bixodoido

 
Helpful votes received on reviews: 95% (81 of 85)
Location: Utah, USA
Birthday: May 7
In My Own Words:
'The power men possess to annoy me I give them by a weak curiosity.' --Ralph Waldo Emerson.
 

Reviews

Top Reviewer Ranking: 76,830 - Total Helpful Votes: 81 of 85
The Chessboard of War: Sherman and Hood in the Aut&hellip by Anne J. Bailey
This book is a very thorough and detailed account of two of the Civil Wars' most important and consequential campaigns, but sadly two campaigns about which relatively little has been written. Sherman's march to the sea and Hood's campaign into Tennessee destroyed the last hope for the Confederacy in the Deep South, and did much to undermine the confidence of Lee's army. Without Sherman's psychological victory over the Southern psyche, and without Hood's rash attacks on Franklin and Nashville, the war, at least in that theater, would probably have been prolonged for at least another year. Both men, in their own way, contributed to the war's ending, and this is one of Bailey's main… Read more
Henderson the Rain King by Saul Bellow
Henderson the Rain King by Saul Bellow
This is an interesting piece of expatriate literature. The "Lost Generation"--represented by the likes of Hemingway and Fitzgerald--churned out a host of literature that dealt with an America that was recovering from two world wars, and that was just beginning to realize its significance as a world power. This book belongs to the next generation of Americans, one who may not be able to find all of the answers in America but who nevertheless has a sense of national identity. It is a tale of a man named Henderson, an eccentric American millionaire who realizes he is searching for something and has to go to Africa to find it. Henderson, a man who never seems to do anything right,… Read more
McClellan, Sherman and Grant by T. Harry Williams
McClellan, Sherman and Grant by T. Harry Williams
This short book is really three separate essays about three of the North's most controversial generals. They seem to be arranged in the author's estimation of them, with McClellan being the poorest general and Grant the best. The essays are insightful, and Williams argues some interesting points that differ from what most historians believe, especially in the case of Sherman and McClellan. Throughout it all, he seems to remain, for the most part, fair, neither condemning nor fully praising any of the three. I don't personally agree with his argument that the primary objective in war should be destroying the enemy's army, and thus would rank Sherman higher than Grant, but I do think he… Read more