|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 out of 5 stars
Cliche', cliche', cliche......., Jun 9 2004
Starts good, but fall on it's face past half of the movie. Definitely another Stephen King film. Never again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 out of 5 stars
Waste of film!, Jun 6 2004
This movie is boring, weak and nearly plotless. The acting was bad too. Terrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 out of 5 stars
Too many assumptions!, Jun 2 2004
This is a good book overall, but it never quite focus too well and it leaves the subject at the end with way too many assumptions that will make you feel like you have been running in circles and never really got anywhere. Overall: Decent to Good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 out of 5 stars
Too many assumptions!, Jun 2 2004
This is a good book overall, but if never quite focus too well and it leaves the subject at the end with way too many assumptions that will make you feel like you have been running in circle and never really got nowhere. Overall: Decent to Good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 out of 5 stars
Decent but long!, Jun 2 2004
This movie just runs too long. The dialogue is stiff enough to bore you and the overall feel of the movie is pretty much cliche'. The FX are excellent however and the movie is, in it's own right, a masterpiece. Overall: DECENT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 out of 5 stars
Lame and Weak!, May 18 2004
I love Adriano Celentano classic songs, but this album is a weak remake of some american classics as well as some italian originals which do not stand up. Overall: MEDIOCRE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very good good, but........, May 14 2004
I found this reading on Quantum physics to be very good overall, but many explanations were carried over in a more complexed and technical manner than necessary. The wave definition chapter is very good and gives you a good understanding on the basic laws of waves (very important in quantum physics). The Dirac's view on the subject is very poorly explained, and the general tendency on relying on thecnical explanations (as mentioned before) makes this reading somewhat fatiguing at time. Overall a good book, but not the only one you might want to read on the subject for a full understanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good job!, April 22 2004
This remake is very good indeed. It is fairly different than the original one but it packs some excellent moments and the acting is also top notch. Is it the final black and white video of the two police officers getting killed in the basement real? Overall: VERY GOOD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 out of 5 stars
BAD, BAd, Bad, bad......, April 14 2004
It seems that the Godzilla movies are retrograding with time. This film is seriously bad. The FX are terrible and, overall, outdated. The acting, storyline, dialogue, plot and characters are silly and shallow. A good Godzilla movie can definately be done with great realistic FX, decent story and characters, why do they keep on making this trash? I prefer the american version of Godzilla to this one 100 times. Even the latest Gamera movies have much better Fx than this one. Overall: MEDIOCRE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very revealing and out there!, April 6 2004
I have been studying physics (relativity, quantum mechanics, M-theory, cosmology and astrophysics) for quite sometime now and I have felt that the leading edge theories do seem to blend into the spiritual and metaphysical realm. This book answers many questions and makes good sense, it's even consistent with quantum theory. I do not give it 5 stars because some of the explanations are somewhat vague and the all Mars-Earth colonization story is a little far out (to my opinion at least....). Otherwise this is a great book, well worth reading it. If you are interested in a similar book with a more scientifical inclination on the subject -The Holographic Universe- is another excellent reading you might not want to miss.
|
|