Top critical review
drive-by publishing is full of errors and misinformation
on April 23, 2004
As one other reviewed noted, it's understandable that the first edition was rushed, but it's not acceptable that the 3rd edition is still so full of errors. The only reason I bought the 3rd edition was because I thought that it would be better than the 2nd, but it is not much better.
The author's informal style glosses over the numerous errors in the book. This is not standard UML (1 or 2). Often the most important concepts of UML are shown in only a single diagram and discussed very briefly, while the author's pet peeves and non-standard adaptations of UML are elaborated for pages.
There are several outright errors. E.g., just try to find figure 5.1, it is not there!
This book seems to be part of an effort to cast UML as being defined by celebraties, specifically Fowler, Booch, Jacobson, Rumbaugh, and some of the XP advocates. Repeatedly, individual preferences are shown to superceed the standard. UML is not a cult of personality, it *is* a standard notation. The whole point of UML is to have one notation that students, professionals, and tool vendors can agree on.