner journey for the beauty of one's soul we are treated to an outward experience of the world of fashion.

Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) an aspiring writer is hard up for a job and lands one as an assistant to Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep ), top fashion designer and feared ruthless executive. Soon she is sucked into a would that She had not idea existed. In the book she is entices by the perks of free stylish goodies. In the move she is slowly seduced by the devil (Miranda) herself . She is mentored and guides past the competition by Nigel (Stanley Tucci.)

Do you recognize the Vivian West and Bill Ballast? How about the other vintage styles. Just as the styles will not distract from the movie neither will the sound score which does not try to compete with the dialog; however it does abruptly change volume.

Even if the story is formula the acting and actors make this a fun way to pass time. So gird your loins.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
4.0 out of 5 stars takes aim at the world of high fashion (3.5/5), Oct 19 2007
By falcon "disdressed12" (canada) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
this movie is billed as being a comedy drama,but it is more of a black
comedy than straight comedy.the movie is very sarcastic and ironic in
its portrayal of the fashion industry in general,and the head of a
major fashion magazine in particular.Meryl Streep plays Miranda
Priestly the head of the major fashion magazine Runway.Anne Hathaway
plays Andy Sachs,an eager young woman who dreams of becoming a top
journalist and thinks that working as assistant to Miranda Priestly for
one year will be her ticket into real journalism.Stanley Tucci plays
Nigel,a lifer at the company(really nothing more than a glorified
worker bee,who thinks much higher of himself)who hopes to one day
leave the company and have a venture of his own.Streep Plays Priestly
as a scathing,ruthless,ice queen,concerned about nothing and no one but
herself and the magazine.she has little time for the peons under
her(who of course do all the work and get no credit).she is virtually
void of emotion or human feeling of any kind.though there are a few
scenes witch show there might be a human being under there.she is also
shown in a few scenes as being vulnerable and insecure,as she has a
husband who treats her as she treats those around her.Hathaway's Sachs
is a fashion neophyte,as naive as she is eager.time goes on and things
change,of course.in time Sachs learns valuable life
lessons,naturally.the movie at times is sappy and maudlin and the
character of Sachs is played a bit to unreal(in my opinion) in the latter stages of
the movie.the movie is filled with witty,sharp dialogue that flows very
smoothly.Streep' performance is subtle and understated but bang on for
her character.Tucchi's Nigel provides some dry comic relief and
glimpses of humanity.Hathaway fails to make a big impact,and is really
just fodder in much of the movie. supposedly the character of Miranda Priestly is
purportedly based on a real person.
anyway,this movie rates a solid 3.5/5
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
5.0 out of 5 stars Best Film of the Year!!, Aug 25 2007
I totally rate this 5stars, it's everything you look for in a film: funny, sentimental and heart racing! (especially when you see the Valentino cat walk scene!!) And, yes, it even has a moral to the story, which is hard to come across in the recent "blow their brains out" action films! I reccomend it to anyone who has a good scence of humour and I reccomend them to reccomed it to their friends!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most recent customer reviews

1.0 out of 5 stars What is with this movie?
I just don't get it! What is so amazing about this movie? A full sentence can't even sum it up!
Here's what I can muster: This movie was utterly, predictable, lame, boring,... Read more
Published 19 months ago by G. Motychko

4.0 out of 5 stars Outstanding Cast and an Enjoyable Story
Obviously this weekend my wife had control of the television. That's alright though because whenever that happens I usually end up having lower expectations then usual and find... Read more
Published on July 16 2007 by Kasey Driscoll

4.0 out of 5 stars And uh..............that's all (followed by a wave of a hand),
Haven't read the book so I have nothing to compare this movie to. But I don't think I would regret not having read the book first. Read more
Published on Jun 23 2007 by Jenny J.J.I.

3.0 out of 5 stars Realisitcally entertaining moview
Meryill Streep is amazingly brilliant as usual in this movie. I enjoyed the humour and the fashion in this movie. Read more
Published on Mar 23 2007 by Summer G

2.0 out of 5 stars The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit is a woman and clothes to die for
I don't know anything about the fashion industry or fashion writing industry, but I thought "The Devil Wore Prada" was a great book. The characters were archetypes. Read more
Published on Feb 18 2007 by Gary Howard

4.0 out of 5 stars The Devil Wore Prada
Meryl Streep at her finest. This performance should get her another academy award. Anne Hathaway also enhances the movie as her reluctant assistant who starts out as an authentic... Read more
Published on Feb 12 2007 by Marcia

4.0 out of 5 stars Can I please borrow Andrea?
Andrea wasn't glamorous
She knew nothing of fashion
To pay the bills she got a job
That soon became a passion

Day after day she took abuse... Read more
Published on Jan 6 2007 by Amanda Richards

Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Feedback



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.