Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

10 used & new from CDN$ 3.95

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Star Trek: Nemesis (Full Screen)
  

Star Trek: Nemesis (Full Screen)


3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (350 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


1 new from CDN$ 21.42 9 used from CDN$ 3.95


Product Details


Product Description

From Amazon.com

The sacrifice of a beloved character is just one of many highlights in Nemesis, the 10th feature in the lucrative Star Trek franchise. Enigmatically billed as the beginning of "A Generation's Final Journey," this richly plotted Next Generation adventure maintains the "even number rule" regarding Trek's feature quality, and it's one of the best in the series. It hits its brisk stride when Picard (Patrick Stewart) and his Enterprise-E crew encounter Shinzon (Tom Hardy), a younger clone of Picard, rejected by the Romulans as the human weapon of an abandoned conspiracy. Raised on the nocturnal Romulan sister planet Remus, Shinzon now plots revenge against Romulus and Earth but needs Picard's blood to carry out his scheme. A wedding, a childlike "duplicate" Data named B-4 (Brent Spiner), spectacular space battles, and uncommon acts of valor make this a tautly-paced action thriller, poised to pass the franchise (but not quite yet) to a new generation of Starfleet personnel. Die-hard Trekkers will not be disappointed. --Jeff Shannon

Additional Features

The Nemesis DVD is distinguished by excellent picture and thrilling sound, especially in the starship battle sequences. The bonus features are much more generous than the offerings on previous Star Trek theatrical films other than the two-disc special editions. There are four featurettes (46 minutes total) discussing the casting of Shinzon, development of the story line, shooting the action scenes, and the themes of family and change that run through the film. Director Stuart Baird contributes a commentary track that is a bit dry and sometimes silent. He mentions how he's not a Trek insider and that because he was working in an established setting he didn't have the freedom of creation that directors usually do. He also discusses the mechanics of shooting and points out where certain scenes were shortened or eliminated. Seven of the cut scenes appear on the DVD, some introduced by Baird or Patrick Stewart. They're interesting to see, but none was a great loss from the finished film. --David Horiuchi

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


 

Customer Reviews

350 Reviews
5 star:
 (96)
4 star:
 (90)
3 star:
 (59)
2 star:
 (48)
1 star:
 (57)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.3 out of 5 stars (350 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars A Huge Letdown, Feb 21 2004
By David M. Roduner (Columbus, OH USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I really wanted to like this film. I really did. That's why it hurts so much to have to write this. But I must warn others. Do not see this film. I remember the excitement I felt when I discovered this film was going to be released. Alas.

There are possible spoilers below, so beware.

The film starts pleasantly enough, with Riker's wedding to Troi after showing trouble in the midst of the Romulan government. Wesley Crusher is finally given his due screen appearance. He is as gorgeous as always. I know that they cut out an entire 45 minute segment featuring him, which I was unhappy to hear.

Next, the Trek crew finds scans indicating posotronic activity on a planet, so they go to investigate, finding parts to an android almost identical to Data. They land on a desert planet and Picard acts completely unlike his character. The reserved French captain is now a high testosterone mini-dimensional fun lovin' bad cop kind of guy roving through the desert in a Jeep/Hummer-esque vehichle. I can't quite grasp how Data could locate this new android if only the brain is posotronic, which has been hammered into our heads since the series began. But forget all the rules made so far. To quote the Fantasticks, this movie "defies logic and achieves ignorance!" In the desert the crew meets nasty creatures that look like copies of Max Shreck's 1922 Nosferatu. Of course the vehichles are equipped with laser cannons and such and much F/X money was spent making loud booms.

After this lame adventure, the new android is put together. It is Data's mentally disabled brother. Blah blah blah. We already did this. It would have been much more interesting to do exploration with the Lor character. Hmm.. imagine doing battle with Lor. At least THAT would be a match for the Trek crew. Anyway, the new android is called B4. How tacky. A very uninteresting subplot altogether.

The "story" continues, if you can call it that. We learn the Romulan senate has a new praetor, Shinzon. Jean Luc gets an awesome cameo from Janeway. Next, the Enterprise-E visits Romulus, and of course war breaks out, blah blah blah.

**end of obvious spoilers you already figured out from the preview**

The villain, Shinzon is underdeveloped. The story is too. It felt like echoes of Wrath of Khan were bubbling here. This is the first Star Trek I've seen that was simply a lame battle scenario. Half of the movie was spent at war. It felt felt the Matrix Revolutions to me. Pointless one dimensional buildup and buildup, huge battles, but absolutely no pleasure or satifaction in any of it.

Star Trek has been great because each episode/movie dealt with a moral dilemma choice, well built characters and intriguing situations. This movie has none of that. It's just a big battle. If you like explosions and loud sound effects, this movie is for you. If not, beware. Characters are altered for no reason whatsoever. There is no real emotional buildup, just constant fighting, so the climax is boring and uninteresting. It feels like this is the end of Trek, which truly saddens me. It feels like Star Trek is trying to reinvent itself. It was fine before, people! That's why there is still a fan base! Even the music felt similar to the hokey music from the first season of TNG - even with those crappy 80s synth sounds. I cannot say enough: avoid this movie.

1/5

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Watch...the future of Trek movies end., Feb 14 2004
I can only hope 'Star Trek' can't get any worse than this. A recycled and dumbed-down plot stolen from Star Trek II fails to awe me as the TNG casts supposed final mission.

This movie blatantly defies the even-odd rule of Trek movies, therefore requiring the rule to be modified. I suggest the following:

"While even-numbered Star Trek movies are inevitably better than odd-numbered ones, every fifth movie is terrible, regardless of numbering."

Anyway, this movie has very few redeeming qualities. The special effects are very good, though they obviously can't be the driving force behind a movie (this must've been what Berman was going for). I've read that Paramount dropped ILM for this movie; and if so, another thing it has in common with Star Trek V. Though in that case, the result was awful effects detracting even more from an awful movie. In 'Nemesis', the effects were the only thing that kept me awake.

The actors seem bored, and I honestly can't blame them. You'll be bored to, if you have the courage to sit through the disgrace in the first place. If they'd wanted to kill off Data, they should've done it in 'First Contact', where his death would've had more meaning (saving humanity from the Borg as opposed to a perverted, dying megalomaniac with the brains of a peanut). Overall, this movie is a terrible entry into the 'Star Trek' series, and I hope never to see it again.

If Paramount decides to do another one (which I very much doubt, given how much this one bombed), they should attempt to recapture the spirit of the previous Trek movies. Nemesis seems as if it was made in a desperate attempt to appeal to an almost non-existant mainstream audience. Unfortunately, due to the stigma attached to the 'Star Trek' franchise, this audience simply doesn't exist. If Nemesis had been made as a generic sci-fi/action movie, it may have done better. But attaching the ST name to a movie ensures you attract very few people other than fans of the series.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Watch in Horror as the TNG Cast destroys a beloved Franchise, Feb 2 2004
By "monkeysand" (Sitting on the beach) - See all my reviews
What more can be said about the TNG cast that hasn't already been said? (Good or Bad.) All I can say is as a casual fan of ST I only know what I see and the bottom line is The TNG cast has destroyed this awesome franchise. No question about it. Since the premier of the first TNG Episode to the end of this movie they have managed to only, poorly, imitate the original cast.

I respect Gene Roddenberrys vision and I know that he would frown on this movie. No doubt. The TNG movies have done nothing but rip off the original cast movies by repackaging and recycling old ideas and presenting them as new. THIS MOVIE is a perfect example. This movie is just a remake of ST II The Wrath of Khan...bottom line. Don't waste your money. Spend your money on the original. Borrow this movie from a friend or something but don't buy into this recycled, unoriginal, broken down, TNG series.

TNG has never been original. They used some of the old cast for Generations because they had no clue how to be original. They stole the Time travel idea from ST IV for First Contact and now they have remade ST II. Don't buy into it. You will only encourage the suits in Hollywood to make more unoriginal junk like this.

However, judging by the box office receipts on this movie, alot of people stayed away, so that is encouraging! And I have to thank the TNG Cast for failing so miserably with their movies because this means they have ruined it for the Voyager cast. So hopefully we won't have to sit through any Voyager movies thanks to the destruction laid out by TNG! Who knows what Original cast plot lines Voyager would have stolen?

I do like Brent Spiner and Patric Stewart...when they are not making ST movies or tv episodes.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most recent customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Equal to First Contact as the best of all the Star Trek films (4.5/5)
This third(and presumably final,but who knows?)voyage for the crew of The Next Generation,is,in my mind,arguably the best of the Star Trek Series. Read more
Published on Aug 20 2007 by falcon

5.0 out of 5 stars Best Trek to date
This has to be one of the best Star Trek films to date. Its right up there with 2 and 6 which is what I believe to best of the whole series. Read more
Published on Mar 22 2005 by gottalock

3.0 out of 5 stars So much action accompanied by so many questions!
One the one hand, it was rather refreshing to have a Romulan-themed story in quite a long time. The action sequences are super and the effects shots are great. Read more
Published on Jan 22 2005 by N Joungyuob B Ohh

4.0 out of 5 stars Good but not great.
This final outing of the 'next generation' crew is one of the better films in the franchise but not the best. Read more
Published on July 19 2004 by Ms. H. Sinton

5.0 out of 5 stars A Very Sad Farewell
Star Trek: TNG happens to be the best among all Star Trek Series EVER for me and growing up with this series on the sideline, it has been a part of my life. Read more
Published on July 11 2004 by Norliza Ismail

5.0 out of 5 stars Don't listen to the critics....
This movie was released during the first Lord of the Rings maina a few years back. How did they expect to do going up against a blockbuster like that? It is a good film. Read more
Published on Jun 27 2004 by picardfan007

4.0 out of 5 stars Really good
I'm going to be honest. I'm not a diehard Trekie. I've watched some of the shows over the years, and I've watched the movies when I could. Read more
Published on Jun 21 2004 by S. M. Anderson

5.0 out of 5 stars a very enjoyable entry in the long line of ST films
I am not going to argue if the film's plot is like another. I don't watch a film to hold comparisons. I judge the film strictly on its merits. Read more
Published on Jun 17 2004 by Deborah MacGillivray

4.0 out of 5 stars Much better than expected
This movie had decent writing, engaging human interest, and some really cool special effects. Shortcomings: The early buggy chase scenes were filmed way too high key -- just a... Read more
Published on Jun 14 2004

4.0 out of 5 stars Far Better Than What Critics & Box Office Indicated!
STAR TREK: NEMESIS (2002) may have flopped miserably at the box office (I believe that it is the only STAR TREK film not to have recouped its entire investment from theater... Read more
Published on Jun 1 2004 by Robert J. Schneider

Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject




i.e., each DVD must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.